British child mutilation scandal brewing...gender re-assignment staff quitting.
You knew this had to happen soon or later, given all the ramping-up of attention and sympathy for the latest agenda item on the radical LGBTSFWHEDPLVNSFETFKDA's action menu...the "transgender" mutilation of confused and brainwashed little children in greater and greater numbers AT TAXPAYER EXPENSE and with the full support of the state.
(Image courtesy of dutchanarchy.com.)
Eventually, even the mutilators themselves were bound to realize their own evils, and come to their senses (though, to be honest, many are probably too far gone.) Apparently, this has already reached crisis proportions in Great Britain.
Have a look at this article:
Here is an excerpt from the link above:
"Five whistleblowing workers at the only NHS transgender clinic in Britain have quit over fears children as young as three are going through unnecessary gender reassignment treatment. The clinicians from the Gender Identity Development Service (GIDS) clinic based in London and Leeds left over concerns children were being incorrectly diagnosed with gender dysphoria."
(The real "beneficiaries" of child gender-surgery mutilation. Image courtesy of justiceforpoland.com.)
In Britain, of course, there is no real "private healthcare" alternatives. The government IS the "healthcare" provider, so when their chosen promoters of the mutilation agenda quit and go public in significant numbers the potential for serous public blowback to such wide admissions of irreversible injury to children could prove significant, and it will all fall on the government...and rightly so.
You should fully expect that these five will be "damage controlled" immediately and to whatever extreme officials feel is necessary. Expect them to be slienced, have their reputations and backgrounds trashed, and maybe even their flats and homes firebombed. The radicals behind these agendas are--make no mistake--fully committed, fully depraved, and will permit no such public exposure without violent responses.
Another brief excerpt:
"At least 18 staff have reportedly quit the controversial clinic over the past three years, citing fears not enough checks are being done to correctly diagnose child patients. One of the five whistleblowers even said the only reason many stayed in their post was to prevent more children from having the treatment."
While applaud their willingness to act on their change of heart, what bothers me now is knowing their positions will be filled with even more virulently dangerous ideologues of the same persuasion.
MAKE NO MISTAKE...this not about, and never has been about, doing what is best for the children. It is doing what is best to feed the confusion and to instigate the greater acceptance of twisted and desperate adults, many of whom WOULD GO BACK IF THEY COULD but have made their bed and now must lie in it, for life. They don't want to wallow in their misery alone. THAT is what this is really all about, despite what the MSM and the psychobabblers will undoubtedly continue to profess.
Let's hope this minor current awakening to THE PURE EVIL OF MUTILATING susceptible children gets the label of BLATANT CHILD ABUSE that it so richly deserves, and that society will begin to take stern, even harsh, steps to roll back this particular agenda.
To listen to the audio version of this article click on the play image.
Brought to you by @tts. If you find it useful please consider upvoting this reply.
I will concede that there are cases where gender assignment is necessary. Hermaphroditism is an actual thing, and it is better for some resolution for folks that have incomplete or nonfunctional parts, or otherwise medically justified intervention.
However, there is no other case where medical treatment of gender dysphoria is indicated IMHO. Given a functional body, the most I would allow was not horrible child abuse - whether HRT or surgery - is counseling. Frankly, counseling may well be contributing to the problems these children face in a hostile world. My kids wanted tattoos. They could not get them while I was responsible for their health. I told them that this was my decision until they reached the age of majority, and I explained that it was my duty to their future selves - who would be legally capable of making such decisions for themselves at that time.
That's the duty of a parent, and even my son with tattoos made a point once to thank me for not letting him get them as a child for the reasons I gave. He correctly realized that I wasn't preventing him from making his own decisions. I was preventing me from making the decisions while he was a minor, and making sure that irrevocable bodily alteration was entirely at his own sole option.
That was merely tattoos. How much more vitally important are gender issues! It is not respecting children that medical gender treatment is given them as children. It is preventing their making those decisions for themselves when they alone have the responsibility for them. It is taking that power away from them, and that is a crime, and a sex crime of horribly mutilating children legally incapable of consent which should land every doctor and parent that does such things to children in proper prison and on the sex offender registries applicable in their jurisdictions thereafter.
So is circumcision IMHO. If kids wanna snip off parts they can do that to themselves when it's their right to do so at their sole option. Parents, doctors, and religious folks have no right to do that to them absent medical necessity.
I utterly and absolutely disagree on this point however. Government has no agency. It is not a person, not even a legal fiction, and has neither rights nor responsibilities. It is nothing more in legal theory than a mutual agreement of sovereign persons to effect their common and shared goals.
It is the government officials, agents, and personnel that are responsible for crimes committed by government, from the beat cops to the legislators, and they need to be held accountable for those crimes that they commit under the color of law. Government cannot commit a crime. It can be a crime, or be used to commit a crime, but cannot act in any way. The actual persons employed are the actual guilty parties, and no claimed agreement shields them from their liability for tort and criminal acts they personally commit.
Thanks!
Edit: also, thank God for people whose consciences require them to blow the whistle on such barbarity. Make their yokes be easy all their days, and their burdens light.