Replacing Weapons with Wisdom: Our Children Will Know The Politics Of Today Is Mostly Based on Superstition.

The more that people deviate from true wisdom and balance, the less they are respected and the more struggle they will experience. A direct effect of this is that their perceived survival struggle and 'missing' respect from others sometimes leads them to think they must then use weapons and 'shows of force' to be 'respected'. The most militarised nations on Earth tend also to be the ones who are most lacking in acceptance of empathy/intuition and thus also who lack real love, real connection with others and thus then also lack respect for others and from others.

When there is harmony that can be felt, the lived experience can also be harmony and peace - with true collaboration, team work and co-existence being the norm. Such harmony is the polar opposite to weaponisation and conflict - peace can literally never be achieved through violence - even when it has been rationalised that the violence is 'defensive'.

When two or more groups who lack wisdom, respect (for self/life/others) and balance are drawn into conflict together - the situation is truly perilous, since neither is likely to be awakened rapidly enough to stop the carnage. This is the situation in many places on Earth today - with massive death and destruction being relatively close at any given moment.

'We are One' is not just a nice idea

---

No amount of 'diplomacy' or 'sanctions' or other forms of control can replace real wisdom and balance.

When there are differences in worldview, understanding, belief and action which constitute threat to the existence of one or more groups, it is up to those groups to look at what is being reflected back to them by their imagined 'opponent'.

'We are One' is a reality, it is a literally true, absolute fact of existence - there is only one 'thing' experiencing itself through all of us. With this in heart and mind, it is apparent that therefore - any example of elements of 'the one' that are fighting each other, is also an example of 'the one' fighting itself or 'self vs. self'. Just as it is possible for an individual human to have multiple personalities and internal fragments that don't like each other - so too does 'the one' suffer with the same imbalance. It is entirely possible for one group of humans to be acting as a mirror for another group who are in denial of aspects of themselves - the amount of denial within the originators determines the form of and amount of denial in the reflection presented by the 'others'.

What is shared in both the individual (micro) and world (macro) level situations here is a combined lack of acceptance and also a lack of willingness to examine things deeply enough to know what's really occurring. This shallow understanding of reality is a form of denial which has lead us almost to the point of total annihilation. The only way to resolve this is through a combination of radical discovery of deep truth and a willingness to be open to the called for changes. Rabidly holding on to old traditions and beliefs without consciously examining them to test their validity is no wiser than throwing virgins into a volcano to appease the 'fire god'. Future generations will look back on the mainstream political and social viewpoints of today and know that many of them are superstitions, just as we look back today on the thoughts from several hundred years ago and think the same.

Superstition?

---

'Superstition' is one of the most ironic words in the English language since it's current definition itself displays superstition!

1 a : a belief or practice resulting from ignorance, fear of the unknown, trust in magic or chance, or a false conception of causation
b : an irrational abject attitude of mind toward the supernatural, nature, or God resulting from superstition
2 : a notion maintained despite evidence to the contrary

Source: Mirriam Webster Dictionary

Let's break it down:

a belief or practice resulting from ignorance, fear of the unknown

This I agree with.

trust in magic or chance

This is a 'loaded' definition, since it assumes that magic is not real in any useful way and therefore to trust in its use is to be ignorant of 'reality'. However, when it is understood that the mechanics of the universe can absolutely be understood and used in powerful ways that result in spacetime becoming malleable, it is abundantly clear how magic can be very real indeed.

a false conception of causation

I agree with this.

an irrational abject attitude of mind toward the supernatural, nature, or God resulting from superstition

This is a nonsensical definition since it is circular. We cannot define a word and include the same word in the definition. This is like saying that : An apple is apple-like. Such a definition is of no use at all.

a notion maintained despite evidence to the contrary

I do not agree that the holding of ideas despite evidence that appears to contradict the ideas is superstitious. Often there can be evidence that suggests two opposing views are both correct and often there will be evidence missing. Maintaining a position while remaining open is not superstitious in the slightest. If, however, there is significant evidence against the ideas and there is little or no evidence in support of them AND the individual holding the idea is closed off from change due to unknown reasons or causation then I agree that their position is bordering on superstition, at least. However, I think that the first definition (1a) covers this sufficiently.

Political Superstition

---

So I am saying here that many of the political positions being held up in the world and behind which much power and money is put are indeed ideas that are the result of ignorance and even fear of the unknown.

For example, the paranoid idea that many American governments have perpetuated, that 'x,y,z nation hates america and hates America's freedom' and thus Americans must fund a massive arsenal of weapons, ready to kill in massive ways at the drop of a hat (or bomb) is one that is based in ignorance of the very points I made at the start here.

Typically, the vast majority of people in the nations identified as 'threats' to America, actually like the freedom that it is claimed that they hate. They aim to be more free in that way and it is often mostly their self appointed 'leaders' who project any of the war talk or hatred towards America. However, in many cases, their hatred is not random or irrational - it is entirely valid hatred, based on the hypocrisy, violence and denial that America has perpetuated around the world for so long - behind a veil of propaganda material that claims they are the 'world police' or other such ideas that are really only intended to thinly justify their government (corporations) building economic empire.

I strongly suggest watching - Apologies of an Economic Hitman, if you are unclear of the extent to which America's government agencies have covertly overpowered and made a mockery of democracy around the world for decades:

When we fail to honestly look at our own mistakes and learn from them - plus project onto others as if they are the only ones who are acting out of balance, we can quickly find that we have become the monster that we are claiming to exist somewhere 'out there'.

The idea that the world can have peace if we just develop more weapons and have more people signing up to kill others is just as outrageous an idea as any of the witch-hunt beliefs of the 'dark ages' (or anything you see in this Monty Python sketch):

Wishing you well,

Ura Soul

Vote @ura-soul for Steem Witness!

View My Witness Application Here

_{(Witnesses are the computer servers that run the Steem Blockchain.
Without witnesses there is no Steem, Steemit, DTube, Utopian or
Busy... You can really help Steem by making your 30 witness votes count!
Don't forget, there are more than the 50 witnesses you see on the witness voting page in steemit.com)}

Find out your voter rank position at steemocean.com!

I run a social network too!