Governments can do good. For sure. But is that all they do? What's the cost of accepting the good? What bad are we allowing ourselves to accept in the name of “good”?

_{Source: pixabay}

There is plenty of security provided. Governments and their federally employed workers called military are protecting us from would-be threats from abroad that might seek to do us harm, potentially.

Are the needed in all cases in our current times? What if Canada didn’t have an army? Would that mean another country would just invade us, enslave us, takw what we have, or take the country for themselves to expand their national boundaries?

There are plenty of nations with bigger armies that could. Why don't they? Is it because we’re friendly with many of them? Is it because we’re allies with so.e of the biggest so that other s dont mess with us? Why dobwe then need an army in the first place. Is the army really keeping us safe and secure in Canada?

Another federally employed security force are the police. Instead if allegedly protecting us from would-be invaders from abroad, the police are supposed to be there to protect us from each other.

Both these grouosnare there to protect us, apparently. In some cases and in some. Atjkns, some are more useful and living up to that promise. But in other cases, they are goons or a gang for a statist mafia of legalized plunder and corruption.

Military and police are granted authority over others, without the consent of others. I some cases they more or less abuse their power very little, but in others they oppress and keep people in line with the “order” or chaos that the government establishes in a society.

Goverments issue orders in order to impose their brand of “order” onto others. Some order is based in moral law, sure. But some order is simply control. Some laws are not moral laws, but legalized plunger that results in the control of others. It’s about making people do what you want them to do, regardless of it being morally lawful.

Take seat belts for example. No one is harming another by not wearing a seat belt. There is no possible victim being harmed by someone when a seat belt is not worn by someone. Yet, there are legal orders in place that operate under the veil of “law” and “order” to coercively steal money from us if we don’t wear a seat belt.

If I don’t wear a seat belt and I get hurt, that’s my problem. Why the fuck do people think a government can lawfully legally steal my money if they catch me not doing what they want me to do when I'm not harming anyone? They will steal money from me at the point ifna gun essentially. Because if I don't “pay up” to this mafia group, then they come with their guns to take me and lock me in a cage.

This is the madness of our society. Why society accepts legal extortion and theft through seat belt “laws” is absurd. We collectively accepted stupid arguments about how it’s justified to coerce, extort and steal from people for ”their own good”.

Another example is bike helmet laws. Gotta steal money from people because they choose not to wear a helmet. Yes, what a great moral society that is. People think that others have magical “rights” of authority to first of all makes these false “laws” in the first place to control others “for their own good”. And second, their thug gang goon squads have other rights and authority that other people don’t whonfet to enforce these “laws” on others. At the threat of a gun as always. Because if don’t, you will get put into a cage, and if you resist their tyranny and assault in your freedom and right tidonthinfs that don't harm others, then they get to legally shoot you.

Plus, we’re all paying for these “services” against our will, with coerced taxation as theft. We can’t choose to not pay, because again, they come with guns to make us pay for their exisence. And that’s freedom?

We ignorantly think this is making people’s lives more “secure” and brining more “order” to society. But it’s not real, authentic, genuine or.true order.based in moral law. It’s actually chaos. The chaos of harming you for doing no harm to anyone else, and having this chaos justified and supported by most of society.

Anarchy is no rulers. No masters who get to have “rights” and “authority” that others don't have, creating master-slave relationships. It’s not about no rules. Moral rule is moral law, moral truth. This is creating and living in authentic, genuine and true order.

When we have governments who create pseudo-order by conving usnthat it’s for our “own good”, then we justify chaos in our lives when we dare tinstand againstntheir tyrannical control over our lives. Sure, there are many moral laws being upheld by government, but we as free people could do that ourselves if we wanted to engage in the responsibility to create that level of order and freedom for all.

If we had a choice to pay for services we don’t want to do ourselves, then at least we could put and pull our money to and from the best and worst services offered. Without money being funelled into the government or their federally funded “services”, they don’t continue to exist.

People don’t work for free. Money talks. If we were free to choose where to put our money and create contracts for services, them at least we’re in control of what we get in society, as opposed to being coerced, extorted and stolen from I order to pay for things that we don’t support; that are immoral; that create chaos into our lives.