Don't Fear Debate. Conclude Debate With Revelation Of Defined Evidences Resulting In Educated Opinion. Debate : "Does failure to enforce on criminal treason create unnecessary threats to sovereignty?"

Don't Fear Debate. Conclude Debate With Revelation Of Defined Evidences Resulting In Educated Opinion. Debate : "Does failure to enforce on criminal treason create unnecessary threats to sovereignty?"

Let's debate the assassination of Glenn Greenwald by those whom information was leaked.

If you're not familiar. Snowden's accomplice in leak where treason account is prominent requires leakers. The leaker of interest in this case is Glenn Greenwald. The ownership of content released placed classification of confidentiality. The nature of reporting included the "exposed us spy program." Had you followed Snowden. You may recall his crudeness when additional articles would appear making claims that Snowden had extracted Presidential emails of international origin. These references are provided to be basic information where as those whom debate can extract information of their own. In this case credibility of evidences reporting may be debunked and seen as clear propagation. For example, the profile picture for PKK Terror watch article share provides report of the FBI's website hacked. At current, there are a multiple of changes in evidences when attempting to recall the same hack. This hack would release what appeared to be registration names and emails extracted from the FBI website. There are still recalls to the emails and passwords registered on this site. Everyone that has ever registered themselves on the FBI website may have motive to wish to assassinate Glenn Greenwald. The same may be true in the case of Sergei Skripal. The common thread between actions of Skirpal and Snowden are well known. Once leaking spy agency informations the threat to Skirpal may not have been known. However, is it a threat to Sovereignty? The method in assassination attempt of Skirpal was one that appeared to be induced for reasons of sustained pain. The state of one whom is poisoned by the oxide is one that is radical. There is no way to expel the poison Polonium from the in complete, and rapid tissue decay from radioactivity may result in organ failure. The suspect is that the spy Skirpal had done something terrible in leaking informations of espionage. The leaks place a direct threat on privacy. The spies whom had informations leaked may be debating of reinitializing documentation of their own existence to prevent attacks on their family due to the nature of the potential in commander status. In the cases of Polonium where reference can be made Yassar Arafat was assassinated by Israeli's according to information that can be retrieved on the subject.

How many have motive to request the Department of Justice aim to process Glenn Greenwald for his accomplice in criminal acts where Snowden is concerned?

The body of those leaked is a large body now known to the public by the password. The nature of leaks and references may be apart from the FBI website hacked reference. However, the conduct consistency may begin to take shape in modern applications of enforcement. It would be a de-evolution created by failures to enforce on serious crimes which warranted reasoning for lynching response. Among the suspects of those with motive to carry out this crime? Should they be watched by the 702 Policy extraction of information that includes international extractions which can be seen as potential violations of espionage laws where warrantless seizure is hostile in it's action.

What elements of interest sustain the ability to witness failures of prosecution for crimes of treason in America?

If we consider the consistency of nature in intent. We have to start with the date of fleeing. I was made a call intercept tool victim the day Snowden fled. Now, you see where my interest in following the story of Snowden appears. I dislike Snowden. I think he is an intellectual. However, I think his criminal conduct also exposes the very agency of espionage that may have threatened my freedoms. I'll place ties and explain. Snowden - Oliver Stone - Milchan.

Snowden - Criminal leaks of treason.

Oliver Stone - Produced Son of Sam Violation film focusing on crimes committed by Edward Snowden in various promotion as well as scripting. The payment to Snowden is one that violated the law in the tier of earnings. To date, it is safe to LEAK this information where as capital gains adjustments would have to be changed to dispute. Whereas, Snowden would have to claim he only profited 9,999 USD and the violation would not be a considerable offense. However, this is not the case.

Arnon Milchan - The center of focus of Case 1,000. Currently reporting sufficient evidences to call for indictment of both Milchan and Netanyahu. The former founder and owner of Sony Entertainment. The corporation was transfered to Daughter Alexandra Milchan. Milchan confesses to strong ties with Oliver Stone in the tell all spy book Confidential. Case 1,000 centers around bribery exposure. Were these acts of criminal deeds as protocol reason for offerings of Pink Champagne?

Furthering ties and criminal intent.

From this point in the timeline. Had the Department of Justice enforced on treason accounts there may be no tie to Oliver Stone. However, perhaps by chance a benefit can be witnessed in further ties clearly providing suspect of family criminal organization. The association of Alexandra Milchan and Oliver Stone is made clear with the purchase of Guantanamo TV. At current, people are not afraid to bring a case against Harvey Weinstein. Legal action requires money. Without it... Legal actions have no choice other than to wait or pray for pro bono which is extremely rare. Congratulations to those whom defend their case with legal action where criminal acts exposures provide judgement and punishments to guilty offenders. If no one brings a case. There is no reason to bring a case up. The tie is clear in proceed of company where Arnon Milchan may have delivered the company to daughter with intent to proceed in enabling propagation arm. The propagation potential is extremely high and Snowden 2016 provides objectivity to those whom become familiar with the content. Treason should not award fame. Instead, treason should provide for necessary trial. However the case of Snowden being held up may have happened. One whom has felt victimized by the agency appearing to go without recourse may have motive to carry out similar assassination attempts on those aiding and abetting treason.

Additional references of infiltration into popular forms of connectivity. @PardonSnowden on Periscope comforts an attempt to pardon treason. The influence of Jack Dorsey and connection to criminal agency defined in this debate can also be considered.

I did attempt to report acts of treason where offenses were made by Oliver Stone and Jack Dorsey to Fresno FBI. The result : Agents hung up twice when attempting to report. A third call was made, reference made that I would record, legally qualifying public live release on VK. I reported the treason and hung up on the person to answer the phone. I fear reporting and I disliked the response when assisting me in my responding to the "see something say something" reporting treason mechanism post call intercept tool victimization.

Do Israeli's have motive to assassinate Glenn Greenwald?

If you consider that the Intercept would reveal that a former employee made bomb threats on JCC's. Than, you must consider those with interest in supporting JCC's may have motive should any such poisoning occur.

DEBATE : WITH INFORMATION OF SKIRPAL ACCOUNT. IS IT SAFER FOR THOSE NAMED IN THIS DEBATE TO BE TRIALED FOR CRIMINAL ACTS THAN TO BE ALLOWED TO CONTINUE TO PRODUCE FILLMS AND MEDIA?

Disclaimer : This post is not made with the intent to command, advise, provide consent, or in request anyone assassinate those mentioned in this information. This post is made with the intent to express my fear in attempts to report criminals to the justice departments of America. I am in fear. However, I feel at no near and present danger. When receiving a request to attend juror duty I began to fell the fear of pending claustrophobia when surrounded by those employed by the American justice system. I suffer from PTSD after PKK terrorist hacks on my corporation website would declare war on the nation of France. I would like to request exemption from juror duty without any disrespect from the Americans liable things including but not limited too; enforcement of justice, the act of protecting and serving, following codes of conduct, ensuring the safety of the people. I respect law enforcement and pray that there is no disability in the ability to enforce with sufficient evidences. This post is made to raise awareness for what I feel is a failure in the Department of Justice systems ability to respond. With all due respect, I find it alarming that the department of justice appears to fail to enforce on the named interests in this debate article.

Relevant post https://steemit.com/entrepreneurship/@sutter/who-is-christian-sutter-and-it-s-april-30th-2018-did-you-know-tron-has-reached-the-10-cent-usd-value-price-on-binance-exchange

@sutter

http://www.christiansutter.com

No answer is correct. And, that makes the @steem-bounty on this one fun! Comments are welcomed!

@OriginalWorks if this qualifies for the writing contest I would like it entered.