TOP 200 effective Steemit сurators that encourage discussion for the last week (2019.03.18-2019.03.24)

I want to share with you statistics about the most effective Steemit curators of the last week.

This statistic is not about how much the authors or curators have earned. This statistics shows the list of curators, whose contribution to the reward pool distribution is the most significant.

---

What does this mean?

You can say that there is nothing interesting in this statistics. That it is clear that the reward pool is distributed by whales. But!

The most interesting thing is how the curator distributes the reward pool. He can vote only for his posts and his comments. He can vote for a selected circle of authors and affiliated accounts. But also he can vote for a large number of authors who publish interesting content.

Thus, an effective curator is a curator who has sufficient Steem Power (he can be an investor or a popular author who has earned his Steem Power by publishing interesting content), devoting time and effort to the content curating at Steemit and distributing a reward pool in favor of the authors. And the efficiency level is estimated by how much SBD curator distributes among as many authors as possible.

But this time we will review those curators who reward the discussions, that is, they vote for the comments of other users.

According to the ideology of the Steemit creators, the discussion is as valuable an element as the author's content. Confirmation of this is the allocation of a separate pool of awards for comments.

---

How it works?

Votes - Each curator distributes a certain part of the reward pool with his votes (upvote / flag).

Authors - This part of the pool he distributes between a certain number of authors.

VAS (vote average strength) - For general awareness, we can estimate the average vote strength in percents (%), with which the curator votes.

Contr. (SBD) (Contribution in SBD) - The distributed part of the pool is the contribution of the curator, it is calculated in SBD. In this case, the author's reward is taken into account. The curator's reward is not taken into account.

Share % - The percentage of the curator contribution among the contributions of all curators, we can also estimate for information purposes in %.

Eff. - The effectiveness of the curator is estimated in conventional units and is calculated as follows.

The total number of authors who published rewarded comments for the period under study is determined.
Then the contribution of the curator is divided by the total number of authors, and then multiplied by the number of authors for whom the curator voted for the period.

Thus, we see that, having distributed even a smaller number of SBD between a larger number of authors, the curator can be more effective than other curators. At the same time, having a greater voice power, but not actively voting, supporting a small number of authors, the curator takes a lower position in the rating.

And now, statistics.

---

6431 authors published their rewarded comments during this week.

9088 accounts participated in the comments curating according to information from the database.

170896 votes were made during this week.

10427,07 SBD - is the total author rewards for this week.

---

TOP-200 effective comments curators for the last week (2019.03.18-2019.03.24)

№	Account	Votes	Authors	VAS(%)	Contr. (SBD)	Share %	Eff.
1	@steemhunt	2660	141	1	831,84	7,98	18,24
2	@theycallmedan	304	249	5	266,47	2,56	10,32
3	@utopian-io	156	39	10	1375,32	13,19	8,34
4	@gentlebot	767	336	15	87,81	0,84	4,59
5	@magicdice	80	67	45	335,96	3,22	3,5
6	@acidyo	411	214	3	74,41	0,71	2,48
7	@cryptoctopus	117	77	79	131,81	1,26	1,58
8	@oracle-d	109	92	2	99,47	0,95	1,42
9	@oliverschmid	366	159	21	29,91	0,29	0,74
10	@trafalgar	111	16	14	283,07	2,71	0,7
11	@z8teyb289qav9z	280	85	4	51,07	0,49	0,68
12	@chbartist	308	151	6	19,99	0,19	0,47
13	@ngc	280	85	4	35,77	0,34	0,47
14	@musing	76	30	71	97,47	0,93	0,45
15	@sirvotesalot	280	85	4	32,26	0,31	0,43
16	@reflektor	162	72	9	35,9	0,34	0,4
17	@crypto.piotr	609	241	9	10,71	0,1	0,4
18	@steemflagrewards	525	30	16	84,61	0,81	0,39
19	@realcleaner	419	38	12	62,7	0,6	0,37
20	@xpilar	403	96	5	23,65	0,23	0,35
21	@animalcontrol	1139	38	3	57,92	0,56	0,34
22	@double-u	286	50	26	41,09	0,39	0,32
23	@r2cornell	88	82	51	24,31	0,23	0,31
24	@art-pd	623	142	2	12,2	0,12	0,27
25	@jaki01	106	58	14	29,76	0,29	0,27
26	@smartvote	125	27	14	62,38	0,6	0,26
27	@sniffnscurry	227	34	3	47,09	0,45	0,25
28	@dapplovers	86	57	3	25,56	0,25	0,23
29	@czechglobalhosts	142	52	3	28,22	0,27	0,23
30	@hiroyamagishi	159	51	35	26,69	0,26	0,21
31	@rahemanali	69	52	100	25,42	0,24	0,21
32	@sharonomics	68	52	100	20,44	0,2	0,17
33	@rok-sivante	69	15	63	67,74	0,65	0,16
34	@fulltimegeek	682	35	5	29,82	0,29	0,16
35	@adm	488	2	9	489,44	4,69	0,15
36	@redpalestino	193	84	1	11,13	0,11	0,15
37	@sultan-aceh	362	75	7	12,3	0,12	0,14
38	@tasteem	95	12	4	77,47	0,74	0,14
39	@whatsup	260	136	11	6,21	0,06	0,13
40	@gooddream	119	42	33	18,02	0,17	0,12
41	@thecryptodrive	87	65	27	12,21	0,12	0,12
42	@bippe	93	57	16	13,58	0,13	0,12
43	@haejin	16	10	41	70,61	0,68	0,11
44	@cron	72	11	69	61,91	0,59	0,11
45	@kus-knee	148	78	4	7,92	0,08	0,1
46	@reiseamateur	158	80	16	7,93	0,08	0,1
47	@ntopaz	337	13	2	48,98	0,47	0,1
48	@glenalbrethsen	200	114	18	5,57	0,05	0,1
49	@berniesanders	281	85	4	7,9	0,08	0,1
50	@coingecko	54	42	50	13,46	0,13	0,09
51	@exyle	128	79	1	7,15	0,07	0,09
52	@prinzvalium	117	51	7	10,13	0,1	0,08
53	@delso	1758	10	3	51,65	0,5	0,08
54	@abusereports	328	85	1	6,4	0,06	0,08
55	@frogcake	109	10	100	54,63	0,52	0,08
56	@gank	76	16	83	31,73	0,3	0,08
57	@exterminator	366	28	11	17,91	0,17	0,08
58	@reazuliqbal	2416	166	3	2,97	0,03	0,08
59	@kgakakillerg	65	34	33	12,47	0,12	0,07
60	@v4vapid	38	27	5	16,5	0,16	0,07
61	@dswigle	276	117	36	3,69	0,04	0,07
62	@macoolette	140	73	17	5,98	0,06	0,07
63	@writesbackwards	47	31	86	13,79	0,13	0,07
64	@edicted	166	65	21	6,57	0,06	0,07
65	@kingscrown	40	15	51	24,32	0,23	0,06
66	@sjchoi	138	27	40	14,04	0,13	0,06
67	@mattclarke	94	51	16	8,14	0,08	0,06
68	@shaka	42	30	11	12,53	0,12	0,06
69	@lotto-austria	150	67	27	6,01	0,06	0,06
70	@prosperist	68	52	100	6,98	0,07	0,06
71	@tarazkp	175	67	7	5,69	0,05	0,06
72	@knircky	41	23	28	16,61	0,16	0,06
73	@extrospect	46	3	100	129,75	1,24	0,06
74	@michealb	156	65	2	6,03	0,06	0,06
75	@demotruk	28	13	73	29,29	0,28	0,06
76	@saramiller	49	12	72	24,14	0,23	0,05
77	@chriddi	155	41	30	8,35	0,08	0,05
78	@ranchorelaxo	12	1	100	290,89	2,79	0,05
79	@sindong	258	48	7	6,48	0,06	0,05
80	@shortsegments	145	52	24	6,54	0,06	0,05
81	@abh12345	151	78	8	4,16	0,04	0,05
82	@hebrew	51	51	35	6,72	0,06	0,05
83	@d00k13	291	86	6	3,54	0,03	0,05
84	@marketingmonk	58	17	65	14,14	0,14	0,04
85	@streetstyle	108	55	8	4,8	0,05	0,04
86	@canadian-coconut	50	33	2	8,1	0,08	0,04
87	@robertandrew	111	31	89	7,7	0,07	0,04
88	@broncnutz	58	38	3	7,14	0,07	0,04
89	@raj808	76	54	35	4,37	0,04	0,04
90	@meesterboom	156	58	3	4,46	0,04	0,04
91	@justyy	109	32	5	7,56	0,07	0,04
92	@phortun	105	52	33	4,54	0,04	0,04
93	@promisteem	32	10	89	25,4	0,24	0,04
94	@nothus	123	39	15	7,01	0,07	0,04
95	@ulfr	80	11	77	24,8	0,24	0,04
96	@steevc	133	78	17	3,29	0,03	0,04
97	@steemstem	100	11	9	22,73	0,22	0,04
98	@joeypark	26	17	31	16,81	0,16	0,04
99	@zeropay	14	12	93	19,79	0,19	0,04
100	@goldmatters	59	38	9	7,26	0,07	0,04
101	@majes.tytyty	110	31	10	7,89	0,08	0,04
102	@anayakhan	137	71	23	3,37	0,03	0,04
103	@adsactly	40	14	3	16,97	0,16	0,04
104	@liondani	13	11	94	19,93	0,19	0,03
105	@fulltimebot60	96	36	66	4,77	0,05	0,03
106	@balte	58	27	26	6,19	0,06	0,03
107	@stephenkendal	49	37	10	4,84	0,05	0,03
108	@brotherhood	81	4	100	41,63	0,4	0,03
109	@fulltimebot69	94	36	66	4,63	0,04	0,03
110	@ikrahch	74	50	22	4,32	0,04	0,03
111	@amosbastian	149	38	14	4,55	0,04	0,03
112	@jongolson	111	45	9	4,84	0,05	0,03
113	@vinzie1	276	63	9	2,91	0,03	0,03
114	@gardenofeden	36	6	78	34,65	0,33	0,03
115	@steemchiller	52	43	87	3,82	0,04	0,03
116	@vieanna	76	51	29	3,19	0,03	0,03
117	@brittandjosie	188	91	11	1,96	0,02	0,03
118	@guysellars	78	30	49	6,13	0,06	0,03
119	@fulltimebot59	90	38	66	4,46	0,04	0,03
120	@br0	56	11	74	18,99	0,18	0,03
121	@brian.rrr	36	21	28	9,44	0,09	0,03
122	@fulltimebot55	94	41	66	4,64	0,04	0,03
123	@benadam	70	51	100	4,2	0,04	0,03
124	@ericvancewalton	41	31	69	7,11	0,07	0,03
125	@davidorcamuriel	29	10	100	21,18	0,2	0,03
126	@bitbulls	70	51	100	3,29	0,03	0,03
127	@denniskoray	78	44	61	4,11	0,04	0,03
128	@bbana	55	26	16	6,59	0,06	0,03
129	@freiheit50	107	58	37	2,81	0,03	0,03
130	@suonghuynh	21	1	95	165,03	1,58	0,03
131	@himapan	218	43	8	4,02	0,04	0,03
132	@newageinv	84	46	11	2,39	0,02	0,02
133	@fulltimebot54	90	33	66	4,44	0,04	0,02
134	@fulltimebot61	91	32	66	4,5	0,04	0,02
135	@fulltimebot75	92	31	66	4,6	0,04	0,02
136	@theaustrianguy	42	28	20	5,48	0,05	0,02
137	@bitcoingodperson	63	27	34	5,13	0,05	0,02
138	@master-set	60	12	86	11,05	0,11	0,02
139	@jungjunghoon	85	51	12	2,45	0,02	0,02
140	@hunnybadger	57	9	87	16	0,15	0,02
141	@karamyog	135	55	98	2,39	0,02	0,02
142	@fulltimebot68	92	31	66	4,55	0,04	0,02
143	@fulltimebot58	93	30	66	4,58	0,04	0,02
144	@mammasitta	90	46	10	2,49	0,02	0,02
145	@fulltimebot66	89	26	66	4,42	0,04	0,02
146	@fulltimebot62	91	35	66	4,49	0,04	0,02
147	@fulltimebot53	88	35	66	4,34	0,04	0,02
148	@slobberchops	82	36	6	2,7	0,03	0,02
149	@johannpiber	210	36	6	2,72	0,03	0,02
150	@fulltimebot63	91	32	66	4,49	0,04	0,02
151	@bigpower	73	36	33	2,9	0,03	0,02
152	@pixelfan	355	16	11	8,69	0,08	0,02
153	@hingsten	27	9	46	12,41	0,12	0,02
154	@fulltimebot73	92	35	66	4,52	0,04	0,02
155	@ecoinstant	60	41	86	2,68	0,03	0,02
156	@ezzy	19	12	28	9,63	0,09	0,02
157	@world-travel-pro	116	31	18	3,55	0,03	0,02
158	@fulltimebot71	91	35	66	4,53	0,04	0,02
159	@seo-boss	80	49	17	3,25	0,03	0,02
160	@uwelang	61	45	7	2,36	0,02	0,02
161	@stayoutoftherz	63	39	12	2,94	0,03	0,02
162	@twinner	23	18	14	8,81	0,08	0,02
163	@fulltimebot57	90	27	66	4,45	0,04	0,02
164	@kerrywolf	79	28	30	3,59	0,03	0,02
165	@variola	63	52	47	2,57	0,02	0,02
166	@fulltimebot67	90	34	66	4,45	0,04	0,02
167	@fulltimebot9	84	24	65	4,23	0,04	0,02
168	@fulltimebot65	91	34	66	4,51	0,04	0,02
169	@fulltimebot70	92	35	66	4,58	0,04	0,02
170	@fulltimebot64	93	34	66	4,62	0,04	0,02
171	@payforplay	25	6	100	25,38	0,24	0,02
172	@kaylinart	49	36	49	3,26	0,03	0,02
173	@adetorrent	55	35	5	4,28	0,04	0,02
174	@fulltime	122	23	44	6,02	0,06	0,02
175	@proboards	121	25	35	6,01	0,06	0,02
176	@hilarski	58	44	48	3,17	0,03	0,02
177	@noaommerrr	87	2	100	66,2	0,63	0,02
178	@fulltimebot72	90	34	66	4,49	0,04	0,02
179	@espoem	150	39	15	2,71	0,03	0,02
180	@fulltimebot74	91	26	66	4,52	0,04	0,02
181	@dandays	62	37	54	3,72	0,04	0,02
182	@pinkspectre	32	19	100	7,27	0,07	0,02
183	@steinreich	104	58	5	2,19	0,02	0,02
184	@neoxian	55	19	5	5,99	0,06	0,02
185	@edgarare1	239	109	40	1,39	0,01	0,02
186	@organduo	144	50	1	2,79	0,03	0,02
187	@accelerator	235	14	3	7,29	0,07	0,02
188	@jaff8	149	38	14	3,13	0,03	0,02
189	@steem-ua	8	6	59	25,6	0,25	0,02
190	@kevinwong	28	16	6	9,42	0,09	0,02
191	@mightypanda	63	20	88	6,85	0,07	0,02
192	@englishtchrivy	71	12	83	8,7	0,08	0,02
193	@onceuponatime	59	42	2	2,47	0,02	0,02
194	@jphamer1	12	12	100	8,24	0,08	0,02
195	@djohan	80	19	60	8,18	0,08	0,02
196	@jenina619	85	67	40	1,45	0,01	0,02
197	@pifc	75	38	25	3,42	0,03	0,02
198	@richatvns	34	30	22	3,7	0,04	0,02
199	@delegate.lafona	99	12	9	10,32	0,1	0,02
200	@erniegreenhill	116	59	32	1,66	0,02	0,02

---

I took all vote bots (most of them are working like pay for vote) in the separate table. Because we can't call them effective curators. Their work depends on authors payments and activity.
If you know another bots in the list above please tell me about it.

№	Account	Votes	Authors	VAS(%)	Contr. (SBD)	Share %	Eff.
1	@dustsweeper	1454	311	4	29,52	0,28	1,43
2	@dustbunny	547	305	8	6,9	0,07	0,33
3	@steembasicincome	107	53	7	8,13	0,08	0,07
4	@sbi2	112	54	20	8,76	0,08	0,07
5	@sbi4	96	48	40	8,48	0,08	0,06
6	@minnowvotes	95	8	4	45,33	0,43	0,06
7	@sbi3	89	50	30	8,17	0,08	0,06
8	@sbi5	87	45	27	4,11	0,04	0,03
9	@oceanwhale	24	4	53	29,6	0,28	0,02
10	@sbi6	81	37	28	2,65	0,03	0,02

---

Now you know all these heroes. Their daily work increases the interest in the discussion, gives hope to some authors, and some even a decent income. Their work attracts new authors in Steemit and makes existing users remain.

---

Information sources

All information is prepared by querying data from a SteemSQL - SQL database containing information from Steem's blockchain, as well as by calculations based on this data.

Special thanks to @arcange for SteemSQL and for the advice provided to me during the development of this project.

---

_{Sponsored ( Powered by dclick )}