Has Alex Jones set himself up for a world of hurt...?

in #blog5 years ago

After just watching the recent 'Q' posts on you tube, and Corsii possible plea deal from mueller, (and earlier intimations from the 'Q' side of things, that Alex Jones and Corsi, may not be the free speech, libertarian advocates, that they let on...

Are they actors set up to try and to control the opposition narratives ? I dunno, but there are some clues hinting at the possibility..

scaled map - Copy - Copy - Copy.jpg

It appears 'Q' seems to be saying exactly this (from previous, older posts).

IF that is the case, and if 'Q' claims turns out to be legitimate, then if I was Alex Jones, I would be a very worried man....

Imagine if the 'Q' story is legitimate, and the deep state falls, as predicted. (wooohooo!), it would mean leaving lots of people hanging out to dry, for sure.

Alex Jones could well be one of these.
But for Alex Jones, this could be a much more dangerous position, than most.

Why?

He has preaching to the gun toting libertarians for years..... Years.

Imagine how fucked off and cheated these people might will feel. Imagine how stupid they might feel.

Anyone who's a little unstable, well might be spun into a rage on hearing such news...And the humiliation that might come from following a con merchant for years....
(Not me, he helped red pill me - and I gleaned loads of useful information. But not everyone is as mild mannered as I am..)

I would not want to have held sway with gun toting millions, and to then be exposed as a fraud to your followers...
(even though he rep pilled millions).

It only takes one person to be really fucked off, to then really fuck up some one else's life...

scaled map - Copy - Copy - Copy.jpg

..Or maybe he has been an intended fall guy all along. Played.

Funny how he talks about useful idiots so much...

I have no idea what going on, re'Q' - but the thought just came to me...

Sort:  

The irony of "Q" exposing Jones as a fraud. I love the internet, this is too much!!! lol

It was only a thought...

I know, we've had this chat before. ;)

Curated for #informationwar (by @commonlaw)

  • Our purpose is to encourage posts discussing Information War, Propaganda, Disinformation and other false narratives. We currently have over 8,000 Steem Power and 20+ people following the curation trail to support our mission.

  • Join our discord and chat with 200+ fellow Informationwar Activists.

  • Join our brand new reddit! and start sharing your Steemit posts directly to The_IW!

  • Connect with fellow Informationwar writers in our Roll Call! InformationWar - Contributing Writers/Supporters: Roll Call Pt 11

Ways you can help the @informationwar

  • Upvote this comment.
  • Delegate Steem Power. 25 SP 50 SP 100 SP
  • Join the curation trail here.
  • Tutorials on all ways to support us and useful resources here

Alex Jones is Bill Hicks playing a role, Q is a propaganda outlet and all of this is a giant scam being played out - that's my 2 cents worth.

I believe Alex Jones is Bill Hicks... i mean, unless T.H.E.Y. really have cloning technology, and they killed off Bill and then put Alex out into the public.

However, Alex Jones has awoken a lot of people.
Funny thing is Alex Jones works for getting people worked up and angry. However, you can't continue to stay in the anger phase. Sooner or later you come to accept the new view of reality, and then you just work with it.

This is the main point in showing that Alex Jones is playing a part. He is acting. Because, you literally can't stay in the anger phase.

But, if you where able to take advanced alien technology to take video anywhere on the planet. What you would find from watching T.H.E.M. is that Alex Jones was barely scratching the surface. We would go and let out everyone from a prison, all the murders and rapists, to make room for T.H.E.M.

So true - only thing that perplexes me is why did Bill Hicks decide to become that totally second rate character?

I never thought much of Bill Hicks, but sticking to that dickhead character Alex Jones is a real step down - previously he could go in and out of that character and do a bunch of other ones...

what will you give me for 5 cents?

lolol

That's old news - not giving you 5 cents for that!
lmao

Why do think 'q' is a psi op...?

How about 1 cent?

Q is like wikileaks - some true stuff, some fake - and Q pushes the whole donald chimp is a hero line...

But on Steemit nobody ever dares rip into either of those propaganda outlets because they are both worshiped like the bible by people with serious $ and followings (suspicious much - what me?)

But on Steemit nobody ever dares rip into either of those propaganda outlets because they are both worshiped like the bible by people with serious $ and followings

Why not?

I would!... lol

If I did it might be from a different account!

....the only trouble I have with aggression from 'biggies', is when I was after the left....
A sensitive lot, and very lazy - they can't be arsed fighting with words and just hit the downvote button instead...

Photo's can be very misleading...

scaled map - Copy - Copy - Copy.jpg

I have some of Stalin with his comrades also , before he changed his mind...lol

What is misleading about that photo? - Punch, meet Judy...

.....there was no Israel then! fake news fake news!

I do not trust Alex Jones at all! He's very deceiving most of the time and he shares just as much half-truths as the mainstream media, difference is the mainstream is more believable. I really dont like him. Hes one of the worst of alternative media.

I agree with you, but he still red pilled lots of people..

Even if he turns out to be a total stooge- the positives (in terms of red pilling) of his show for the last decade or two, will outweigh the harm (imo).

I agree with Frot, they are both (in my opinion) controlled opposition, though both have red pilled a lot of people.
So like anything or anyone else, including me, you have to make up your own mind what they or I say, such is life.

.....you have to make up your own mind.....

Awwwww - that hurrrrrrrrrrrrts.....

The term "Gun-toting" is almost always used by leftists with negative connotations. In fact, I don't think I've heard it once used by someone who is in favor of the second amendment. I think you really tipped your hand here lucylin, knowingly or unknowingly you came off like a genuine leftist.

Also, Q's been around since like 2017, speaks in riddles, and has or has not been replaced multiple times. While Alex Jones has been doing television in the form of public access and talk radio since 1996. Jones spills his guts out and tells you everything on his mind.

Q speaks in riddles and fragments. You tell me which one do you think would be eaiser to fake? With the amount of air time that Jones puts in, if he were a fake then he faked his whole god damn life.

I don't buy it. Also I think that at first Q put out some good questions, it's always good to ask questions and make people think. However, the new Q quickly lost people. All but those that fell into the cult of Q. People are so quick to fall into belief. You should never buy into all of anyone's B.s. (belief system).

People are not perfect and they get it wrong all of the time. So instead of trying to pitt Jones against Q. Why not pick a specific issue and pitt their stances against each other based on that one issue. Fuck the cult of personality, lets examine the nuts and bolts and see what's what.

"Gun-toting" s/b replaced w/ "gun-owners" is what you are saying? It's in the paradigm, of Left vs. Right, that Jones and "Q" keep everybody focused. This is why they are both controlled opposition. Anything the left says that gives you the creeps, in the form of connotations, is part and parcel for the course. Be offended, choose a side and most importantly fight amongst yourselves!!!

If you cannot see that the left is clearly and actively trying to destroy the country. I don't know how to help you, maybe I can share a few examples.

They want Americans disarmed, despite the second amendment. They want Illegal immigration, as opposed to extreme vetting that would weed out criminals and terrorists. They want people to be tolerant. Yet, they themselves are intolerant to everyone who doesn't believe and or speak exactly as they do. They want "free health" care which turned out to not-only-not-be-free, but also the most expensive and worthless healthcare in America's history. They want a free college education. Yet, they don't have the brains to realize that their "free education" is something that they would pay for in increased taxes for the rest of their lives. The left has become very radical and pure poison. Unfortunately, it's mostly because they'eve been brainwashed and do not know how to think. There is a real information war going on and the best way to wake people up is to challenge their belief systems and educate them as often as possible. Or we could just let the left to turn America into Venezuela. What would you rather see people focus on @dexterdumb?

This is exactly what I'm talking about. I'm not a lefty by any means. My slightest opposition to your comment leads you to assume I'm on the other side, as if there are only 2. This IS the left vs right paradigm I'm talking about.
I admonish radical leftism more than you do probably. The point is there is a gigantic grey area that most of us exist in. The left vs right paradigm is meant to polarize the population so that those who control the strings can continue to loot because the camp on one side doesn't like the other. So they want to fight about "fringe issues". ie. gun control, abortion, healthcare. W/e keeps us fighting amongst ourselves serves the string pullers on the left and right side. What they won't tell you is that THEY actually work together. A one world gov't is the end-game and we'll get there using fascist or communist means, it doesn't matter to the string pullers which pill we swallow as long as it's one of the pills they are prescribing.
In summary, the truth of all matters is somewhere in the middle. ;)

Well, you say those are fringe issues. What is
it that you would rather see people focus on?
They are using gradualism to push for a
one world order. This means they need to dis-
mantle the foundation of society piece by piece
incrementally. It might seem fringe to you but
the second amendment for example is very
important. You have to disarm a population
before you can successfully conquer them.
What issues would you say are not fringe?
Or where, in your opinion, do you think that
people should be focusing their attention on?

It's not fringe in it's scope of importance. I agree w/u 100%. What is meant by fringe is it's on the outside of major issues, such as gov't waste and theft of tax dollars (this is my primary for attention focusing). For example the trillion dollars that was unaccounted for and was scheduled to be announced to the populace in and around the same day 9/11 occured. Education on how powerful banking individuals and institutions are stealing money and then using that money to propagandize the same population. This occurs are such a large scale globally at this point, there simply isn't anything more worth a person's time and protest march against. This is why the media hypes up the fringe issues and stirs up a bunch of shit. This is their #1 job.
See the thing is no one likes being lied to/stolen from. How much time would ppl on the left or right spend bickering over compelled language if they knew how they were being robbed blind. You would see the fringe issues disappear from the narrative. A new organic narrative would spawn and those that pull the strings would be shitting themselves. This is why a financial education about banking and the roll of forced legislation in favor of the same few men/women, over and over again, would put a stop to the arguing. String pullers have no interest in that. Hence CNN and the rest have gone full retard the deflect attention onto the "fringe".

:D actually, I'm accutely aware of those issues (see comments). Yet, I am also concerned with other issues too, it's all corrupt to the core.

I didn't doubt for a second. You seem like a sharp fella! These are my priorities, and entertaining the thoughts of hucksters and imbeciles (FOX vs CNN), is not. ;)

The term "Gun-toting" is almost always used by leftists with negative connotations. In fact, I don't think I've heard it once used by someone who is in favor of the second amendment.

Well, you have now lol. I'm not American.

I think you really tipped your hand here lucylin, knowingly or unknowingly you came off like a genuine leftist.

shit my cover has been blown!

am I q? or alex? lol

..I have no idea ...but as time goes on the evidence against legitimacy increases..this next couple of weeks...?

So instead of trying to pitt Jones against Q....

I wasn't pitting anyone against any one, it was just an hypothesis I came up with when I wasn't writing anything else..

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.25
TRX 0.11
JST 0.032
BTC 61645.58
ETH 3013.85
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.71