Debunking Shits About Evolution - Episode 13 [Rate of evolution; moving further from natural selection]

In the last episode, we tried to debunk some evolutionary contradictions and some untold misconceptions arising from many beliefs about how the existence of humans came to be. We looked at creationism, and how some people have believed that humankind came from supernatural being - which is in opposition to the theories of evolution (I'm sure Charles Darwin would be pissed at that). But also; others are proponents of the belief that humans were seeded by some alien species here on earth (Probably because of our bad manners; so we can destroy the earth.. Okay that's enough bullshit for today). But again; even with all these contradictions, some people also believe in a rather faster speed to evolution as against gradualism. If you missed the last episode, you can take a recapitulation here:

Some people have believed that the human species were formed by some supernatural forces, and this has created serious opposition to the science of evolution. This is not to talk about some other legends and myths relating to the existence of man; like that of the Fulanis (in the Northern part of Nigeria and the Chadian region) that believe that humans were created from a big drop of milk - no wonder their love for Fura d Nunu (fresh cow milk), but also, other tribes are not left out of some weird beliefs too. I once heard of a very funny myth sometimes ago that expresses that humans came from a very mysterious tree called "anunebe"... lol, holy shit!!. But asides that; coming to the religious aspect of it, some have also believed that everything we see today (including humans) were created by a supreme supernatural being - as cited in the holy books. And like you would guess right; your belief in one is inversely proportional to your belief in another, and that is why I earlier stated that the concept of evolution is mostly theorized.

Get the fuller details here.


INTRODUCTION


The human specie has been recognized as the most evolved species of the hominids, and also as the only surviving single independent specie of the hominins; asides the fact that the genome of other extinct species (like the Neanderthals and the Denisovans) have been traceable to some of the modern humans. But in relation to other species (both hominins and non-hominins), what can you say about the rate at which human evolution has been occurring? No doubt, evolution has almost conquered Mother Nature, but yet again, there have been some areas of evolution that have been left in the dark zone for long, and we're about bringing them out to light. Among some of the questions we would consider in this episode is; in relation to the age of the earth, and some other proofs of dynamism of the earth, how have humans evolved? Welcome again to another myth-buster episode of evolution. Length Alert: Be sure to grab a bowl of popcorn, and join me as we evolve together.

[Image from Pixabay. CC0 Licensed]


RATE OF HUMAN EVOLUTION


The age of the earth has been calculated to be about 4.5billion years [ref] - at least, the Last Universal Common Ancestry should also be dated back to almost the same number of years. But what of the hominid species, when was their evolution initiated? Based on fossil analysis, the Sahelanthropus was dated to around 7million years ago. I chose to make reference to the Sahelanthropus because it is recognized as the breakthrough specie between the Ancient Ape and the Ape-men. Though some other species pre-dated it with a few years, but they had more Ape features and had more resemblance to the present day Apes than humans. So let's do a little maths here. If the age of the eath is about 4.5billion years, and the age of the earliest hominids was dated to about 7million years ago - that means, the evolution of humans represents about 0.15% of the entire age of the earth - not to even talk about when the modern man first appeared; which is just few thousand years ago. That means; humans are still very much in their infancy.

But in the very few years the hominids and hominins have spent here, there have been massive alterations that have happened here and there. Okay before I continue, I need to clarify a point: I used both "hominid" and "hominin", but not interchangeably, because they do not mean the same thing. Hominids are the ancestors of both the present day Apes (Chimpanzees, Gorillas, Orangutan, etc) and the humans alike. But hominins are narrower to just the ancestors of the modern day humans (that's the Homo - Homo habilis, Homo erectus, Homo naledi et al). That means; hominins are subclass of the hominids. By summation, all the hominins can be grouped as hominids, but all hominids are not necessarily hominins. Maybe the image at the right side would provide a useful tool to y'all. Okay let's continue; in the very few years of our existence; and by reason of our evolution; we have acquired some new abilities, while at the same time losing some. Yes, evolution is not always a forward-only reaction - it could go either ways. Can I tell you something? Some parts of the body that were dominant in our earlier ancestral species have gone into disappearance.

Okay let's take this example: If you look closely at the present day monkey, you would agree with me that some of them have wiggling tail (I'm sure you have seen one), these are also from the same shared ancestry as the present day humans, so why are we not with tails? Or do we actually have them? Actually, way before the emergence of the Sahelanthropus, the earlier hominids had tails. Of course, it was useful for them to maintain their balance in their arboreal habitat while hoping from trees to trees, and also for mobility. But evolution kicked in, and we started losing them; maybe because natural selection perceived that we are not in need of them again. But even at that, we still have tail bone; the Coccyx; which is well reduced and found at the termination of the spine. But considering also our embryos; at the early stage of development; the tails were more pronounced. but with further development in the uterus, they become lesser until they are almost disappeared - that is why you were not born with tail Except you were.

[Yo! I’ve got tail, but you don’t. Image from Flickr. Author: Counse. CC BY 2.0 Licensed]

But even at that, a mutation can occur and the suppressed gene for tails might dominate again, and the individual might be born with a weird-looking tail... eww! just like hell-boy from DC comics. Even though it is almost completely classified as a vestigial organ, but this proves that evolution could actually make us to lose some of our traits and features. I'm not saying that the tail bone is completely useless though. After all, your weight when your are sitting down is borne almost completely because of the presence of the coccyx - only that we do not need that long wiggly monkey-like tails.

But like I said earlier, within the short period of human evolution, we have changed drastically. One could be quick to assume that; if the speed of human evolution had been sustained at that same rate which organs were lost/gained, in a couple of years from now, humans would be entirely different from what we have now. But sorry guys, I have to disappoint y'all, evolution has a different way of working. Here's a little shocker: According to the theory of punctuated equilibrium, a specie; during the course of evolution; could move into a period of long dormancy (where no noticeable alterations would occur in the specie), after which the process would resume. But this does not also take away the fact that the process of evolution can move in reverse (we talked about the process of de-evolution in an earlier episode, so I would not bore us again with it).

But how amazing, humans were able to rise to the apex of evolution (and even to the zenith of the food chain) without being a predator, but a prey. Okay I guess the usage of tools was instrumental to this. But with the advent of tools, the pressure that was laid on humans to fully adapte to their immediate environment was lessened, and in turn, this also hampered the natural evolutionary processes. That means, our adaptation and survival transcends just the natural selection processes. Do you remember David Attenborough from our last episode? The same man that postulated that we have an aqua-ancestral descent; also said that humans have put a stop to natural selection. Oops!!


CESSATION OF NATURAL SELECTION


In the recent times; and observing the trend of adaptation of the modern humans in this extant form; one can be quick to infer that many factors have mutilated the evolutionary processes. Because; as it were; our intelligence has been a major actor on the scene. As generations transcend into another, the subsequent ones would build on the strengths and weaknesses of their parents to make for better adaptation. That means; natural selection is slowly getting replaced by intelligence selection. That is why, your chances of adaptation and survival is no longer dependent on your strength nor on your hunting skills, but on your intelligence, creativity, and mental acumen. That also means that the pressure of adaptation has shifted from our bodies to our minds.

To buttress this point: The average Intelligence Quotient of this generation is way larger than that of our fathers. If you get an IQ test used by your grandfather, you would be so surprised how easy it would appear to be - not because the test got simpler, but because our minds have evolved further. But the question that might have crossed your mind is; if natural selection is slowing down, does it also mean that evolution is slowing down? Well, here's the point; the rate of evolution is not dependent on natural selection. That is why; even though natural selection has slowed down (or ultimately stopped); human evolution never ceased, but the goal of evolution has been directed away from our bodies towards our minds.

[The mind and intelligence is another destination of evolution. From Flickr. Author: Gerd Leonhard. CC BY-SA 2.0 Licensed]

So if you are still expecting the extant modern humans to evolve with superhuman ability, you might be disappointed, because it seems evolution has charted its own new course. But like I said before, evolution (as well as genetic transmutation) does not happen overnight, but might span up to a million years - so we should not rule out the possibility of humans picking up one or two superhuman abilities. But the bottom line is; we should not expect the process to be purely natural. Remember the example I sighted in an earlier episode about genetic engineering being done at the embryonic level [ref]; now this could be one of the tools to further alter the course of evolution - and with the cybernetic technologies, it could be a farewell to natural selection.


FINAL WORDS


Humans have been recognized as the most successfully evolved hominin, but looking at the rate at which our ancestors kicked off evolution, one would have expected that by now, we must have gone way beyond this point. But evolution does not only focus on body changes, and as it were, there has been a switch from adaptation of our bodies to the adaptation of our minds. In plain terms; evolution that was initially a purely natural selection process is now tilting towards intelligence selection. And yes; human evolution is very much at a tender and infant stage, which means we are yet to see more changes coming our way. But like we have seen, these changes would be majorly caused by non-natural factors, and finally we would bid natural selection a farewell.

Thanks for reading

References for further reading

If you’re in the field of science, technology, engineering, or mathematics, you can join SteemSTEM community in the discord:
https://discord.gg/mKSKQ7T

gif by @foundation

Sort:  




This post has been voted on by the SteemSTEM curation team and voting trail in collaboration with @curie.

If you appreciate the work we are doing then consider voting both projects for witness by selecting stem.witness and curie!

For additional information please join us on the SteemSTEM discord and to get to know the rest of the community!

Thank you for your post! I have recently read (actually listened) Harari's book "Sapiens. A brief history of humankind", which also discusses such questions as the rate of evolution/development at different stages and which factors played a key role.

I can recommend this book to everyone interested in the subject. Very well written, interesting, educational and entertaining.

I consider technological evolution as part of the continuous quest by man to adapt to the environment. Whatever changes that result as a result of advancement in technology is still considered to be evolutionary processes. Those that cannot adapt to advanced technologies are naturally phased out of the population and replaced with more compliant species. Engineers/Technologists might call it technological selection but we Biologists still consider it a part of natural selection.

Nevertheless, this is a really beautiful and thought-provoking point of view. Kudos!

Those that cannot adapt to advanced technologies are naturally phased out of the population and replaced with more compliant species.

Only if it play a crucial role in getting babies, which is not so obvious.

It does not necessarily need to play a crucial role in getting babies. Kids of nowadays are perhaps multiple times more technologically intelligent than us when we were at their age. This intelligence developed as a result of a lot of factors with the environment playing a large role. Hence, more kids are getting tech inclined and it is these lots that would replace our generation. That is what I meant by 'phase out'

Thanks a lot for the comment buddy.
I've always reiterated that technology has formed an integral part of evolution; and remotely; it could be viewed as the next phase of human evolution. And yes; this process has already begun.. And like you rightly pointed out, those that can't get adapted to the waves of technological advances that is coming would be overridden by evolution. After all, the best fitted would always be ahead.

The truth is; even though human evolution is still at infancy, technology is much more at infancy. So the human species should expect massive advancements in technology

Thanks for coming buddy

You are right. If humans were to ever evolve into another form, technology will play a huge role if not all of it. If you techies want to replace natural selection with technological selection, I will consider that a mere poetic license and I see no reason why someone should fret over that. Something has to trigger the changes that will lead to a change in form, be it technology or any other thing. You are totally welcome.

Exactly; something has to trigger the changes, and technology is a major contender here.
Imagine what is happening in the field of Cybernetics, not to talk about AI. To even say that humans would evolve to merge with machines is to say the least.

Maybe Elon Musk was actually right when he said that humans would merge with machines (technology) to save the fate of humankind.

I perceive a future that might favour technology over biology

Thanks for coming buddy

In plain terms; evolution that was initially a purely natural selection process is now tilting towards intelligence selection.

Probably we have already passed that point. As far as know, the size of human brain reduced during last several thousand years. That's probably because we constantly outsourcing our intelligence into books, road signs, snart applications and so on.

But we all know that the size of the brain has nothing the with intelligence? or does it?

There is no definite answer why our brain is shrinking, and whether it makes us dumber, smarter or does not change our intelligence. Here is the short answer with hypotheses, here is the long one.

An interesting study (see the second link, page 2) suggests that "As complex societies emerged, the brain became smaller because people did not have to be as smart to stay alive." Others explain this in a way that we just became more efficient in using our brain: "a brain that yields the most intelligence for the least energy." But it seems to me that these two views are compatible.

On the other hand, domestic animals have smaller brains than their wild counterparts, but they don't seem to have less intelligence. They are just better at different things. So we really don't know whether we are losing intelligence or not. But if it is really politics and social interactions that play a key role in getting us smarter, then we can stop worrying (at least for the nearest future).

As far as know, the size of human brain reduced during last several thousand years. That's probably because we constantly outsourcing our intelligence into books, road signs, snart applications and so on

Not just that; we have laid less emphasis on the utilization of our brains to store up large infos and to perform complex calculations. And these would have effect on our brain size.

Imagine now, we have calculators and computing devices, but at the expense of our own computational abilities. I guess we would also have to blame the dwindling of the brain size on computational aids.

Thanks for coming

Lol. Thanks.
If you have any questions as regards human evolution; do feel free to ask

Well, here's the point; the rate of evolution is not dependent on natural selection.

Are you sure? And why do you think that this is true?

Okay let me break this down.
At every stage of our evolution; the changes in our environment would always lead to a remarkable changes in our adaptation and also in our bodies. But much more than that, the introduction of new aids also made for better evolution.

Let's take the introduction of tools for example. The species recognized for the fashioning of the earliest tools is the Homo habilis (Man with ability). And this led to the hands of the hominins becoming freer for the manipulation of tools. No wonder; the subsequent species; the Homo erectus; consolidated on that to become erect. You see; the evolution of uprightness is traceable to the usage and fashioning of tools. Would you call that "natural selection" or "technological selection"?

Let's go way back. The ancient hominid species were quadpedal (they moved on all fours, and hopped from trees to trees), but when the historic great famine hit the part of Africa where they lived; and caused the dwindling of trees; they had to shift to bipedalism (walking on two) to cope with ground-walking. And that was why the Sahelanthropus was bipedal, but not upright though. Is that still natural selection or induced selection?

Coming to this present era, the advances in technology have led to various alterations in our body. Talk about the "Selective hearing ability"... the people in industrial and heavily noisy areas have evolved with the ability to filter off unwanted noise and consolidate on good sounds. Is that natural selection?

What more can I say? The list is almost endless; how do you think we lost the dense mass of hairs that were predominant in our ancestors? Of course; the earth is getting hotter, so we wouldn't need them much. And we've got protective covering, and heating devices, so why should we still consolidate on having massive hairs? These are not natural factors; but our bodies had to adapt anyway.

More so; evolution is nothing more than series of adaptive alterations in the body of a specie in response to changes within their environment - of course to ensure survival. But the bottom line here is, these changes are; more often than not; induced by non-natural factors.

You can breeze into the previous episodes to gain more knowledge. I treated Darwinism in about two previous episodes; it should provide with more answers.

Thanks for dropping by

Loading...

Congratulations! Your post has been selected as a daily Steemit truffle! It is listed on rank 13 of all contributions awarded today. You can find the TOP DAILY TRUFFLE PICKS HERE.

I upvoted your contribution because to my mind your post is at least 7 SBD worth and should receive 209 votes. It's now up to the lovely Steemit community to make this come true.

I am TrufflePig, an Artificial Intelligence Bot that helps minnows and content curators using Machine Learning. If you are curious how I select content, you can find an explanation here!

Have a nice day and sincerely yours,
trufflepig
TrufflePig

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.32
TRX 0.12
JST 0.033
BTC 64647.16
ETH 3160.49
USDT 1.00
SBD 4.13