Lie

Today is a great place in modern societies. The lie appears not only in the private sphere, but also in the public sphere. There is almost no limit to the life of the place where the lie will live. Because in some cases, the individual may try to deceive himself or to lie to someone else. The reason why an individual lied to another person or someone about a particular event may of course be caused by some psychological reasons. But the limit of lies is not limited to the science of psychology. Because the lie has a meaningful relationship with sociology.

Man is lonely, weak, weak in nature. Man gains the power of nature by acting with the people who exist outside. Therefore, people should be a social entity. Through this sociality, he manages to stand against the nature of his weakness. Thus, it becomes a social entity as a guarantee of human existence and security. As a social being, people avoid being weak in nature not only by themselves, but by communication and communication with other people. The man who lives by himself in the difficulties of continuing to exist in nature establishes a relationship with other people and continues his life. In the context of a contract, people who form a community give up their freedom because they are born only free and free for the sake of their interests.

From a primitive structure to progressing to statehood, the human being has drawn various laws to keep society together and to ensure the safety of people and property. It is possible to separate these laws in written or in written form. But what is produced to keep people together is not only the law. And he invented his lie. Of course, it cannot be said that mankind produced the lie with a need similar to a law of some kind. But the law was against him and even against him. So it is possible to say that the lie appeared before the law. Although a law has been created to ensure the safety of human and property, another reason for its emergence is the prevention of lies; This is to ensure safety and reliability among people. Therefore, there are both written and non-written laws. We do not see this in religious teachings only in the laws of state or in the oral laws of traditions.

Image Source

Pagan religions or spiritual religions are discussed in many issues. While lying is a common subject in all religions, lying is a serious sin. In the history and lies of humanity, we see a history that always tries to ban it, excludes it and does not accept it. But despite all this, the relationship between humanity and lies continues from the past to the present. This relationship is extremely comprehensive. Human lies in special relations, public relations, political relations or propaganda. Although humanity has had a common stance against lies throughout history, it has used society to regulate or protect the order.

Lie is not prohibited in religious teachings only. In the history of philosophy, many philosophers have placed themselves in a bad place in the human actions of lies in the context of moral philosophy. This situation continues until the ancient Greek philosophy. Aristotle thinks about lying; The lie itself is ugly and denial, and the truth is beautiful and praise. One of the modern philosophers, Immanuel Kant, said the following about the lie: What we need to call good, though, is an object of the capacity of desire in the trial of every wise person, and the evil must be an object of hatred. the eyes of all; therefore, the judgment in this matter requires a reason other than logic. This is for lies that lie against justice, for lies that lie against violence While philosophers in the history of philosophy often have ideas that negatively affect philosophers, contrary to this idea there are also echoes of lies. In this sense, Niccolo Machiavelli has a false sense in the context of political philosophy. Because, based on the policy understanding of the period, he wants to create a prince to rule. Apart from that, the history of philosophy often excludes moral philosophy and lies in the context of religion or individual relationship or politically.