The Cash Flow Project, Can Crypto and Cash be a Couple

in #blog6 years ago

animal-bank-note-blur-164627.jpg

Cash Is King

I often hear the chorus of commentators proclaim that the Cashless society is here and that digital technologies will replace the need for holding cash. I like to remind them that there is good reason for saying that cash is king. There are certain characteristics of cash that cannot be replicated by traditional digital currencies such as debit, Mastercard and Visa. I think this pursuit of payment flexibility should always be tempered with need to maintain the anonymity that cash affords individuals. It certainly is true that governments and banks would like to drive consumer to use traceable payment options to better track and maintain enforcement of rule of law Know Your Client (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) guidelines. I think we overestimate the capacity of governments to effectively do anything which can be best left to the free market of money, and crypto currencies are a testament to this. Let us focus on some of the challenges that are faced by banks related to card compliance and how crypto currencies may represent a good balance between cash and digital payments options.

The world as suggested is not exponentially turning away from cash settlements for transactions but rather the importance of cash due to its unique properties makes it continued use very likely. The World Cash Report states that “Cash demand is growing consistently, based on increasing ratio of Currency in Circulation vs. GDP and positive growth in the value of ATM withdrawals (+4.6% in 2015). The world average Currency in Circulation vs. GDP ratio is 9.6% in 2016 (up from 8.1% in 2011). Pg.129. It clear that demand of cash and cash equivalent products is on the rise, and the fear of a cashless society is largely overexaggerated. The properties of Cash preserve the freedom of individuals to purchase without a digital fingerprint which may later be used by companies and governments as profiling information which from a rights perspective is undesirable. Let us take a quick look at Mastercard and Visa and how they are navigating this brave new world of mass data and digital transactions.

The Cost of Credit Compliance

The management by Mastercard and its principle members various cards programs including data and KYC/AML requirements has not been as effective as one would assume. The idea of a grand conspiracy in which card companies are collecting and utilizing our personal spending data is largely overstated. Having over 10 years of experience with both Visa and MasterCard its principle members and affiliates has provided me with some real insight into how this industry operate and where they are focusing their compliance and data monitoring budgets. The reality is that most medium sized banks remain affiliates of a Mastercard principal member and must use these members’ compliance teams and expertise to facilitate the use of a card program for their clients. In the current regulatory environment of high data and transactional compliance costs, Visa and Mastercard are not in the issuing many new principle members agreements. Taking on new members in this environment increases the cost of MasterCard’s data, compliance and regulatory oversight structures and there is a general de-risking currently underway. Given the complexity of running a Mastercard’s principle members program, banks or payment processors utilize technologies that assist in remaining compliant with the ever-increasing demands of regulators in this area, but these technologies are far from perfect. Although they tend to flag specific criteria of activity and bring to attention of bank compliance specific problematic issues with client transactions, they require human intervention and investigation to complete assessments. The offshore banking world is even father behind on its data and payment risk management, and often clients are exposed to long compliance investigations which require documentation to be provided on activities that arise from ATM cash withdrawals done via a credit card. These compliance requirements of mainstream banks push client towards payment processing solutions which are much more flexible, and blockchain and cryptographic currencies in general have been playing a role in providing consumers with alternative options in this area.

The Cash Cow

Cash has the benefits of being Legal tender, easy to use and available, immediately transfers value, is a safe-haven and emergency fund and is anonymous. Yet cash can still be insecure as it can be counterfeited and is relatively easy to steal from another individual although losses are limited to what is on hand. I think it is reasonable to expect “that as long as these attributes (valued assets) are only fulfilled by cash and not by any other alternative, cash will fulfil a need and therefore will continue to be a widely used payment instrument”Pg.20. Can blockchain and distributed ledger provide a digital currency solution that achieves similar attributes to cash? A country could decide to have a cryptographic currency be legal tender as such a change could be mandated via the laws of this nation. Increasing the ease of use and availability of a crypto currency is a surmountable technological obstacle, and these currencies could be as easy to use as any other digital credit technology such as Visa, Mastercard and debit. Crypto Currencies certainly already provide an immediate transfer of value in an anonymous fashion and are far more effective and safe than cash in this regard. We will see bitcoin and other crypto currencies act as safe haven stores of value as national fiat currencies come under economic and budgetary pressure. You could certainly have your crypto wallet details memorized or stored on a device, but in the case of a natural disaster there will be an obstacle to using any digital currency unless there is technology which allows that currency to be available.

A Match Made in Heaven

I think we can all agree that cash has some unique properties that make it very useful in transactions. Digital payment processor such as MasterCard face substantial obstacles due to regulatory pressures to understand the source and parties involved in all transactions and this put them at a competitive cost disadvantage to cash. As crypto currencies come out of the shadows into the forefront of our economic lives they will face the same regulatory pressures, and unlike cash may not be able to resist the legal and compliance requirements of (KYC) and (AML) frameworks. If free market participants are left to choose the attributes that best serve their transactional needs, then our futures may be full of cash and cryptographic currencies. I know that our economic freedom largely depends on the free market of ideas and technology and I hope to continue to contribute to both.

Sort:  

@lighttorch This post measure the possibility of the future cash, and crypto together into the markets. I liked the way you bring the legal explanation, and which could be the roll, of the businesses, for it regulation.
I think, blockchain tech could solve a big part, of the identification of the individuals and its operations.

I agree that blockchain tech unlike other digital currencies provides a real possibility of solutions for the larger concerns of centralization of loss of privacy via transaction. Exciting times!!

@lighttorch Thanks you, for support. Thinking about cryptocurrencies.
You are right in your thoughts; and I hope soon, could be a reality.

Hi, I just voted you! There are new topics that you might like, the rise of BTc as imminent criterion.

https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@james0603/charlie-shrem-founder-of-the-bitcoin-foundation

This post has received a 9.72 % upvote from @boomerang.

This post has received votes totaling more than $50.00 from the following pay for vote services:

appreciator upvote in the amount of $36.35 STU, $61.36 USD.
therising upvote in the amount of $24.09 STU, $40.66 USD.
buildawhale upvote in the amount of $18.97 STU, $32.02 USD.
rocky1 upvote in the amount of $18.02 STU, $30.41 USD.
upme upvote in the amount of $9.84 STU, $16.60 USD.
boomerang upvote in the amount of $8.30 STU, $14.00 USD.
jerrybanfield upvote in the amount of $6.28 STU, $10.60 USD.
ebargains upvote in the amount of $1.71 STU, $2.88 USD.

For a total calculated value of $124 STU, $209 USD before curation, with approx. $31 USD curation being earned by the paid voters.

This information is being presented in the interest of transparency on our platform and is by no means a judgement as to the quality of this post.

huh! I really feel more confident having tokens (i have some, like PKT, ETH etc) and cash, than using the card where my name is incused

Good Point I feel that in certain circumstances cash is best and in other I prefer digital crypto currencies. regardless of the mix you use just be aware of the risk/reward calculus.

To listen to the audio version of this article click on the play image.

Brought to you by @tts. If you find it useful please consider upvote this reply.

Hi @lighttorch, be sure to check out @tipU voting service :) grab a vote for free ;) tipuvote! 1
(the comment is added only when you send upvote to someone else:)

Cash might always act as a safeguard, or in other words, a backup. Used for emergency situations. Your phone dies, you lose your phone, the power goes out and your phone can't be charged and your computer won't turn on, etc. For now these are everyday inconveniences and therefore, it will require improvements within other current technologies for our society to truly become cashless. But for now we are making great strides towards cryptocurrency away from fiat. For those interested in cryptocurrency, head over to Blockbasis, where users can send and receive crypto like Bitcoin and Ethereum using only an email.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.35
TRX 0.12
JST 0.040
BTC 70753.86
ETH 3589.34
USDT 1.00
SBD 4.75