Children of War: Movies of Liberation War
At the beginning of the film, the national flag flying with the national anthem of Bangladesh. Then a date was flashed on the screen - 26 March 1971. Pakistani soldiers started attacking Dhaka, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman announced the independence of Bangladesh by dragging a microphone placed on the secretariat table in the words of the shootings.
This is the first movie of the movie Children of War. Although the fact of declaration of independence did not happen in this way, the film's acceptance of the metaphorical presentation was accepted. This part raises the shock, though the date is to be March 25th. Because the declaration of the independence of Bangabandhu went away on March 25, 12, in a number of pre-polling centers including the EPR headquarters.
The movie Children of War was initially named The Bastard Child, but later the name of the censor board was changed. Thank you to Mrityunjay Devvrat and Soumya Joshi Devvrat for making the film. Although they are foreigners, they have made a film about our great liberation war. The movie was released two years ago. I just met that day. It is also necessary to discuss the inconsistencies for publishing the film. Because there is some sense of historical film that can not be avoided.
Cinematography is the most beautiful of the movie. The filming excellence helped to get corporate success. The film's very weakness may not be seen by an Indian or any non-Bangladeshi. But as a Bangladeshi, many of the weaknesses of the movie have been caught in my ordinary eye. Contrasts are very visible because the film is widely discussed, appreciated and rewarded. The result was a huge expectation. Prosperity first shocks in the second scene. As far as I know the director has done enough research and studies before making the film. Still, it was not understood why to import so much unrealistic scenes. The general events of 1971 were quite tragic, there was no need of drama imposed here.
Incomplete one : In the second scene of the picture, we see, in the middle of the night, a journalist who is listening to Bangabandhu's declaration of independence sitting in his bedroom, is writing a news / article for sending it to a newspaper. The magazine will take people to come. Shortly after the calling bell blew. The door opened and a little boy stood on the hat, he came from the magazine to take the writing.
After the March 25, 1971, a bloody Dhaka city was launched in the capital Dhaka that could publish articles written on the declaration of independence of Bangabandhu and in the middle of the night, the boy in the basket was sent to the journalist's house to collect the news. (Bangladeshi Muslims mean tunes, Surma in front, Kabalamarka hat on their head, they all speak Comilla regional language, even though they are the top journalists of Dhaka - this is the trademark of Bangladeshis in the eyes of Indian directors). What an incredible discreet one thing.
Not only that, after closing the door with the envelope in the boy's hand, the singer's wife danced in the posture of the teenager, and then the couple met in Anand Jangme. Needless to say, in 1971 the people who have some idea about the reality of the city of Dhaka, how it will look.
And thereafter the door was hit. Pakistani soldiers broke into the door and entered the house. In such a situation, how people behave in such a way that they would not be so far away from the reality. The unarmed journalist Khamaka will show heroism in the film's heroic dialogue with a heroic dialogue, but if the number of rigging clips increases, then it fails to bring credibility. Even after such an attack on the Pakistani soldier, the journalist will be beaten with a light weight. And rape her beautiful wife and take her along. I have no idea that nobody has seen any good person in Pakistan since 1971. But the journalist is the hero of this movie. The hero of the movie can not be killed in the first scene.
I said, since the hero should keep alive, he should not have seen the scene of jumping on the Pakistani officer. It was totally unbelievable that the people who were innocent in 1971, the Pakistani soldiers did not spare any of them, and one would come back with an attacking gentleman.
Incident two : The freedom fighters hold the list by holding the rajakars camp in the camp, giving information, it is also an opposite scene. The opposite happened happened. Razakars tortured the freedom fighters to collect information. It is also shown here that in an attempt to ambush the Pakistani army officer in ambush, one is trying to get him to speak.
Inconsistency Three : A teenager starring a prominent character has made some incredible scenes. A group of soldiers attacked by a group of refugees attacked and killed everyone. But the boy is survived, he snatched a pistol from a Pakistani soldier's waist and shot him after shooting him. At that time, the rest of the soldiers are inactive and go to the invisible place to give a chance to show heroes. The teenager and her younger sister remained intact and continued their journey.
Incidental four : From the beginning of the movie the teenager took her sister to India's border with India. But after a few months of being cut, they could not reach the border due to lack of directives. At the end of the war, the teenager shot down dramatically when it reached India's border. He wears a 303 rifle with three star-based uniforms and backs. Where did he get this military uniform from, the director can say good.
Incidental Five : In another scenario, the teenager and his sister travel around in search of food and find a rice and rice in a abandoned house. After feeding the rice there, a group of refugees appeared in the night while the teenager sticks to his hand. The refugee party wants one night's shelter for the teenager. Then the teenager appeared in an extravagant drama, saying that it is his village, his house, he is not willing to give shelter to anyone. Why did the teenager do not understand the role of Khamaka in an inhuman role, though in the next scene, in the later stage, the Bengali movie became mixed in the same team.
Examples of more inconsistencies can be found. After such scenes, the scene is so much imposing dramatism, so much incredible view, that fatigue came to see. After the end of the movie, the annoyance is rather resentful.
Let's say the last annoyance. A gathering scene was shown several times from the beginning, which has probably been referred to the Shahbagh movement, where the trial of the war criminals is about to be judged. At the outset, that part of the public meeting was shown, then it was not understood what was the public meeting. When it comes to the last scene 42 years of talking is clear. But the age, personality, speech of the leader of the movement that has been selected, is so delicate that the scene can not create any emotion. On his speaker's speech, Sarabha in the eye, Punjabi wearing, The regional language of Comilla - as usual is that Bangladeshi trademark. It was very annoying in it. I also see this trademark in Indian cereals. It is not understandable about what kind of consternation or communalism it is. The JoyBangla slogan seems to be the most intriguing. There is a melody of this slogan. This is widely publicized. The net could also be cleaned out by searching and searching. But why not do it. If the slogan has been given in the movie, then you want to lock it.
There are many things to say. Conclude conclusions in one line. We want to see the historical movie is true. But do not want anything incompatible. The purpose of making this movie is great, but due to the weak script, I did not like the movie. My average rating is 10 at 4