ADSactly Literature: Benchmark Theater - Look Back in Anger

_source

‘Look Back in Anger’ was the first play to explore the theme of the “angry young man” (a theme later touched upon by Harold Pinter and Kingsley Amis), which basically referred to the generation of working class young men and artists in the post World War II era, who generally shared leftist, often even anarchist political views.

Take, if you will, the play’s main character, Jimmy Porter. Jimmy’s main issue is that he is over-educated and under-employed. He feels alienated in this modern world and feels convinced that he’s living in an Americanized Britain that has left men like him behind. He is a highly intelligent man, yet his only employment is selling sweets at a street stall with his friend Cliff, which makes him resentful and angry. He frequently takes out this anger on his middle-class wife, Alison.

"One day, when I'm not longer spending my days running a sweet-stall, I may write a book about us all. ...It'll be recollected in fire, and blood. My blood."

Cliff often tries to act as mediator between the two, but more often than not, gets caught in Jimmy’s tirades against his quiet wife, whom he blames for everything (from her family’s social status to his own misery).

It’s a profoundly strange relationship, if you think about it. Despite Jimmy’s abuse, Alison remains loyal to him and confides in Cliff that she is pregnant with Jimmy’s child. But before she can tell Jimmy, she receives news her good friend Helena is coming for a visit and Jimmy flies into a rage. He curses Alison and wishes she would know real suffering,

"If you could have a child, and it would die...if only I could watch you face that."

He tells her, unwittingly foreshadowing future events later in the play.

_source

Helena arrives and arranges for Alison’s father, the Colonel, to come and take his daughter home, rescue her from Jimmy, which he does. However, Helena stays behind and begins a romantic affair with Jimmy herself (also becoming the target of his abuse). In the third and final act, Alison returns, looking like a ghost, and tells Helena she has, indeed, lost the baby she was carrying.
The two reconcile and Helena leaves, ashamed of her own behavior and the play ends with Jimmy getting back with Alison in a sort of truce.

‘Look Back in Anger’ is a key example of the realist movement known as “kitchen sink drama”, which basically referred to plays exploring the domestic lives of working class couples, dealing with all sorts of gritty subjects, such as cheating, abortion and even homelessness. It was a different view of the theater altogether and ‘Look Back in Anger’ was considered, by many, revolutionary.

According to Osborne himself, his play was crucially different to British theater at that time because it relied on more “real” feelings. It was Osborne’s belief that up until that point, most plays featured subdued, dull emotions, whereas his focused on raw anger, making it more true to life (a key sentiment for Jimmy Porter, this desire to live a “real life” and escape the monotony of day to day existence).

"Jimmy went into battle with his axe swinging round his head -- frail, and so full of fire. I had never seen anything like it. The old story of the knight in shining armour (sic) -- except that his armour didn't really shine very much."

_source

Another big theme in ‘Look Back in Anger’ is the loss of childhood. This is evident both in Jimmy and Alison. Jimmy’s father died when he was just a ten year old boy, and so, he was exposed to the harsh realities of life at an early age. Alison’s loss of childhood, in turn, happens when she marries Jimmy, in a small act of defiance against her middle-class upbringing.

This loss of life was also evident in the post WWII world. In that case, obviously, the loss of childhood happens because of the World War. Osborne believed that his generation had failed to maintain that sense of innocence that other generations before him had possessed.

Anger, resentment and a loss of childhood – feelings that are so painfully easy to relate to, even today. If Osborne could talk about the loss of innocence in the 50s, what can we say today? Perhaps I’m biased, as I’ve always enjoyed this play, but I honestly think ‘Look Back in Anger’ is just as relevant today as it was 60 years ago.

_{A young John Osborne source}

Interestingly, the play was written in only 17 days on Morecambe Pier and it’s hugely autobiographical. At the time, 26-year-old Osborne was going through a bitter divorce with actress Pamela Lane, who was having an affair with a local dentist and never really believed in Osborne’ dreams or supported him. While a fascinating play in itself, it’s also an interesting window into John Osborne’s mind.

As far as I know, the play is still being produced in theaters around the world, and maybe this post has awoken your interest. Maybe you go out and see it. But if that is not available to you, I highly recommend the 1959 movie version starring an impossibly young Richard Burton (also starring Mary Ure as Alison. After the London production of the play, Ure married the newly-divorced Osborne). In my humble opinion, there can’t be another Jimmy Porter aside from Burton, so give that a look.

Authored by @honeydue

References 1 2 3 4
Original Thumbnail Picture

Click on the coin to join our Discord Chat

---

Vote @adsactly-witness for Steem witness!
Witness proposal is here:

Witness Proposal
Witness Proposal Update

Go To Steem Witness Page
In the bottom of the page type: adsactly-witness and press vote.

Use small letters and no "@" sign. Or, click here to vote directly!
Thank you!

---