Self-Censorship and Toxic PC Culture

in #freedom6 years ago

We are living in an increasing climate of absolute political correctness where the smallest comment may be perceived as offensive and can trigger a massive shitstorm that has far reaching consequences. Today I want to give my perceptive on zealous political correctness and the outrage culture.

Political Correctness

Political Correctness is on its own nothing that would be bad. In essence it is trying to be a nice person and not offend anyone with your behaviour. In theory this should be one step stronger than the non-aggression principle because even being offensive is rejected.

Pc+culture+in+a+nutshell+centerour+ancestors+would+be+ashamed_9b8a81_6289273.jpeg

The problems start there. It is not possible to not offend anyone. A religious statement may offend certain religious atheists. An atheist statement may be offensive to religious people. We have even come so far to call it offensive that christianity or islam states that some people will go to hell. It is easy to see that no statement can be made at all on religion, sex, gender, whatever without potentially upsetting somebody. I would even go so far that any statement that is completely non-offensive is not a statement at all.

For this reason political correctness has developed into a type of crusade where it is very much okay to blame some group while the feelings of a different group must be protected at all costs, portraying these people as incredibly fragile while their adversaries are evil monsters. The first group is obviously everything that is right of the centre, while the second group is anyone that is not a white cis straight male.

PC culture leads to self-censorship

My first problem is that such a culture of political correctness does lead to self-censorship. When there is a discussion on a topic I really care for I will always speak out, also against PC resistance. Most of what I love is offensive to others, get over it! But on topic I do not care for particularly I have noticed myself wanting to give my perspective, but then thought it is not worth the backlash and easier to just shut up.

download (12).jpeg
source

Of course there are statements that are problematic and these will always have consequences. But many people are just struggling to deal with their own life and do not follow an agenda of hate. Yet they find themselves silenced on various topics out of the fear to say something wrong. If you are not an active leftie researching a few hours a day the latest trends a simple conversation may seem like a minefield that is impossible to navigate. And this is not affecting a small minority, it is a large part of the centre and the right.

Toxic PC culture pushes people to the right

Apart from destroying productive communication and open discussion PC causes the centre to shift right. Every time somebody does decide to rather shut up out of the fear to get some little detail wrong, they perceive this as a micro-agression against their freedom of expression and social participation. This accumulates over time into a real hate. Who opposes the PC warriors? Obviously the right wing offenders that suddenly appear as the friend of the 'ordinary' people.

Did you think people will be convinced by silencing them or shouting at them??? That just causes a defensive reaction; they will stay silent and wait for their opportunity until they can finally show their discontent. For example by electing the orange fuehrer.
Pushing a zealous PC culture does not make the world a more friendly place, rather the opposite. For example gay acceptance has been rising steadily and is now starting to go down again source! Because people blame the gays for your bullshit.

Hate always creates more hate. That does include all types of hate, also the self-righteous hate of the left. The real distinction is not between left and right, it is between hateful and peaceful people. And there are more than enough haters in both, the left and the right.

PC culture protects assholes

The final problem is that it has become so easy to discredit anyone that has a valid but non standard position. There are now so many assholes that protect themselves from criticism by trying to shut up their opponents using the PC army. Please realise that by blindly joining the outrage you are just a tool easily controlled by a few power-hungry narcissists.

Individualism

If you want to promote a pluralistic, friendly and respectful world, you need to act that way. Should intolerance be tolerated? Absolutely so. Because promoting ideas is not a fight where one wins and one looses. So it should not be performed in that mindset. If you want to change someones opinion the first step is to respect that person and discuss in a friendly atmosphere. Try to understand that person, what do they think? how do they feel? Don't lecture, but listen.

avatar-313453_1280.jpeg
We are al unique, source

Any separation of people in groups is not helping. It reinforces the idea of us vs them. Men vs. Women, gay vs straight. We are not groups, we are all individuals and our goal should be to build a prosperous shared future. A future that respects individual rights, where we do not try to silence or punish people that have different opinions, but we try to promote our own ideas by setting positive examples.

If you happen to identify on the 'left' (where left vs right is nothing but another useless separation of people), why do you not try to live your ideals and let others see them applied in practice? Because right now what people see in the left are just angry controll freaks and nobody wants to be like that...

Sort:  

You had my attention for the first part - but your argument started to fall apart for me when you started to split this up as “left and right”.
I like your example: “It is not possible to not offend anyone. A religious statement may offend certain religious atheists. An atheist statement may be offensive to religious people.” - but I don’t accept that this is a problem sitting on a spectrum of left and right.
Please correct me if I’ve misinterpreted this, but you seem to be blaming this entire problem on the “left” at one point you state:
“If you are not an active leftie researching a few hours a day the latest trends a simple conversation may seem like a minefield that is impossible to navigate. And this is not affecting a small minority, it is a large part of the centre and the right.”
Again - I just don’t accept your position here. A well articulated starting position just turns into what I see as an “us against them” position where a particular group is being demonised - this just doesn’t look like the constructive argument I thought you were about to make based on the start of your post.
Your post then meanders back into something I absolutely agree with, you state “Any separation of people in groups is not helping. It reinforces the idea of us vs them.” - so why the separation to left and right earlier in the post? I think the issue you describe is quite real, I just think it’s a far more complex topic than a simple left and right divide where one side is the offender and the other side is the defender of rights - again, this is my interpretation of what you’re saying and I’ll happily accept a correction if I’ve misunderstood.
As I’m sure you can tell by now, I started drafting my response before finishing reading everything you were saying - but I’m just as confused as when I started typing.
You sum up the article with “If you happen to identify on the 'left' (where left vs right is nothing but another useless separation of people), why do you not try to live your ideals and let others see them applied in practice? Because right now what people see in the left are just angry controll freaks and nobody wants to be like that...”
You appear to be contradicting yourself, you’ve mentioned that left versus right is a useless separation of people but you still appear to be blaming the left - you’re asking a specific group of people why they have the problem, but this is a specific group of people you have grouped together.
Can you please help clarify this as it looks like a contradiction between what you’re saying the answer is and what you appear to be doing.

Posted using Partiko iOS

I think I mostly agree with you, the left/right paradigm is not helpful and PC culture is not the fault of an ominous 'left'. It is caused by people but these tend to identify themselves as being left.

I think that certain statements can be made about groups, but these should only be expressions of facts. When I say that PC culture is largely created by left-identifying people, I think that is a correct statement. But I should not start to blame the 'left' for it, just the individuals that are actually responsible.

In fact I used 'left' and 'right' a little to generous in the post, which was at least partially laziness on my side.

This post is promoted by @reversed-bidbot with 0.186 steem!

Sorry, all funds have already been claimed.

Excluded from participation are: bidbots, autovoters.

Follow me to also earn steem on my other promoted posts. For more details please visit my discord server or read my introduction post

Curated for #informationwar (by @openparadigm)

  • Our purpose is to encourage posts discussing Information War, Propaganda, Disinformation and other false narratives. We currently have over 7,500 Steem Power and 20+ people following the curation trail to support our mission.

  • Join our discord and chat with 250+ fellow Informationwar Activists.

  • Join our brand new reddit! and start sharing your Steemit posts directly to The_IW, via the share button on your Steemit post!!!

  • Connect with fellow Informationwar writers in our Roll Call! InformationWar - Leadership/Contributing Writers/Supporters: Roll Call

Ways you can help the @informationwar

  • Upvote this comment.
  • Delegate Steem Power. 25 SP 50 SP 100 SP
  • Join the curation trail here.
  • Tutorials on all ways to support us and useful resources here

Congratulations! This post has been upvoted from the communal account, @minnowsupport, by frdem3dot0 from the Minnow Support Project. It's a witness project run by aggroed, ausbitbank, teamsteem, someguy123, neoxian, followbtcnews, and netuoso. The goal is to help Steemit grow by supporting Minnows. Please find us at the Peace, Abundance, and Liberty Network (PALnet) Discord Channel. It's a completely public and open space to all members of the Steemit community who voluntarily choose to be there.

If you would like to delegate to the Minnow Support Project you can do so by clicking on the following links: 50SP, 100SP, 250SP, 500SP, 1000SP, 5000SP.
Be sure to leave at least 50SP undelegated on your account.

Hi @frdem3dot0!

Your post was upvoted by @steem-ua, new Steem dApp, using UserAuthority for algorithmic post curation!
Your UA account score is currently 2.852 which ranks you at #11459 across all Steem accounts.
Your rank has dropped 29 places in the last three days (old rank 11430).

In our last Algorithmic Curation Round, consisting of 304 contributions, your post is ranked at #174.

Evaluation of your UA score:
  • Only a few people are following you, try to convince more people with good work.
  • The readers like your work!
  • You have already shown user engagement, try to improve it further.

Feel free to join our @steem-ua Discord server

I would even go so far that any statement that is completely non-offensive is not a statement at all.

Priceless.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.26
TRX 0.11
JST 0.033
BTC 63722.47
ETH 3049.10
USDT 1.00
SBD 4.03