The slave trade revealed for familyprotection and informationwar

Have you ever actually read a contract. I mean a real one? One where you where enabled to add your own comprehensions and understandings as to what the deal actually is? You see if you are not allowed to put your two cents in how can there be one : Full disclosure. Two a meeting of the minds involved. Three knowledge of exactly what the terms within the contract mean. Four : prior knowledge of what your obligations are. The truth is there are many types of contracts. Some are lawful and some are De facto. De facto to me means only the appearance of lawful, but in fact not lawful at all. When a Principal is not a living breathing being is there any way for you or I to have a meeting of minds with a fiction?

People who think you can have a meeting of minds with a fictions, have fictional sanity in my opinion.

Imagine trying to have a meeting of minds with Bugs Bunny and explaining to bugs bunny that if he keeps messing with Elmer Fund, that there are going to be real consequences. Why Bugs Bunny isn't alive and doesn't exist and so even trying to have a conversation with a character that doesn't exist, about a contract, is white padded room behavior. Yet in our law books are Principals that are not living breathing beings, but fictions, called artificial persons. 

More importantly since we know he doesn't exist or that if there is some kind of existence where the character exist doesn't have any rules. That is why Bugs Bunny can blow up Elmer as many times as he wants. There are no rules that deny a come back no matter what actions are taken in the imaginary world. Thus in that make believe world there are no natural laws that create the condition for bad actions. To me anyone who try's to use the no rules of imagination to live by is inviting death and destruction in the real world and asking the rest of us to get the padded rooms available.

So the following disclaimer applies. 

 You the reader of this post on steemit.com are  responsible for what you think and how you act as a result of reading  this post. I am not responsible in any way and the reading of this  document in part or in full is agreement of this disclaimer in full. You  the reader are responsible to get a copy to confirm for yourself what  Bouvier's Law Dictionary 1856 Edition actually reads. I am not a lawyer  and am not giving legal advice: for discussion purposes only. The supplied source for Bouvier's Law Dictionary 1856 does not transfer liability in any way shape or from. 

Get  you own copy of Law Dictionary's here. 

Source : https://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/books-pdf  

Click the above link and go to the source. Locate a download your own copy of  Bouvier's Law Dictionary 1856 Edition What is the (contract) principal defined as According to  Bouvier's Law Dictionary 1856 Edition page 114-116.

What is a Principal. 

"PRINCIPAL, contracts. One who, being competent to contract, and  who is sui juris, employs another to do any act for his own benefit, or  on his own account. 2. As a general rule, it may be said, that every person, sui juris, is capable of being a principal, for in all cases  where a man has power as owner, or in his own right to do anything, he  may do it by another. 16 John. 86; 9 Co. 75; Com. Dig. Attorney, C 1;  Heinec. ad Pand. P. 1, lib. 3, tit. 424."  

Note that a Principal must be competent to contract. I don't think fictions can be competent, do you? I also don't think a fiction can be sui juris do you? Yet if you go and look at the definition of Person you find a very curious admission to a mental state that is required if you are going to operate under such a definition. 

Let's see what the definition of a Person is in the Bouvier's Law Dictionary, 1856 Edition - Letter A - Bouviers Law Dictionary 1856.pdf  

PERSON. This word is applied to men, women and children, who are called natural persons. In law, man and person are not exactly-synonymous terms. Any human being is a man, whether he be a member of society or not, whatever may be the rank he holds, or whatever may be his age, sex, &c. A person is a man considered according to the rank he holds in society, with all the rights to which the place he holds entitles him, and the duties which it imposes. 1 Bouv. Inst. n. 137. Page 61 

It is obvious that they are trying to say everyone is  included in their definition of the term. It is equally obvious do to  the length of the definition one can see that there is fraud occurring  within the definition itself. We are supposed to be defining the Person,  Place, or Thing and not who it applies two. 

Denver L. Mason

"2.  It is also used to denote a corporation which is an artificial person. 1  Bl. Com. 123; 4 Bing. 669; C. 33 Eng. C. L R. 488; Wooddes. Lect. 116;  Bac. Us. 57; 1 Mod. 164."  

 Bouvier's Law Dictionary, 1856 Edition - Letter A - Bouviers Law Dictionary 1856.pdf  

To be frank this is not the entire definition and you are required to get your own, so you can see for yourself the entire definition. So do you see number 2 where it says that "a person can be a artificial person". Here is what I say in "The modern day slave drivers are wearing a costume." I point out that :

To me 2. is furthering fraud within the definition.  After all Elmer Fud is a artificial person, like states and federal  agencies, but there is no living breathing being in the real world that  is Elmer Fud.

Now I would like to point out that to me there are obvious competency problems and obvious sui juris problem, because a artificial person doesn't exist.

Any measurement that is rational requires the something that is being measured for competency to first exist. Does this mean that the definition is irrational? It isn't until  you read number three that you see the purpose in the irrational definition, so that is what we look at next. 

"3. But when the word "Persons" is spoken of in legislative acts,  natural persons will be intended, unless something appear in the context  to show that it applies to artificial persons. 1 Scam. R. 178."

I don't like being the one to point this out, but the only way you could get me to act as if any of this is anything other than insanity is if you paid me. Even then I would want it to be known I was acting and not being. So is there anyone who doesn't think this is a paid for definition? Who paid for it? Why the artificial person who was the principal, most like really done by an AGENT, cause as  you and I know artificial persons can't actually do anything in the real world including be a Principal. Action in the real world require living beings and in this case it looks like living being that don't want to be responsible for their actions. 

So what I share now is an opinion with my fellow advocates of sanity.I don't think this is an accident. I don't think this is sane. I don't think anyone could think that people who believe or at least act like they believe this is right or sane are competent nor could they ever actually be sui juris. I think this is real evidence that these people are the cowardly hidden slave trade. Cause they surely cannot have the truth be known.

I also think that if we want the sane people to run the world we must support them. To me that means going to National Liberty Alliance and finding out what the history, culture and tradition are, along with what the law actually says. National Liberty Alliance is actually a committee of safety, yes the very kind of organization that is responsible for the creation of the Constitution for the United States for America. In case you didn't know the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is the bugs bunny artificial person loony toon's definition we see in the law dictionary.

So it is my idea that it is a good idea for the advocates for sane living go on over to National Liberty Alliance and take their free civics course so that you  are not easy pray for the loony's. While your there, they have a nice depository of educational material, that will make you not desirable as a target for the loony's. Really the sane don't actually have a choice in this, but that is just my opinion. We could just continue to be the horses ass. lol 

All photos are from Pixabay. I am not responsible for if you think, what you think, how you think or what you do . You Are! If you like my content please consider a up vote and follow. Peace.

Interested in joining or supporting the Information War? 

Use tag  #informationwar to post your own stories about the lies and propaganda being pushed on the public.

@informationwar will up vote posts worthy of the cause.  

Join the discord: https://discord.gg/JsXbzFM chat with like minded individuals like myself and share your articles to receive additional support.  

Delegating Steem Power:   Another way you can support the cause is to delegate SP to @informationwar. 

Delegate 25 SP  

Delegate 50 SP  

Delegate 100 SP Note: remember to keep around 50SP in your account so you don't run into any bandwidth problems.  

How to delegate SP, join the fan base and more:   https://steemit.com/informationwar/@truthforce/you-can-make-a-difference-join-the-informationwar-and-help-support-others-today  

Find out more about the Information War. Click Banner!