Education is the cause of liberty and freedom and not the other way around.
It is rare for me to find a book that is so focused, so on point and where the ink lives liberty and freedom to the point where it permeates the reader to the very soul. Such a book creates a situation that is hard to describe. Just like there are people in this world who's talents are so all consuming to the viewer, that in truth the consumer will claim owner ship of the experience, in such a way as to become the billboard for the artist.
So too does this book live and breath liberty and freedom to such an extent, that I could not keep such to myself and must as a matter of who I am, share it with my fellow steemians.Rarer still is a books whose APPENDIX is at least as good as the body of the text shared by the author ; The Reformation Of Union State Sovereignty The Path Back to the Political System Our Founding Fathers Intended– A Sovereign Life, Liberty, And a Free Market By M. Kenneth Creamer is such a book. In truth one cannot excuse keeping such a treasure to themselves. It is like air, water and land in that these things are very plentiful and the cost is merely the price of breathing. Kind of like Liberty and Freedoms cost being self education. It is my hope that those who read the following excerpt from this international treasure will in fact know that the sources are impeccable. One could not find a better authority than the first Chief Justice Jay, Chisholm, if such where needed. So if you have doubt, herein ly's the truth.
185 NOTES 186 NOTES187 APPENDIX
A Declarations of Individual Sovereignty
Few people understand the concept of individual sovereignty as it pertains to citizenship and fewer still understand that it is the basic building block of Power within our own Constitutional Republic. Below is an early Supreme Court opinion written by Justice John Jay, the first Chief Justice to be appointed to the Supreme Court. I have been told by an attorney that the idea or concept of individual sovereignty was a “big & lie” and that sovereignty devolved to the people as one body for the whole. While such a notion violates the existence theorem and has no precedent to protect it from being categorized as belonging to the class of fictions, I have footnoted the following passage to help the readers decide on their own whether Chief Justice Jay is referring to the individuals collectively as a whole or whether he is referring to the whole body as separate individuals.
“The revolution, or rather the Declaration of Independence, found the people already united for general purposes, and at the same time, providing for more domestic concerns, by states conventions, and other temporary arrangements. From the crown of Great Britain, the sovereignty of their country passed to the people of it: and it was then not an uncommon opinion that the un-appropriated lands, which belonged to the crown, passed, not to the people of the colony or states within those limits they were situated, but to the whole people... 'We the people of the United States do ordain and establish this constitution.' Here we see the people acting as the sovereigns84 of the whole country: and in the language of sovereignty, establishing a constitution by which it was their85 will that the state governments should be bound, and to which constitutions should be made to conform... It will be sufficient to observe briefly, that the sovereign ties of Europe, and particularly in England, existed on feudal principles. That system considers the prince as the sovereign, and the people his subjects; it regards his person as the object of allegiance, and excludes the idea of his being on an equal footing with a subject, either in a court of justice or elsewhere. That system contemplates him as being the fountain of honor and authority; and from his grace and grant, derives all franchises, immunities, and privileges; it is easy to perceive, that such a sovereign could not be amenable to a court of justice, or subjected to judicial control and actual constraint... The same feudal ideas run through all their jurisprudence, and constantly remind us of the distinction between the prince and the subject. No such ideas obtain here; at the revolution 86, the sovereignty devolved on the people; and they are truly the 85 Here we see “People acting as sovereigns,” a plurality of individuals. If the sovereignty devolved to the whole people and not to individuals, then Judge Jay would have said “the people acting as the sovereign.”85Again, a plurality of individuals.86 Or rather the Declaration of Independence as aforesaid. 189 sovereigns of the country87, but they are sovereigns without subjects88... and have none to govern but themselves; the citizens of America are equal as fellow-citizens, and as joint tenants in the sovereignty. From the differences existing between feudal sovereign ties and governments founded on compacts, it necessarily follows that their respective prerogatives must differ. In Europe, the sovereignty is generally ascribed to the prince; here it rests with the people; there the sovereign actually administers the government; here never in a single instance; our governors are agents of the people; and at most stand in the same relation to their sovereign, in which the regents of Europe stand to their sovereigns. Their princes have personal powers, dignities and preeminence; our rulers have none but official; nor do they partake in the sovereignty otherwise, or in any other capacity, than as private citizens.89 Chief Justice Jay, Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 (US) Dall 419, 457, 1 LEd 440, 456 at 454. (1793) (emphasis added)
AND 87
The statement that “they are truly the sovereigns of the country,” is, again, unmistakenly obvious that Judge Jay meant “they” to encompass a plurality of individuals as sovereigns or he would have said “they are truly the sovereign of the country. 88 Same analysis as 33 above. 89“Partake of the sovereignty ..... as [individual] private citizens.”
From another equally succinct Supreme Court ruling we find the Individual Sovereignty issue laid out in quite clearly in extremely understandable terms.
“Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject to the law, for it is the author of the law,but in our system, while sovereign powers are delegated to the agencies of government, sovereignty itself remains with the people, by whom and for whom all government exists and acts... For, the very idea that one man may be compelled to hold his life, or the means of living, at the mere will of another, seems intolerable in any country where freedom prevails, as being the essence of slavery itself." Yick Wo v. Hopkins, Sheriff,118 US. 356 (1886) (emphasis added)
Now, is there any question as to who holds the reigns and/or reins of Sovereign Power in this Constitutional Republic made up today of 50 Sovereign Union States created by We the Sovereign People through their related Constitutions? Thereafter, We the Sovereign people together with our territorial agents, the individual Sovereign Union States “in order to form a more perfect Union” created the federal, not National, government, the United States, as an agent to speak for its Creators in matters relative to international diplomacy, treaties, etc., together with local matters such as the value of coinage, duties of each of the 3 estates, Congress,President, and Judicial, etc., as well as other matters needed to keep the agency 191 sovereigns (the Union States and the Federal Government) off the backs of We the Sovereign People.
Source : National Liberty Alliance
In case there is a problem with the first link. Click the link below and find reformation :
https://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/common-law-documents
Of course there is more. Much more. Sadly those who do not prevail upon themselves to get that education, that is so necessary for Liberty and Freedom to manifest, will not be experiencing it without that education. Thus it is up to those of us who have spent that cost to share the cause of Liberty and Freedom regardless of the cost. For if there is one slave in the world we all suffer the consequences.
All photos are from Pixabay.com. Screen shots are mine. I am not responsible for if you think, how you think, what you think or do. You Are!. If you like my content consider a up vote and follow! Peace!
A way to make free BTC and 4.08% interest in a BTC savings account.
Interested in joining or supporting the Information War?
Use tag #informationwar to post your own stories about the lies and propaganda being pushed on the public.
@informationwar will up vote posts worthy of the cause.
Join the discord: https://discord.gg/JsXbzFM chat with like minded individuals like myself and share your articles to receive additional support.
Delegating Steem Power: Another way you can support the cause is to delegate SP to @informationwar.
Delegate 100 SP Note: remember to keep around 50SP in your account so you don't run into any bandwidth problems.
How to delegate SP, join the fan base and more: https://steemit.com/informationwar/@truthforce/you-can-make-a-difference-join-the-informationwar-and-help-support-others-today
Find out more about the Information War. Click Banner!
I saw you from curating a post.
Spot on here as well!
Many people think, though, that education in the broad sense creates independence and freedom. The public school's education is often a form of teaching voluntary servitude. We must do better than that. We must teach our own kids to think for themselves and follow this:
"Thus it is up to those of us who have spent that cost to share the cause of Liberty and Freedom regardless of the cost."
Thanks!!
Peace
Curated for #informationwar (by @wakeupnd)
Our purpose is to encourage posts discussing Information War, Propaganda, Disinformation and other false narratives. We currently have over 7,500 Steem Power and 20+ people following the curation trail to support our mission.
Join our discord and chat with 200+ fellow Informationwar Activists.
Connect with fellow Informationwar writers in our Roll Call! InformationWar - Contributing Writers/Supporters: Roll Call Pt 8
Ways you can help the @informationwar
Very good read! I believe Justice Jay was referring to individual rights.
Resteemed and will be searching for this book!
He was not referring to individual rights, but to individual sovereignty.
Search no more it is the first in a lot of PDF's. Under reformation
The ReformationOfUnion State SovereigntyThe Path Back to the PoliticalSystem Our Founding FathersIntended–A Sovereign Life, Liberty,And a Free MarketByM. Kenneth Creamer
https://www.nationallibertyalliance.org/common-law-documents
Thanks. Thanks for correction.
Will read further.
Awesome post. I will have to read that book. I always find some great stuff at archive.org, it is a treasure trove of information.
Catholic and Christian University Libraries also have so much information it'll make your heads spin.
Great job on this post.
@johnbcheffin12 you are always welcome to use any links or information I share with anyone you want too. Always. Always Your opinion would be desired. I might even be wrong and you could be my friend by telling me what you think. Wrong or Right whatever!