Is the latest move of Magic Dice good or bad for the Steem blockchain?
Is the latest move of Magic Dice good or bad for the Steem blockchain?
Image source: https://steemitimages.com.
You probably already know that they updated their token distribution yesterday (on 2019.03.15).
@broncnutz wrote the following about it today (on 2019.03.16):
"this move by magic dice is exactly the same thing the Federal Reserve and the Central banks use to manipulate world currency. the only way this sort of thing stops, is people to just stop playing on the site. The ignorant people who don't understand the harm this causes to our blockchain will still play however.......:("
So, what do you think? Is the latest move of Magic Dice good or bad for the Steem blockchain?
- Good.
- Bad.
- I don't know.
Answer the question at dpoll.xyz.
Voted for
Not sure. But at least they are being transparent.
Posted using Partiko iOS
Congratulations! This post has been upvoted from the communal account, @minnowsupport, by Xplosive from the Minnow Support Project. It's a witness project run by aggroed, ausbitbank, teamsteem, someguy123, neoxian, followbtcnews, and netuoso. The goal is to help Steemit grow by supporting Minnows. Please find us at the Peace, Abundance, and Liberty Network (PALnet) Discord Channel. It's a completely public and open space to all members of the Steemit community who voluntarily choose to be there.
If you would like to delegate to the Minnow Support Project you can do so by clicking on the following links: 50SP, 100SP, 250SP, 500SP, 1000SP, 5000SP.
Be sure to leave at least 50SP undelegated on your account.
Voted for
Voted for
Thanks for contributing to the dPoll content.
You have been upvoted from our community curation account (@dpoll.curation) in courtesy of This Guy... @bluerobo.
Come, join our community at dPoll discord server.
If you want to support dPoll curation, you can also delegate some steem power. Quick steem connect links to delegate:
50SP | 100SP | 250SP | 500SP
Voted for
QE? (quantitative easing, money printing?) I don't know, I'm only supposing
Voted for
Voted for
Voted for