Forest Macro

in WORLD OF XPILAR2 years ago

Today there will be no familiar macro objects in the form of insects or something else. These will be photos of the forest in macro mode.

Being in the forest, we usually enlarge our attention. We see a tree more often than its separate leaf or needle. We see an anthill rather than an ant on top of it trying to drag a caterpillar inside.

However, there are a lot of individual fragments in the forest that are of interest. You just need to adjust your vision and attention to the search for new worlds.

Next time I'll show you another macroworld. The world of spiders.

DSC04730.jpg

DSC04731.jpg

DSC04732.jpg

DSC04732-2.jpg

DSC04733.jpg

DSC04735.jpg

Сегодня не будет привычных макро объектов в виде насекомых или чего-то ещё. Это будут фотографии леса в режиме макро.

Находясь в лесу мы обычно укрупняем наше внимание. Чаще видим дерево, чем его отдельный листочек или иголочку. Мы видим скорее муравейник, чем муравья на его вершине, который пытается затащить гусеницу внутрь.

Однако, в лесу есть очень много отдельных фрагментов, которые представляют интерес. Просто надо настроить своё зрение и внимание на поиск новых миров.

В следующий раз я покажу вам ещё один макро мир. Мир пауков.


100% SP (manual translation to SP)

#club100

The time has come to build our own steem power



CameraSony A7М2
LensHandMade
LocationRussia
Post-productionin LR

Manual processing in Lightroom


Unless otherwise specified, text and photos are copyright


мухомор


bambuka


SUBSCRIBE Here to join WORLD OF XPILAR Community

Regards, @bambuka

Sort:  

на последнем фото что-то такое... живое и волосатое)

 2 years ago 

На последнем фото не знаю, что за зверь...Стемонитис бурый Stemoitis fusca - род слизевиков (Миксомицеты, семейства стемонитис)...возможно этот вид слезевика.
Он точно живой и может двигаться))0

 2 years ago 

Spooky things can be discovered in the microverse.
Writing to you I had the doubt. Why do we say macro when we take photos of the micro world? I found this answer: "In photography, the original formal use was that macro meant larger than 1:1 life size (on the film media), and micro was less than that size. That has been corrupted now, people call anything macro, but yes, that's why Nikon labels their lenses as micro, not macro."
If I understood correctly the term macro refers to the photograph, not the subject being photographed. Right?

 2 years ago 

I agree, an ordinary cute butterfly with a strong magnification can seem like a creepy monster. And if you remember that butterflies also bite ...)))

At first, I also did not accept the term "macro" to the microcosm. After all, everything small is micro. From here we have a microscope. .

On the other hand, macro is an increase. The lens conventionally magnifies the object to 1:1 or more. Maybe from here it is called a macro lens. And that's why shooting with it is called macro. Then the name of the macro photos is logical))

If I understood correctly the term macro refers to the photograph, not the subject being photographed.

It turns out that so.

 2 years ago 

Its marvelous.thanks for sharing the beauty.
I made it my screen's image.👍👌
image.png
I loved the freshness in this pic the most

 2 years ago 

Glad you liked it))
My Pleasure :)
You are welcome 🖐️ 😊

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.28
TRX 0.12
JST 0.033
BTC 69774.83
ETH 3620.03
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.72