Karl Marx was lazy..., what does that say about his philosophy?

He has fundamental flaws in his perspectives of what the human being is. Or he just ignored them to fit his narrative.
He was lazy, not stupid.

He was a cuckoo in the nest himself, using not his labor to build things, but his ability to manipulate people through his tongue.
Smack in the middle of the industrial revolution, he never actually worked in real employed service. A Job.
(with the possible exception of the Rothschild's, of which he was 2nd or 3rd cousin to, and definitely some English Crimean war mongerer. Lord Cardigan possibly...? I forget who...)

He was a theorist in every aspect of his life. People gave him stuff.
I wonder how that helped strengthen his conviction in the purity of socialism..?

His morals were suspect (I'm being nice, here), which is also not a good stance to adopt when trying to sell an ideology fit for the world.
After having an affair with his engels sponsored live in cleaner of the house.
He then kicked her out onto the street.

What does this tell you about the moral fortitude of a man?
What does this tell you about the moral fortitude of his followers?

Words and not actions seem to be the measuring tool here.
Which strangely enough is the totally opposite maxim, of the free marketeer...

This tells you a lot.

Back to the Marxy and his fundamental flaws. ( his ideological ones ones, not his penis control ones).

...flaws in basic premises, which he then uses as foundations for his works.

A shitty palace built on a foundation of fundamental flaws.
I wonder why socialism doesn't work...?

Here are some fundamental miscalculations, from which a whole pseudo science was based.

Primitive cultures had communism.

An urban myth then, and a defense of communism today.

There is no evidence that it ever existed.

There is no evidence of this today, in primitive tribes.
....or any studies of primitive tribes that any anthropologist's have come across in modern times. No communism existed.
A fallacy.

This being one of his foundational premises to illustrate to society that communism once worked and one that can be a successful strategy.
(He never actually left his armchair to even monitor newly discovered tribes.)
All his evidence was secondary or tertiary and supposition.

All evidence in studies of ancient societies, and newly discovered tribes, show that the basic structure to any community was .....and is...FAMILY

Not rocket science, if you really think about.
Look around you, we haven't changed.

With the present day obsession with the state destroying the family unit - It's almost as if they know that while the strong family structure exists, communism can never succeed.
Which also begs the question - if this is the case, and it is a proven structure of success why do the communist feel the need to destroy it...destroy the very foundation of a successful evolutionary strategy....mmm)

Family structures, (and monarchy an extension of this) was the structure of communities.
Everything was built around this. Emerged from this.
Then Expanded outwards from this..

It was all based around the family unit.

All evidence suggest that property was, and has always been - a thing.
Ownership of assets was always there, in every society.
Inheritance in almost every culture.
Ancient burial ceremonies were often done with the worldly material goods of the deceased, being buried with them.

SO, we have a societies that are built around family, and ownership (property rights). This very _ natural_ behavior is exhibited through a multitude of disconnected cultures.

It is a thing.

Marx was wrong.

And then we have biology....

Biology – Humans are competitive by nature. All animals are competitive by nature - even herbivores.
Darwinist philosophy (and logic) says this to be true.
Your eyes tell you this with a study of animals.
It will take you less than a day to come to this conclusion - just by observing animals in nature.

What is strange, is that while communists are overwhelmingly atheist - and they use science as their benchmark, if not their god - they refute the science and logic of Darwinism when it doesn't fit their paradigm of competition.
Marx was no Darwin, but he somehow caries more weight in this sphere than someone who was forever observing the natural world, all over the world...

In Marxist theory there is no natural human competitive spirit. This basic human trait - as a reality - is denied in communism.
Life IS competition.
Cooperation in amalgamated competition is NOT communism.
It is a mutually beneficial exchange.

We will always compete.

'Each according to his needs' is total BS, except when in a utopian's denial of reality.

Cultures are competitive.
Further evolving centralization is a product of this.
Efficiency is a thing with centralization.

It's evolution of - and further centralization of - destroys itself.
Inefficiency is a thing when competition is reduced through centralization.

These apparent paradoxical cycles , are leapt upon by the communist - choosing to focus minutely on one part of this cycle, and using the other parts to substantiate an argument.
It's childish, and divisive - and you can see how the seeds of the cultural marxism logic have sprouted through this type of argument..

Seeing the whole dynamic together, destroys the Marxist perspective. So they ignore it

Trying to argue Marxism without these couple of foundational mistakes, and you have no argument.

What do I think? (I'm gonna tell you, anyway).

Communists are scared individuals (r gene, not K) who push for 'non competition' - because they know they cannot compete.

They are the weaklings in the evolutionary fact of competition - and so must try to undermine it.
Not for a political ambition, but a genetic necessity. (unconsciously at least).

The chances of their genes ever being replicated in the open market, and a freedom based society are drastically reduced. ....And so become the competition haters.

It's an evolutionary war they will never win. It is also another cyclical dynamic of a natural phenomenon - the struggle between R and K gene types.

The communists are the runts in the litter. Competition is an anathema.

And when they are also in the 4% of psychopaths, sociopaths, and extreme narcissists.....???

......You get Stalin...