Styarth prakash 179

(Question) When the conscience that leaves the country, the Brahma ignorant of that country and the country that is attained - the pure soul of that country will be ignorant. In the moment, a wise and ignorant spirit will continue to exist. Apart from this, liberation and bondage will also be eruptant and others can not remember the other's seeing, in fact, the knowledge of the things heard and heard of tomorrow can not remain. Because the time you had seen was the second country and second period; It is the second country and time to remember.

Who says that Brahma is one and why not omniscient? Say that the consummation is different, this also would have been different from that, then it is the root. There can not be knowledge in it. Say that not only Brahma, and not only the incarnation is knowledge, but the intercultural chintabasa has knowledge, even then the consciousness is knowledge by intercession, then why is it a little lesser by the eye? Therefore, due to the use of causal and workmanship, Brahma can not create a creature and God. But the name of God is Brahma and the name of an eternal, unhealthy and amritized organism, different from Brahma, is the creature. If you say that the creature is the name of the speech, then it will be destroyed due to the absence of space, then who will enjoy the liberation of salvation? That is why Brahma Jivas and Jiva Brahma have never happened, neither will nor it will happen.

(Question) So 'Sadev Somyedamgad Aseedekamabadavidyamam' .. -Childhood

How will monism be? In our opinion, without any distinction between any individual, homogeneous and self-organisms separate from Brahma, one Brahman is proved. When the creature is second, how can the Advaita siddhi be?

(Answer) Why are you afraid of this illusion? Know the special adjective that what is the result of it. If the adjective is discriminatory, then say more, 'Admitted light is a special form of fame'. If adjectives are also promoters and publishers, then think that Advaita adjective is of Brahma. In this, the discriminant religion is that separating Brahman from the Advaita object, which is the multiple organism and principle, and the publisher religion of adjective is that one has the tendency of being one of Brahman. Like- 'Asminnagreredioo Dhanhedo Devadatta. Someone said to anyone that the unique wealthy Devadatta in this town and the unique knight Vikramsih is in this army. What proved from this that there is no other dharmadhya in this city like Devadatta and there is no other warrior like Bikramsih in this army. There are few and there are various types of root matter, Pashwadi animals and trees, etc. They can not be denied. Similarly, there is no life or nature similar to Brahman, but it is also low. From this it has been proved that Brahman is always one and the organism and the nature-based elements are many. It is different from them and proving the unity of Brahma is a divine or unique adjective. This can not be the nature of the life or the nature and the lack of the world. But all these are but not equal to Spirit. This leads to disadvantage of non-superstition and non-conformity. Do not panic; Think and understand.