DAILY WALK WITH GOD 10 - IN-DEPTH STUDY OF CAIN & ABEL PART 1

in #forgodsglory6 years ago (edited)

DailywalkwithGOD1.jpg

Cain & Abel

Twin brothers

Genesis 4: 1-2 Now Adam knew Eve his wife, and she conceived and bore Cain, and said, “I have acquired a man from the Lord.” 2 Then she bore again, this time his brother Abel. Now Abel was a keeper of sheep, but Cain was a tiller of the ground.

I know you know the story of Cain and Abel but there are some interesting facts that I discovered which I would like to share with you. To begin with: Cain and Abel were twin brothers. To prove the point, we have to look at two parts in the Bible where birth is given. In Genesis 29:32-33 where it states that Leah conceived and bore a son, and then she conceived again and bore a son. Note that there are two conceptions and two births. But notice how it is worded in Genesis 4:1-2. says that: Now Adam knew Eve his wife, and she conceived and bore Cain; And again, she bore his brother Abel.
Notice that there is only one conception, but two births. The Hebrew word for "again" is asaph, meaning to add something, in this case, the birthing of Abel was added to the birthing of Cain. Cain and Abel were twins. Although they were twin brothers, Cain was still born first and therefore we can say that Cain was the oldest. It is important to remember it because later it will tell us why Cain was so angry that he killed his brother.

In Hebrew, Cain means to acquire or possess something that is why Eve said "I have gotten/acquired (qanah, also from the root QN) a man"
On the other hand, the name Abel means vain or vanity (Gen 4:1). It means to be empty of substance.

In other words you will agree with me that Cain was a possessor, one who has a reflection of character and substance while Abel was the one without substance.
The assumption we can make is that Cain thought he had a higher authority than his younger brother. Let's keep this all in mind as we look at the sacrifices brought to God.

According to the Biblical text, Abel was a shepherd. The KJV uses the word "keeper," but the Hebrew word ro'eh means shepherd. Cain was a "tiller of the ground." The Hebrew word translated as "tiller" is o'ved, which literally means a "servant." in Genesis 3:23 where it states that when Adam was expelled from the garden he was sent to "till" (avad) the ground. Therefore, Cain, who is the older of the twins, takes on the profession of his father, a very common occurrence in the Hebrew culture.

Their Sacrifices

Genesis 4-7 In the course of time Cain brought to the Lord an offering of the fruit of the ground, 4 and Abel brought of the firstlings of his flock and of their fat portions. And the Lord had regard for Abel and his offering, 5 but for Cain and his offering he had no regard. So Cain was very angry, and his countenance fell.
6 So the Lord said to Cain, “Why are you angry? And why has your countenance fallen? 7 If you do well, will you not be accepted? And if you do not do well, sin lies at the door. And its desire is for you, but you should rule over it.”
When the two brothers brought their sacrifices to God, God had respect for Abel's sacrifice, but not for Cain's.
We are not told why Cain's sacrifice was not respected. (King James Version)

I've always thought that Moses received the first commands but apparently, it's not so because, in this story. we can make the following assumption that God gave rules to Adam and Eve and their children and that Abel obeyed it, but Cain didn't.
According to what we read in the following text section, it appears that God warned him that sin lies and waits at the door, but according to the Hebrew translation, it is not the case. Instead, God warned him against his flesh that rules over his spirit.

And to prove this point of view, we have to look what is the meaning of the following words:

Genesis 4:6-7 And the Lord said unto Cain, Why art thou wroth? and why is thy countenance fallen?
7 If thou doest well, shalt thou not be accepted? and if thou doest not well, sin lieth at the door. And unto thee shall be his desire, and thou shalt rule over him. (King James Version)

It is very important to know that all name words in Hebrew are male or female. The word sin is "female". This is proving the point above that God did not point to sin, but to a person. Otherwise, it should have read as follows. "And unto thee shall be "hers "desire, and thou shalt rule over "her".
We come to the conclusion that God refers to a person and not to sin. In this passage, God actually tells Cain to let go of his jealousy over his brother. According to the Hebrew translation, that there was a possibility that Abel wanted to take over the leadership because he felt superior to Cain as his sacrifice was accepted by God. Because Cain always had authority over his younger brother, he now thought that his younger brother would take over the authority because God accepted his sacrifice and not his. And he could not accept that. Also, remember that Cain's character was one of substance and Abel's was of vanity.

Thank you for reading, part 2 will follow soon, don't miss it!

May you be blessed abundantly by this study!

Source: www.ancient-hebrew.org - The untold story of Cain and Abel

Henryklein.jpg
@scotty777

Sort:  

Dear @scotty777,

Thank you for your insights concerning the account of Cain and Abel.

Here are some of mine:

Abel is translated from the Hebrew word Hebel (heh'-bel) and means “breath.” The Hebrew word “hebel” can also mean “vapor” or can be taken figuratively meaning “vanity” (as you used in your post). A breath or a vapor is something that is brief and fleeting. Abel may have been a prophetic name indicating that his life would be cut short

Some people have suggested that Cain's offering was unacceptable because he offered plants while Abel offered animal sacrifices. Of course, without blood there is no remission of sin (Hebrews 9:22). While this passage foreshadows salvation by the sacrifice of the Lamb of God and that we cannot be saved by our “works,” I don't think that necessarily this is the reason that the Cain’s sacrifice was unacceptable.

Although the grain offering was a bloodless sacrifice, God not only accepted grain offerings when the sacrificial system was instituted but in some cases required them. In fact there was a time in Israel’s history that because of the rebellious attitude of the people that animal sacrifices were meaningless in the eyes of the LORD.

“The multitude of your sacrifices— what are they to me?” says the LORD. “I have more than enough of burnt offerings, of rams and the fat of fattened animals, I have no pleasure in the blood of bulls and lambs and goats. Isaiah 1:11

The passage does give us some insight into what made their sacrifices pleasing to the LORD or not. It says that Abel brought fat portions from some of the firstborn. He not only offered the“firstfruits” of his flock, he also offered the choicest parts. Abel was clearly giving the best of what he had to God. Cain, on the other hand, brought some of the fruits of the soil, and not the firstfruits. The portion he offered may have been damaged or what Cain considered “leftover.” Abel's and Cain's actions were a reflection of their attitudes towards God. Was the LORD God worthy to receive their very best offering or not?

I did a 7 part series based on the Hebrew language and culture called, "Revealing the Mysteries of the Bible." The links are found on the following post:

VIDEO: ALL OF CREATION BEARS THE IMAGE AND LIKENESS OF OUR DIVINE CREATOR
https://steemit.com/christianity/@lastdays/video-all-of-creation-bears-the-image-and-likeness-of-our-divine-creator

If you find the video enlightening, you may enjoy reading one or more of the posts in the series. I would appreciate it if you took a few minutes to view the video and then would let me know your comments about it.

Shalom. Blessings in Yeshua, Steven Sherman @lastdays

Apps for your valuable contribution to my post God bless.

Dear @scotty777,

You are very welcome!

God's blessings to you as well.

Steven @lastdays

great. God bless you for this exposé. But I'm not quite clear about this part 👇

The word sin is "female". This is proving the point above that God did not point to sin, but to a person.

It's true that Hebrew words, not only name but sometimes ordinary verbs and pronouns even have masculine and feminine gender but how can a word "desire" mean "hers" s OK nice every word has a masculine and feminine gender?
Can we make that conclusion about every word in the bible, by drawing conclusion that they refer to human?

The Hebrew terms used in this verse are exactly the same ones spoken to Eve in Genesis 3:16. These are from the root words tashuwqah, translated "desire," and mashal, translated "rule over." Despite sin's "desire" for control over him, Cain must "rule over" his temptations and not give in.

Hi LOVE YOUR POST MAN!!! LIKE MY POST TOO!!!!! HERE IS THE LINK: https://steemit.com/bots/@abusereports/last-minute-upvote-list-2018-05-02

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.26
TRX 0.11
JST 0.033
BTC 63746.34
ETH 3048.25
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.97