Does it really need a blockchain?

in #cryptocurrency6 years ago (edited)
There are still many websites that list upcoming ICOs (initial coin offerings) online. Regardless of how many times people have been warned, the self defeating mentality of "I'll find the next bitcoin" is still quite alive. But, will it always remain the same?



Cointelegraph.com

The magic word


It's not my intention to be insulting with this observation, I'm simply trying to be sincere. Investing is not for everyone, and it's specially not for those who don't like to research, to dig deep. This whole idea that you might just strike oil if you stomp on the ground a little too hard is comical, but also dangerous.

As we know, last year, 2017, was a year of utter craziness. Bitcoin along with many other cryptocurrencies saw one of the most unsustainable bull runs anyone had ever witnessed and this brought forth many of the expected players; the scammers, the hackers, their victims of course, and not too far from that, the gamblers.

It was hard to miss, you could buy almost any ICO and granted you would sell after launch, you were bound to make some return on your investment, but if we think about it for just a second. How was that even a thing? Buying into projects was not done with the idea of supporting an initiative, believing in a blockchain solution. Buying into an ICO was just a gamble to get more BTC, nothing more.

Regardless of where within the rainbow of shadiness a project would lie, hackers, scammers, etc, all they had to do was include the key word, the magical word: blockchain.

You might be surprised to know that an Iced Tea bottling company gave this a go, and their stock went up over night. But, you would be right to ask "What does Iced Tea have to do with Blockchain?" - The answer: absolutely nothing

You have to love the research


If you don't feel like reading about it, if you don't feel like watching videos about it, if you don't understand why the project needs a blockchain to begin with, then the best thing for you to do, and mean this sincerely is nothing.

At this point there are still hundreds if not thousands of cryptocurrency projects that do not need a blockchain. That is, that the problem they are solving, is either a problem that does not gain advantage from being decentralized, or that is not really a problem to begin with.

What I'm trying to say basically is that those who actually look into the white papers, who do a conscious attempt to understand the value proposition of the crypto project, those are the only ones that could possibly even make a judgement, and even though I don't have any hard numbers, I'm confident that the investors who have and are succeeding on this space, are precisely of this curious nature.

Most ICO's fail


The numbers here don't lie, and it doesn't take much to see that what I'm talking about is true. As a matter of fact, there was one ICO last year that raised 40k in just three days, the name, EUT, but guess what it stood for? Useless Ethereum Token, yet people bought it up. That may have been an extreme case mind you, but my point stands.

Today there are plenty of websites that list ICOs, and keep a rating system for them. Now, to me that is somewhat shady, simply because as far as I know, the way the rating system works is not transparent and thus, I'm sure it's manipulated.

As you might imagine some lawsuits have been issued, not only against the ICO's that have defrauded people from millions, but also from websites who list them. The results of those lawsuits have been unimpressive to say the least and the game continues.

One interesting thing about these ICO websites is that if you speak badly about them, you are likely to get a cease and desist letter. That is, if you are someone of notoriety of course, but let's break that down. They are basically protecting themselves from people who want to hold them accountable for pushing or shilling, pick your word, ICOs that have scammed investors out of their money. If that's not ironic, then I don't know what is.

What should you do?


In one word: research - If you want to survive this "game", if you want to be here years from now when the waters have calmed, when we've finally reached adoption, then you must become better in you judgement. Of course, this is only if you are interested in investing, either sweat equity, or actual capital, but there is literally no other way around it that I know of.

To me this bear market has been the mode ruthless teacher of all, and as much as I may say I won't miss it, I'm pretty grateful for the experience, and for having learnt as much as I have. Yes, learning, all the way down.....

Sort:  

As someone on the other side (BUIDLing), I'm heartened to see people like you talking about research and real projects. Most of those directory and listing sites are straight up shakedowns, many of them just scraping data from wherever, not updating info (unless you pay), and/or waiting with their hand out for you to buy a "premium" listing. It's a racket, and if I were advising a friend who wanted to invest, I'd tell them to go straight to the sources (the white papers, the alphas, the team track records) and ignore the hype machinery.

It does get to the point of ridiculous when there are dozens coming out every week with no real discernible value over the others. I am wondering if that will happen with the SMTs when they are available.

Though there is something to be said for projects that have good social media strategies for promoting the initial offering. Airdrops would be a better way of collecting shit coins in hopes of one of them mooning. Investing? Yes research is going to be key and it is best to kep a small play fund for fun as if you were going to a casino.

I'm possibly even done with the little gambling fund... hahahah but no judgement from me if anyone partakes of it.. I rather stick to things I know and understand.

Unfortunately, this practice and trend from last year has also led to a strict oversight from regulators which tend to overregulate as their understand how to adequate protect investors from scams and frauds. This takes them as a whole which leads to uncertainty and an increased decline in demand. Most have and will fail but the fact that the market is no longer as open as it once was can hurt legit and great projects which ultimately slow progress in adoption and technology.


This group of characters is similar to this gold coin

very true, interesting huh

People will be people, ALWAYS, unless we change our educational system and teach new generations how to value their time and how to create values for the communities.

Until then, we will have people trying to find new BTC, as you said. Power and fame are what people are striving for, even tho they all deny it, and that is the main source of their problems. It's like trying to get rich overnight and then doing nothing and ''enjoying life''.

Until they learn what real value is, they will have problems because they don't trust the process. I'm talking here mostly about researching you told.

I don't know a lot about crypto and blockchain and that's why I read posts like these and other ones that will bring me closer to the understanding crypto world. Thanks a lot for sharing your opinions and helping in the growth of the community!

Much love, Mr. Spacely.

thank you for the kind words brother... all the best

Well thought out! Thanks for the insight!

Posted using Partiko Android

thank you for stopping by and for the compliment of course.

Querido amigo @meno, yo aprendo diariamente de ti, cada dia pienso cuanto he aprendido en mi querido Steemit y viene a mi mente personas como tú que explican de manera fácil, temas tan difíciles cpomo la crypto-economía.
Vamos aprendiendo poco a poco, pero a paso seguro.

Again...
THANK YOU!

To listen to the audio version of this article click on the play image.

Brought to you by @tts. If you find it useful please consider upvoting this reply.

Not everything needs a blockchain.

However, if it has a blockchain, it seems to be the latest cool thing.

For instance, my toilet has a blockchain now.

....and someone might question that... and they should.

Cuz I just lied. Do your own research. Toilets don't have blockchains. doh!

Hi @meno!

Your post was upvoted by @steem-ua, new Steem dApp, using UserAuthority for algorithmic post curation!
Your UA account score is currently 6.045 which ranks you at #282 across all Steem accounts.
Your rank has improved 6 places in the last three days (old rank 288).

In our last Algorithmic Curation Round, consisting of 278 contributions, your post is ranked at #58.

Evaluation of your UA score:
  • You've built up a nice network.
  • The readers appreciate your great work!
  • Try to work on user engagement: the more people that interact with you via the comments, the higher your UA score!

Feel free to join our @steem-ua Discord server

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.26
TRX 0.11
JST 0.032
BTC 64799.61
ETH 3102.94
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.83