Art Plagiarism Case #30 - Caso de Plagio Artístico #30 - @marya77
Previous Art Plagiarism Cases by the User / Casos Previos de Plagio Artistico del Usuario:
https://steemit.com/antiabuse/@jaguar.force/art-plagiarism-case-29-caso-de-plagio-artistico-29-marya77
Post's URL / URL del post:
https://steemit.com/ntopaz/@marya77/ntopaz--marya77--328114218--ntopaz-artisteem-art-venture-artzone-art--2019-05-29-03-13-11--artwork--none
[Source]https://www.pinterest.ca/pin/485825878545246311/activity/tried)
Both pieces likely use as reference an uncredited photographic reference.
Source of the Art Plagiarism / Fuente del Plagio Artístico:
https://www.pinterest.ca/pin/485825878545246311/activity/tried
Voting Accounts to be Notified: @ntopaz @helpie @livvu @eonwarped @paulag @rozioo @roleerob @crimsonclad @trincowski @sbi8 @helpiecake @solominer @daan @smeralda @eforucom @clayboyn @citizensmith @upvoteshares @redrica @myotherstuff @sketch.and.jam @zipporah @theonlyway @bflanagin @discordiant @siomarasalmeron @socent @derangedvisions @trevorpetrie @potplucker @lillywilton @hagstrom @mountainjewel @markaustin @amymya @hazem91 @luisferchav @lunaticpandora @pechichemena @evecab @free-reign @veckinon @blockurator @big-m @soulturtle @javicuesta @shookriya @kbr @frejafri @spawnband @fulani @raoufwilly @asonintrigue @mrsbozz @carpedimus @kernelillo @art-mess @marysemciver @verhp11 @hornetmusic @gotpished
This is Jaguar Force,
Reporting directly from the Jungle.
Onwards!
This is not plagiarism, the final inspired art is totally different from the original.
Thank you very much for your support @drakos
Perhaps I did not have the science of this because I was spending all my time in the paintings
Maybe I'm inspired by this picture, but my goal in the videos was to teach the painting with coffee and this could not be a plagiarism.
Why do you think these bullies care? In my opinion, these people don't care about Plagiarism or Steem at all. This "Anti-Abuse" program of theirs is nothing more than a cover and an excuse for them to bully and insult people.
You see them complaining about the daily plagiarism of the whales who post a single YouTube video as if they were their own videos? Nope. They only go after the little ones. That should tell you what their real agenda is.
If you find plagiarism by a whale pass it over and we will make a report about it no problem.
If you can find these obscure posts, you can surely find the plagiarism at the Trending tab.
Please submit the cases to us via discord and we will evaluate them and publish a report if plagiarism is commited.
No, thanks. Last time I did that, the abusing whale attacked me instead.
I have just come to the conclusion that money is the only rule around here and I am slowly accepting it.
you can do in private... dont need use your profile in public...
I would like to ask you something, if i take your profile picture. i copied it and monetize it on other sites, would you agree?
My profile image was not made by me and I don't even have a way to contact the author. He offered it to me. There's no copyright.
markymark's avatar ... immediately it's from firefly....directly off imdb!
That's Plagiarism straight copying.....
Maybe it is important that someone cares about the sources from where people is take their ideas, but I don't consider this as a plagiarism eather. But it is always going to be interesting and relevant to discuss and know this type of situations. These type are common situations of any artistic and creative context. Re-interpretation, it is called. Both techniques are different, and their similarity is not in the essence of neather of both works, because their main attractive are in fact the techniques, and we see two different techniques here.
Yes, this is plagiarism since the photographic source is not cited, what determines if something is plagiarism is lack of attribution of sources, if the sources are not credited it is plagiarism.
The source is only listed as proof that there is a photo reference, not because the artwork is likely copied from that source. Thank you for your feedback.
Artists from all over the world create art inspired from Da Vinci, Michaelangelo, monuments, animals. They don't cite their inspiration, do they?
You are confounding two different issues, one thing is appropiation, as when you make a artwork that is inspired and takes from a famous work of art, as for example, la gioconda, the artwork is so notorious and known that it doesnt even need citation or credit.
Another thing is to create an artistic piece from a photo reference and not credit the photograph, which is plagiarism. Also, since this is an ntopaz post it needs to respect ntopaz rules which requires it to cite sources if any, in this case this work is clearly based on a photograph in view of the other work, and the source is not credited.
Also, see this post by a top Steem Artist with 30 years of experience producing and teaching art, he explains the utmost importance of always crediting sources, especially in cases such as steem in which you are monetizing the work.
https://steemit.com/ntopaz/@armandosodano/ntopaz--armandosodano--458703286--ntopaz-utopian-io-antiabuse-ita-art--2019-04-25-15-11-36--artwork--none
Hello, I have 4 question
2.do you see the complete video?
both art pieces are copied from the same photograph, or one from the other, no sources credited, so its plagiarism.
Congratulations @jaguar.force! You have completed the following achievement on the Steem blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :
You can view your badges on your Steem Board and compare to others on the Steem Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPVote for @Steemitboard as a witness to get one more award and increased upvotes!