---

Look at the bottom of this glass of tap water that was distilled in my city and see the silt, dirt, and heavy toxins left over!

The water is distilled (turned to water vapour) and moves out to another container, and this is left over in the bottom of the container.

---

It may be different from city to city of course but I am in Canada, east of Toronto where "water quality" is supposed to be good.

We pay ridiculous taxes, for such clean water of course. This is the supposed great Western civilized world where everything is great, shiny ponies and unicorns exist and the government and media looking after us and reporting truth to residents can never do wrong by.......

We the People.

---

---

Top Resources for you on this subject today:

--

Please use the resources here today to learn the issues and the facts before you comment. No matter what side of this you are on.

This is not a conspiracy theory. The chemical and medical evidence and FACTS -- are overwhelming and actually pretty simple.

This poison is being dumped in water supplies worldwide and ruins your health. Short and Sweet.

They will always be here. I may keep blogging on this issue in the future. I've addressed it here before.

We are all in this together.

--

http://fluoridealert.org/

http://cof-cof.ca/

http://fluoridealert.org/issues/health/brain/

---

Resources I own or run where I pulled photos, memes, some info from today along with above sites:

--

-- https://www.facebook.com/barrydutton/media_set?set=a.10151431831120915.539605.584855914&type=3

-- https://www.facebook.com/FluorideFreeOshawa/

---

VIDEO: Dr. Paul Connett

- World Renowned Fluoride Expert.

I Appear In & Put This Video Together w. Activists:

---

The following video is a 2 hour and 13 min. resource I put together.

I drove to Toronto, Ontario, Canada in 2013, to shoot this footage with world renowned anti fluoride activist Dr. Paul Connett of the #Fluoride Action Network ( http://fluoridealert.org/ )

I have run the Fluoride Free Oshawa group for years and have been politically on the record as opposing fluoride. I have documents from the Regional Health heads stating where the fluoride comes from tied to US fertilizer plants and that it costs WELL in excess of $100k/year.

I am the fellow in the blue suit sitting RIGHT in front of the camera, right in front of Paul. I do make several statements in the video. I was glad to work with the Fluoride Free Toronto group to promote this event and awareness of this issue.

Whether you are pro/anti fluoride -- or just learning about this toxic political soup poisoning your kids and families and pets, please watch this video.

Dr. Connett is a WORLD WIDE SPEAKER AND EXPERT on this issue.

Most people tied to the state / pro fluoride agenda, refuse to debate him on camera or in public because he is so well versed and prepared.

You can challenge a lot.... but you want a medical opinion that opposes the general statist agenda on this?? --- Here it is.

Facts.

Today in the Fluoride Market:.. (Racket is appropriate also)

And that's what it is when you know where it comes from & why it's allowed....

---

This Week in Fluoride!

--

TWO MAJOR LEGAL VICTORIES IN FEDERAL COURT CASE TO END WATER FLUORIDATION

— Source: Mercola.com | May 22nd, 2018 | By Stuart Cooper - By way of FAN.org

Excerpts from FluorideAlert.org:

http://fluoridealert.org/news/two-major-legal-victories-in-federal-court-case-to-end-water-fluoridation/

--

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

• Fluoride Action Network (FAN) is among a coalition of environmental, medical and health groups suing the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to ban artificial water fluoridation

• FAN has recently won two major legal victories, defeating efforts by the EPA to dismiss the case and limit the evidence that can be considered

• Legal experts say the lawsuit will be precedent setting and increase other challenges to EPA chemical rules by environmental watchdog groups

--

Complete Story Expanded:

--

By Stuart Cooper
Campaign Director, Fluoride Action Network

In November 2016, the Fluoride Action Network (FAN) together with a coalition of organizations and private citizens, including Food & Water Watch, American Academy of Environmental Medicine, International Academy of Oral Medicine & Toxicology, and Moms Against Fluoridation, presented a petition1 to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) calling on the agency to exercise its authority to prohibit the addition of fluoridation chemicals to the public’s drinking water supplies under Section 21 of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA).

FAN’s petition was made on the grounds that a large body of animal, cellular and human research shows that fluoride is neurotoxic at doses within the range now seen in fluoridated communities, and included over 2,500 pages of scientific documentation detailing these health risks.

The Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) allows individuals to petition the EPA to regulate and prohibit the “particular use“ of a chemical if the petitioner can show that it presents an unreasonable risk to the general public or susceptible subpopulations. TSCA specifically gives the EPA the authority to prohibit drinking water additives.

However, in an attempt to put up an unreasonable roadblock the EPA dismissed our petition based on a questionable interpretation of Congress’s recent amendments to TSCA. In response, FAN and our coalition partners filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California legally challenging the EPA’s denial of our petition.

It also prompted the Natural Resources Defense Council to file an amicus brief challenging EPA’s strained interpretation of the law.2 Since challenging the EPA in court, a lot has happened to move us closer to a successful outcome. We have won our first two battles in federal court, new government-funded research has been published which strengthens our case, and our day in court has been scheduled.

• Two Legal Victories as EPA Tries to Dismiss Case and Limit Evidence

The EPA’s motion to dismiss FAN’s petition was heard November 30 by federal Judge Edward M. Chen, of the Northern District Court of California in San Francisco. Our attorney, Michael Connett, argued the motion on behalf of FAN. Only days before Christmas, the judge gifted us our first legal victory. December 21, 2017, Chen denied the EPA’s motion3 to dismiss the case. This ruling was covered by Reuters4 and various legal and regulatory journals.

Two and a half weeks later, on February 7, 2018, we won a second major legal victory. This time, the EPA tried to put up another roadblock by limiting the scope of discovery. In other words, EPA worked to prohibit our attorneys from obtaining internal EPA documents, and to prohibit our experts from relying upon recently published studies. According to Chen:5

The text of the TSCA, its structure, its purpose and the legislative history make clear that Congress did not intend to impose such a limitation in judicial review of Section 21 citizen petitions. The Court therefore DENIES the EPA’s motion.”

Connett noted:6 If you look at the legislative history, Congress wanted a robust mechanism for citizen oversight over EPA. This court’s decision highlights for environmental groups that Congress created a powerful tool. Had the EPA prevailed we would have been prohibited from including any new fluoride neurotoxicity study published after our petition was submitted in November 2016, including the landmark U.S. government-funded 12-year study7 by Bashash et al. published in September 2017. This study is critical in demonstrating that fluoride is neurotoxic and has no place in the public water supply.

• New Government-Funded Research Links Fluoride to IQ Loss

It is difficult to overstate the importance of this new study,8 published in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives, linking fluoride levels in the urine of pregnant women with lower measures of intelligence in their children. This is especially true because it was funded by the following U.S. agencies: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and the EPA. As noted by the authors:

“In this study, higher levels of maternal urinary fluoride during pregnancy (a proxy for prenatal fluoride exposure) that are in the range of levels of exposure in other general population samples of pregnant women as well as nonpregnant adults were associated with lower scores on tests of cognitive function in the offspring at 4 and 6–12 y old.”

The authors from several universities in Canada, the U.S. and Mexico followed over 300 mother-child pairs in Mexico City for a 12-year period. They found a strong relationship between the mothers’ exposure to fluoride (as measured in their urine) and lowered IQ in their offspring at 4 and again at 6 to 12 years of age. The urine levels of the pregnant woman in the study were the same as is found in pregnant women in the U.S. (0.5 to 1.5 mg/Liter, or ppm). At these levels the authors reported a staggering loss of six IQ points.

Most of the Mexican women had urine fluoride between 0.5 and 1.5 mg/L. Studies have found that adults in the U.S. have between about 0.6 and 1.5 mg/L, almost exactly the same range. From the low end of that range to the high end is a difference of 1 mg/L, which is what caused the five to six IQ-point difference in the children of the study mothers.

Furthermore, the study was very carefully conducted by a group of researchers who have collectively produced over 50 papers on the cognitive health of children in relationship to environmental exposures.

The lead investigator of this study, Dr. Howard Hu from the University of Toronto, commented on the quality of the study in the Canadian National Post,9 “This is a very rigorous epidemiology study. You just can’t deny it. It directly related to whether fluoride is a risk for the neurodevelopment of children.”

This new study thus helps to confirm the health risks described in our petition, and will be an invaluable piece of evidence for our attorneys as they develop our case over the next year.

It has also inspired a FAN campaign called Moms2B Avoid Fluoride. We launched the campaign in April to advise pregnant women to avoid fluoride, particularly fluoridated water, because of the potential for harm to the brain of the fetus. With your help, we can educate the next generation of parents, so they can take action to avoid fluoride exposure during this critical time in the development of their child.

• The Next Step — Discovery and Our Day in Court

The judge has scheduled the trial for the beginning of August 2019. This gives the FAN legal team less than 16 months for pretrial procedures. Thanks to the court’s recent ruling, we have the right to obtain various internal documents from the EPA through a process known as “discovery,” which will last up through November. We will also have the right to depose EPA’s experts under oath.

Our legal team will also be recruiting our own expert witnesses for the trial, including experts in developmental neurotoxicology, endocrinology, epidemiology, toxicology and risk assessment. According to Connett, “These experts will be needed to explain how fluoride affects the brain and how the levels that Americans now ingest in fluoridated areas are in the range at which harm can occur, particularly among vulnerable populations.”

• Fluoride Lawsuit Opens Door to More Citizen Petitions; Attorneys Urge Industry to Help EPA

According to legal experts who’ve been quoted in related news coverage, FAN’s lawsuit will likely be precedent setting in determining how the court deals with citizen petitions for chemical regulation under TSCA going forward. Experts have also said our case is likely to inspire an increase in the filing of citizen petitions and lawsuits by environmental, animal welfare and public health watchdog groups to compel the EPA to enact safer regulations on toxic chemicals.10

Watchdog groups no longer have to convince the EPA of unreasonable risk; they can now have an objective judge decide based on an independent review of the evidence. Because of Chen’s ruling to deny the EPA’s motion to dismiss our case, TSCA law will now be interpreted to allow the EPA to be petitioned to regulate single uses of substances, rather all uses, which was the EPA’s position. This change will make it easier for activists to force the EPA to review the risks of specific chemicals used commercially.

In response to our success, some attorneys for industry have publicly called on industry groups to follow and help defend the EPA’s position (or lack of action on regulating toxic chemicals).11 But we will continue on, and will keep our focus on providing the Court with the best available evidence on the risks of adding industrial fluoride chemicals to over 200 million Americans’ water supply.

• TSCA Lawsuit Timeline and Media Coverage

You can learn more about our lawsuit against the EPA using these additional resources available on our website and updated regularly:

Watch a video presentation by Attorney Michael Connett, providing a primer on our TSCA lawsuit -- --

See a timeline of our lawsuit -- http://fluoridealert.org/researchers/government-reports/timeline-the-tsca-law-suit-against-u-s-epa/

Read the full TSCA petition submitted to EPA November 22, 2016 -- http://fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/epa-petition.pdf

Read a shorter eight-page summary of our petition -- http://fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/Summary-TSCA-petition.nov_.2016.pdf

Read the documents submitted into the court record -- http://fluoridealert.org/researchers/government-reports/the-tsca-law-suit-2017-2018/

See media coverage -- http://fluoridealert.org/news/?country=united-states&sub=tsca-lawsuit

• Invest in an End to Fluoridation

FAN has been the leading educational and advocacy organization campaigning to end the reckless practice of water fluoridation throughout the world for over 17 years. We are up against governments with huge budgets to defend outdated policies, special interests with big money, ill-informed professional bodies and a largely oblivious media, which keeps the public, and itself, in the dark on the issue.

With each passing year, our effort gets more and more urgent because of the continuing revelations of the dangers posed to our children, especially with respect to the development of their brains. The latest example is the September 2017 Bashash study12 — the most important fluoride/IQ study to date — which we discuss above.

There are now over 220 animal studies that link fluoride exposure to the disruption of various aspects of brain function, over 40 studies that show fluoride interferes with the ability of animals to learn and remember and 52 human studies that have associated exposure to fluoride with loss of IQ.

And some of the best of these studies have been carried out at doses exceeded by many children in fluoridated communities.

Using standard risk assessment techniques, former U.S. EPA risk assessment specialist William Hirzy, Ph.D., has shown that 1.4 mg/day is associated with a lowering of IQ by five IQ points in one well-conducted Chinese study16 (Xiang et al., 2003a, 2003b).

We cannot allow this practice to continue to harm the public. With your support, we can make ending water fluoridation the greatest public health achievement of the 21st century. Our historic lawsuit offers both a significant opportunity for an end to the practice, as well as an opportunity for you to play a key role in making it happen.

Please consider investing in our efforts by making a tax-deductible donation to the Fluoride Action Network, a project of the American Environmental Health Studies Project.

Fluoride Awareness Week -- May 20-27!

.
*See original article and comments to article at https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2018/05/22/two-major-legal-victories-to-end-water-fluoridation.aspx?utm_source=dnl&utm_medium=email&utm_content=art1&utm_campaign=20180522Z1_UCM_NB&et_cid=DM208802&et_rid=312369332

— This is more big news!

Recent Important News:

USA Fluoride Lawsuit Update: FAN/ Fluoride Action Network:

--

-- Covered in detail in my Episode #19 of this series:

https://steemit.com/health/@barrydutton/e-19-or-fluoride-and-other-toxins-in-your-municipal-water-supplies-are-poisoning-you-they-re-full-of-cancerous-neurotoxins-and

via:

https://www.globalresearch.ca/water-fluoridation-victory-in-legal-case-to-force-the-u-s-environmental-protection-agency-epa-to-end-the-addition-of-fluoride-to-the-public-water-supply/5630754

--

Excerpts from this big news/case! :

--

More exciting news for the concerned citizens around the world working tirelessly to educate Municipal Councillors and Government officials on the dangers of ingested fluoride aka Hydrofluorosilicic Acid added to the drinking water supply.

-- FAN (Fluoride Action Network) wins second round in court case!

On February 7, 2018, the Fluoride Action Network (FAN), together with a coalition of environmental and health groups (see Plaintiffs below), won a second major victory in our legal case to force the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to end the deliberate addition of fluoride to the public water supply (water fluoridation).

Our victory was the ruling from Federal Judge Edward M. Chen, of the Northern District Court of California, when he dismissed EPA’s motion to limit discovery:

“The EPA moves for a protective order limiting the scope of review in this litigation to the administrative record, a request that would effectively foreclose Plaintiffs from introducing any evidence in this litigation that was not attached to their administrative petition. The text of the TSCA, its structure, its purpose, and the legislative history make clear that Congress did not intend to impose such a limitation in judicial review of Section 21 citizen petitions. The Court therefore DENIES the EPA’s motion.”

Key Court Document:

--

http://org.salsalabs.com/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=5knzE13MjtWuNU97A0gjEKRPw7T7rj6O

Our attorney, Michael Connett, noted: “If you look at the legislative history, Congress wanted a robust mechanism for citizen oversight over EPA. This court’s decision highlights for environmental groups that Congress created a powerful tool.” (Inside EPA, Feb 20,2018)

Had the EPA prevailed we would have been prohibited from including any new fluoride neurotoxicity study published after our Petition was submitted in November 2016. With the court’s ruling we can now include the major 12-year study by Bashash et al. published in September 2017. This study is critical in demonstrating that fluoride is neurotoxic and has no place in the public water supply.

The Bashash Study:

--

It is difficult to overstate the importance of this study, especially since it was funded by these U.S. agencies: National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and the EPA.

The authors from several universities in Canada, the U.S. and Mexico, followed over 300 mother-child pairs in Mexico City for a 12-year period. They found a strong relationship between the mothers’ exposure to fluoride (as measured in their urine) and lowered IQ in their offspring at 4 and again at 6-12 years of age. The urine levels of the pregnant woman in the study were the same as is found in pregnant women in the U.S. (0.5 to 1.5 mg/Liter, or ppm). At these levels the authors reported a loss of 6 IQ points.

The lead investigator of this study, Dr. Howard Hu from the University of Toronto, commented on the study in the Canadian National Post: “This is a very rigorous epidemiology study. You just can’t deny it. It directly related to whether fluoride is a risk for the neurodevelopment of children.”

This study adds another level of scientific rigor to our case. We should never deliberately expose an unborn child or bottle-fed infant to a known neurotoxic (i.e. brain-damaging) substance but that is precisely what we are doing every day with water fluoridation.

Our TSCA lawsuit is attempting to force the US EPA to end this reckless practice. As Michael Connett stated in response to EPA’s attempt to dismiss our case: “in a nation besieged by neurological disorders of poorly understood etiology, both in young children and the elderly, minimizing exposures to known neurotoxic substances must be a public health priority [page 4].”

Below, is the list of Petitioners and Individuals in the lawsuit and some important details on the latest news. Also, you will find the TSCA timeline to date.

It’s just a matter of time when ALL decision makers realize that citizens have rights, and, the autonomy to protect those rights.

IT’S OUR HEALTH ~ IT’S OUR RIGHT ~ IT’S OUR CHOICE!

Kindest Regards,

Liesa Cianchino

Chair Concerned Residents of Peel to End Fluoridation

Founding Member Worldwide Alliance to End Fluoridation

(CA)Past Board Member (US)Moms Against Fluoridation

Permanent & Updated Quick Links to the FAN Lawsuit:

• TSCA Lawsuit Timeline and Media Coverage

You can learn more about our lawsuit against the EPA using these additional resources available on our website and updated regularly:

Watch a video presentation by Attorney Michael Connett, providing a primer on our TSCA lawsuit -- --

See a timeline of our lawsuit -- http://fluoridealert.org/researchers/government-reports/timeline-the-tsca-law-suit-against-u-s-epa/

Read the full TSCA petition submitted to EPA November 22, 2016 -- http://fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/epa-petition.pdf

Read a shorter eight-page summary of our petition -- http://fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/Summary-TSCA-petition.nov_.2016.pdf

Read the documents submitted into the court record -- http://fluoridealert.org/researchers/government-reports/the-tsca-law-suit-2017-2018/

See media coverage -- http://fluoridealert.org/news/?country=united-states&sub=tsca-lawsuit

More Info

Screenshots:

Bottled Water:

--

• Bottled water is likely around 90% crap too, not just because the sources cannot be trusted, most of them have fluoride in them.

• Factor in the leeching of the plastic into the water. Esp. in hot cars, or while stored for weeks or months, BEFORE you get it.

• Look back in my series here a couple episodes, we had an actual water plant mgr from the midwest comment in very strong language similar to you, and then some.

• Research various home purification methods like a Berkey water filter, or RO (Reverse Osmosis) filter with UV if possible, and or distilled.

• All methods have benefits, and drawbacks, like with most things in life.

The IAOMT:

--

-- is a global network of dentists, health professionals, and scientists who research the biocompatibility of dental products, including the risks of mercury fillings, fluoride, root canals, and jawbone osteonecrosis. We are a non-profit organization and have been dedicated to our mission of protecting public health and the environment since we were founded in 1984.

The IAOMT is concerned about the many sources of fluoride and health risks from this exposure.

--

Sources of human exposure to fluoride have drastically increased since community water fluoridation began in the U.S. in the 1940’s. In addition to water, these sources now include food, air, soil, pesticides, fertilizers, dental products used at home and in the dental office, pharmaceutical drugs, cookware (non-stick Teflon), and an array of other consumer items used on a regular basis. Most people are not aware of important fluoride facts about these sources.

Exposure to fluoride is suspected of impacting nearly every part of the human body, and the potential for harm has been clearly established in scientific research. A 2006 report by the National Research Council (NRC) identified a number of health risks associated with fluoride exposure. Susceptible subpopulations, such as infants, children, and individuals with diabetes or renal or thyroid problems, are known to be more severely impacted by intake of fluoride. Since such populations and all people can potentially be impacted by fluoride exposure, consumers need to know these crucial fluoride facts.

Given the current levels of exposure, policies should reduce and work toward eliminating avoidable sources of fluoride, including water fluoridation, fluoride-containing dental materials, and other fluoridated products, as a means to promote overall health.

--

They provide several resources / links, here are a couple.

https://iaomt.org/resources/fluoride-facts/fluoride-exposure-human-health-risks/

https://3wsw4k3ihv8vobohr3qsiut5-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/Selected-Quotes-about-Fluoride-Warnings-from-the-IAOMT.pdf

https://iaomt.org/resources/fluoride-facts/artificial-water-fluoridation-understanding-risks/

Did You Know?

Senator Bernie Sanders declared a dental health crisis in 2015 even though over 70% of US drinking water systems are fluoridated.

( My thoughts are if fluoride works so well, and Sen Bernie Sanders said there was a dental crisis in 2015 with about 70% of the USA water fluoridated...... then clearly medicating your water with unregulated doses of servings/fluoride every day is not working, right?? )

What is really going on here, since fluoride in water does not work? And there is tons of proof it is poisoning the population.

Look up Agenda 21 / 2030. That's what.

Everyone knows a dirty glass of water, in a 3rd world country you can see is dirty, is a sexy humanitarian thing to support getting rid of.

Fighting to get toxins out of "clear" looking water anywhere else, is a political nightmare and a conspiracy according to a lot of people.

Key word there -- CON.

Negative Impact on Human Cognitive Functioning Linked to Fluoride : http://www.fluoridealert.org/studies/brain03/

45 Animal Studies Conclusions on Fluoride Impact on Cognitive Functioning : http://www.fluoridealert.org/studies/brain02/

Harvard Report : http://www.fluoridealert.org/articles/hsph_2012/

NRC / National Research Council Report : http://www.fluoridealert.org/researchers/nrc/findings/

EPA / Environmental Protection Agency Reports : http://www.fluoridealert.org/uploads/epa_mundy.pdf

Related Links / Medical Studies etc: (In Order)

http://fluoridealert.org/news/has-fluoridation-damaged-childrens-teeth/

http://www.fluoridealert.org/studies/brain01/

http://www.fluoridealert.org/studies/brain04_/

http://fluoridealert.org/studytracker/25472/

http://fluoridealert.org/studytracker/14694/

More Recent Related Info:

The Fluoride Deception ( 13 Mins/ Mini-Documentary) via: The Health Ranger / Mike Adams (who hates Bitcoin/Crypto by the way)

The Fluoride Deception is the latest mini documentary from Mike Adams, executive director of the Consumer Wellness Center. Through the use of animation and motion graphics, it exposes the truth about where fluoride really comes from: The toxic byproducts of the phosphate mining industry.

---

Mercola.com

Story :

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/10/11/dr-bill-osmunson-on-fluoride.aspx

--

Story at-a-glance:

--

Fluoride is a toxic industrial waste product, which may also be contaminated with lead, arsenic, radionucleotides, aluminum and other industrial contaminants.

The fluoride added to municipal water supplies is not pharmaceutical grade.

Twenty-three studies from four countries indicate that even moderate exposure to fluoride lowers IQ.

The daily dose of fluoride recommended by the American Dental Association results in the same level of fluoride in your blood shown to cause an 8-point drop in IQ.

Poison control should be called if you swallow a quarter milligram of fluoride from toothpaste. Meanwhile just ONE glass of water can contain this amount of fluoride.

To remain within "safe" limits, you'd have to use such a small amount of fluoridated toothpaste that one tube would last you several years.

---

IAOMT Resources:

[ The International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology (IAOMT) ]
They provide several resources / links, here are a couple.

https://iaomt.org/resources/fluoride-facts/fluoride-exposure-human-health-risks/

https://3wsw4k3ihv8vobohr3qsiut5-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/Selected-Quotes-about-Fluoride-Warnings-from-the-IAOMT.pdf

https://iaomt.org/resources/fluoride-facts/fluoride-pollution-environment/

---

---

Neurotoxical Damage -- Brain Damage....

---

The Federal EPA in the United States (Environmental Protection Agency) is actually being sued over this by the Fluoride Action Network: I have updated the template of this series with the info on this above.

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

Letter addressed to a resident enquiry on fluoridation. Austrian Head of Water Department states fluoride is "toxic" in his brief reply on the record:

“Toxic fluorides have never been added to the public water supplies in Austria.”
SOURCE: M. Eisenhut, Head of Water Department, Osterreichische Yereinigung fur das Gas-und Wasserfach Schubertring 14, A-1015 Wien, Austria, February 17, 2000.

http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/austria.pdf

---

European Governments/ Official Statements Opposing TOXIC Water Fluoridation:

--

http://fluoridealert.org/content/europe-statements/

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

Past Episodes (in Part:)

https://steemit.com/health/@barrydutton/fluoride-and-other-toxins-in-your-municipal-water-supplies-are-poisoning-you-they-re-full-of-cancerous-neurotoxins-and-crap-here

https://steemit.com/health/@barrydutton/342jsw-fluoride-and-other-toxins-in-your-municipal-water-supplies-are-poisoning-you-they-re-full-of-cancerous-neurotoxins-and-crap-here

https://steemit.com/health/@barrydutton/2j6mqc-fluoride-and-other-toxins-in-your-municipal-water-supplies-are-poisoning-you-they-re-full-of-cancerous-neurotoxins-and-crap-here

https://steemit.com/health/@barrydutton/e-14-or-fluoride-and-other-toxins-in-your-municipal-water-supplies-are-poisoning-you-they-re-full-of-cancerous-neurotoxins-and

https://steemit.com/health/@barrydutton/e-15-or-fluoride-and-other-toxins-in-your-municipal-water-supplies-are-poisoning-you-they-re-full-of-cancerous-neurotoxins-and

https://steemit.com/health/@barrydutton/e-16-or-fluoride-and-other-toxins-in-your-municipal-water-supplies-are-poisoning-you-they-re-full-of-cancerous-neurotoxins-and

https://steemit.com/health/@barrydutton/e-17-or-fluoride-and-other-toxins-in-your-municipal-water-supplies-are-poisoning-you-they-re-full-of-cancerous-neurotoxins-and

https://steemit.com/health/@barrydutton/e-19-or-fluoride-and-other-toxins-in-your-municipal-water-supplies-are-poisoning-you-they-re-full-of-cancerous-neurotoxins-and

https://steemit.com/health/@barrydutton/e-20-or-fluoride-and-other-toxins-in-your-municipal-water-supplies-are-poisoning-you-they-re-full-of-cancerous-neurotoxins-and

---

Thanks for reading, have a nice day.

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

If you liked this blog post - please Resteem it and share good content with others!

--

Some of my recent blogs:

--

https://steemit.com/steemit/@barrydutton/steemit-needs-series-45-or-a-fun-post-or-pls-comment-with-your-ideas-to-improve-steemit-or-3-21-2018-or-community-engagement-or

https://steemit.com/politics/@barrydutton/activist-post-long-time-regional-councillor-at-our-city-hall-made-this-up-for-me-awhile-back-due-to-my-activism-lol

https://steemit.com/health/@barrydutton/e-28-or-a-key-to-success-no-matter-what-be-the-best-version-of-you-or-1-day-at-a-time-some-thoughts-from-a-guy-that-actually

https://steemit.com/news/@barrydutton/5jpxbc-deep-state-intel-usa-libertarian-party-head-sarah-palin-others-named-in-wikileaks-list-of-secret-us-intelligence-assets

---

If you feel my posts are undervalued or you want to donate to tip me - I would appreciate it very much.

--

LiteCoin (LTC) - LKdsnvSXk9JW99EiNicFMGKc1FXiBo9tUE

Ethereum (ETH) - 0x3Ad69Ff057C9533ca667B2d7E3E557F5eeFd4477

Ethereum Classic (ETC) - 0x5ab2b08d4ce8d454eb9d1ecc65c6d8b0c5f9784c

EOS (EOS) - 0xD37bEFf5bf07E3aa432de00cE0AaA8df603A4fB0

Bitcoin (BTC) - 18J6RRuzX4V7b2CDbx7tWZYNBLkkGWsvWX

DASH - XgZvsvSZgPkNbmGbRhc3S1Pt2JAc7QHwiS

PIVX - DA3azxQqJiX9t7EviuacpamfNhMi2zGAUh

Stratis (STRAT) - SNsJp6v1jXvKWy4XcXSXfNQ9zhSJJppJgv

ZCash (ZEC) - t1aCPEYELkGaf3GtgGTiCEDo7XfPm4QEwmL

---

---

Please note -- I will have limited internet access for awhile -- so PLEASE do not be upset that I cannot reply right away, or to everyone. I am dealing with some changes, and will have limited time online and will be happy if I get a few blog posts up a week.

This has really upset some people but I do not force my opinions on others, or need to communicate every detail of my life or issues, most people do not care anyways. I invested around 10 hours or more a day on Steemit most of my first 13 mths here, trying to build community, put out content and engage people, help and donate to people, and I just do not have that time in my life right now, and that includes for replies and voting/curation.

I have done my best, sorry if you do not understand like some are clearly having a problem with. It's a blogging platform, and I will do my best at everything, and to keep blogging.

Carry On.