Intellectual Dark Web

Unusual Allies - Let me give you the libertarian perspective my friend, so far as free speech is concerned, perhaps this simple analogy may help you some day, Its far easier to explain than you do Dr Peterson...

Silver and Gold are statutory values in chemistry, what they are, is not reliant on what you or i think, it is reliant on the fundamentals of chemistry, which are innate to the universe itself, if something changes its properties at a chemical, or atomic level to something else, it is that, though, if i coat silver with gold, it is but that, silver coated with gold.

Politically, so far as free speech is concerned, if we were to legislate and make law, that silver coated gold, was to be considered gold, we have a problem, a big one, that is double think.

Whether it comes from the collectivist left, or the authoritarian right, the outcome is the same, scientific fact, is being distorted for political agenda, and enforcing it, for the will of the state, if to speak otherwise is punishable.

We can evolve as a society, to be liberal, accepting , diverse and open minded, but, we cannot, force a population and make law, to state that silver is gold, or vice versa, we cannot change the fundamentals of its chemistry.

If we live in an age where we can, which, perhaps, we may some day reach, that would be one thing, but at that point, there would be no "Debate" on the matter as silver really would, transmute to gold, in every aspect, and all its markers would not just be indistinguishable, but would be in fact the same.

Atoms, and their arrangement, be they biological or not, are simply chemistry, and if any government, wishes to challenge that, on this topic, or any other, i call double think, and people should be very concerned about those pushing for it.

I am a good friend to the LGBT community, and a great supporter of it, voter of Yes for my own country proudly, however, the precident, such a intellectual violation of free speech and free thought that the topics you have discussed, are, and should be , politically unacceptable, to any citizen in a free democracy.

The undertone, of the debate, is a valid one, and should be had, but it is not a matter for political or legal debate, it is solely a societal one.

To the fourth wave feminists using it as a political football for so called "gender inequality" i shall present you with a microscope, and i would urge you to observe the specifics of what you see.

What is required, is an injection, of different words and terms into the English language, that are reflective of social evolution, but not, a contradiction, to the accepted scientific facts, you cant make 3 different spheres, into the one thing.

And to think they are the one thing, is intellectual ignorance (with respect)

You're angst towards the so called "Patriarchy" has nothing to do with men, they are in the system, i will not deny that, your issue is the structure, and if you snapped your fingers and replaced everyone at the top, the system, would still be exactly the same, it would then just be by your definition a "Matriarchy" - so you see, you are chasing a red herring, made politically and socially involved, just attempting to "change the guard" without actually addressing the cause of the symptoms.

And meanwhile, while you may at times hate me, me and my lot, are actually you're best friends, because we are, directly, attacking your so called "Patriarchy" were attacking its core, i would ask you out for a drink to talk politics ladies, but i would be afraid you might sue me.

Good luck on your front.

Oh and Dr Peterson, welcome to the Crypto community, consider us the currency of the intellectual dark web, and yes, were censorship proof.