I'm wondering what's the point in the election. Especially once in 5 years. For five years in power, you can do this, as 10 years will be short. I think the rulers should be evaluated by how they came to power. To rule the country is not the cakes oven. This is responsible for the whole people. One can not receive power only by promises, only by actions. And the acquisition of power is the main action by which the applicant should be evaluated. If the challenger constantly "buzit", pits people against power, then he will be such a ruler. Disorder and noise. Moreover, the very meaning of the opposition to power is reduced only in any way to get this power. It is worthwhile to understand that power is the authority, that it is omnipotent. Otherwise, what is its meaning. And the opposition in the last turn thinks about the country or the people. Its purpose is gaining power. As a rule, after the arrival of such forces, a confusion begins.
So, why re-elections, if the authorities are conditional on all. There will be no other rulers. Why these shifts of power, suffers only the people. Previously, everything was calm, ruled as they say until it stops. And everyone lived perfectly. And now, turned the election, not in the choice of the ruler, but in some kind of show, where they choose not for merit, but according to the possibilities.
To each his own. Born to crawl, will not swoop.

image taken from here