Is mental life in man clarified by the rule of feeling as it were?

Philosophical paper on feeling

Technique: Dialectical:

Presentation (Introducing Problem)

An individual carries on with an alternate mental life relying upon the conditions and conditions. He feels by and by in delight and by and by in pity and feels once in joy and once in torment. On the off chance that the inclination makes us mindful of our mental condition, does this inclination advise us of what is inside us of mental conditions and think about our conduct? Clear for us? Or on the other hand is there another viewpoint we don't get it?

At the end of the day, is all that I myself is essentially my inclination?

Show: (attempt to determine the issue)

The French rationalist Laland characterizes the inclination as "the instinct of his conditions and activities". "The feeling of this definition is the mindfulness that dependably goes with us in doing any work." Thus the exemplary school thoughts were established on this view driven by the French scholar Descartes 1596/1650 The premise of this hypothesis is the Greek rationality, explicitly the perspectives of Socrates 479/399 BC, which I trust that man knows himself and can pass judgment on it and its conditions and activities. Communicated I renowned for saying, "Know yourself independent from anyone else" and a similar position we find in Alkojito Cartesian, who says, "I think, in this manner I exist"