Hong kong 'umbrella movement' protesters found guilty over pro-democracy rallies
Professors chan relatives-guy and benny tai and baptist minister chu yiu-ming amongst 9 discovered guilty of public nuisance fees.
Benny Tai, centre, is flanked by Baptist minister Chu Yiu-ming, 74, (2nd L) and sociology professor Chan Kin-man, 59 (2nd R) as they enter West Kowloon magistrates court in Hong Kong in November last year. Photograph: Anthony Wallace/AFP/Getty Images.
9 hong kong democracy campaigners have been discovered guilty over their involvement in pro-democracy rallies in 2014, in a arguable verdict prompting renewed alarm about the metropolis’s political freedom. Protest leaders which includes sociology professor chan family-man, 60, regulation professor benny tai, fifty four, and baptist minister chu yiu-ming, seventy five, had been among those convicted of rarely used colonial-generation public nuisance fees for their roles inside the 2014 umbrella motion protests calling at no cost elections, the most important civil disobedience motion inside the metropolis’s records. All 3 have been charged with one rely of conspiracy to motive public nuisance. Tai and chan were additionally convicted of inciting others to motive public nuisance. The courtroom did no longer at once announce sentences for the costs, which each carry a most of 7 years in jail. The opposite defendants, including seasoned-democracy lawmakers, tanya chan and shiu ka-chun, former student leaders eason chung and tommy cheung, and raphael wong, an activist, had been convicted of inciting others to purpose a public nuisance as well as inciting others to incite. One former lawmaker, lee wing-tat, turned into convicted of incitement to incite others create public nuisance. In a precis of the judgement, justice johnny chan said civil disobedience changed into not a defence to a criminal rate. “the offence of conspiracy to reason a public nuisance does not have the undesirable impact of curbing or suppressing civil disobedience at its formation degree or suppressing human rights because the defendants contended,” the court concluded.
On tuesday, supporters retaining yellow umbrellas, a symbol of the demonstrations, crowded out of doors the courthouse. Tai advised supporters: “no matter what occurs nowadays, i've the confidence that many humans right here will try for hong kong’s democracy.”
the trio based the pro-democracy “occupy vital” movement in 2013 which joined the student-led umbrella motion a year later that delivered components of the metropolis to a standstill for months.
Hong kong’s justice branch ultimately brought the costs against the organization leaders, greater than two years after the protest ended. The nine defendants, referred to as the “umbrella nine” were the closing group of demonstrators to be charged over the 2014 protests. Human rights organizations have described the prosecution as politically stimulated, criticising the usage of vaguely worded public nuisance laws towards protesters.
“hong kong courts, by means of labelling peaceful protests in pursuit of rights as public nuisance, are sending a terrible message with a purpose to probably embolden the government to prosecute greater peaceful activists, further chilling loose expression in hong kong,” said maya wang, senior china researcher at human rights watch. Guy-kei tam, amnesty’s hong kong director, stated: “nowadays’s responsible verdicts are a crushing blow for freedom of expression and non violent protest in hong kong. The authorities has used indistinct costs in their relentless persecution of the umbrella 9.”
“the government is increasingly more using prosecutions as a political device to target non violent activists, abusing the law to silence debate approximately touchy problems inclusive of hong kong democracy and autonomy,” tam stated. The metropolis enjoys rights unseen at the chinese mainland, which can be blanketed with the aid of the 50-year handover settlement among britain and china, but fears are growing that those liberties are being eroded. On the trial, prosecutors argued the mass protests had prompted a “commonplace damage executed to the general public”, who have been tormented by the blockage of important roads. On saturday, greater than two hundred supporters, such as outspoken cardinal joseph zen, collected for a carrier ahead of the decision in which the gang prayed and sang songs. The venue – kowloon union church – become in which the trio first announced their “occupy relevant” manifesto six years ago.
“what we are going through is the maximum effective autocracy in human records and we ought to take returned our democratic rights from its hand,” a tearful tai instructed his supporters, referring to china’s more and more assertive manage over the town. The occupy motion highlighted tremendous frustration, especially some of the young, over hong kong’s route however didn't win any reforms or concessions from beijing. On account that then, many activists have been prosecuted, with some jailed, whilst a string of seasoned-democracy lawmakers were barred.