I'm no Brett Kavanaugh fan, but we are seriously going to talk about teenage groping, but NOT VINCE FOSTER??

I rarely watch The Rockefellers flagship propaganda hour...live from Rockefeller Center.. and commonly known as "CBS Morning News," but I am this morning. I am throwing Styrofoam bricks and bleeding from the eyes as I listen to all the "moral outrage" from the extreme feminist "news" anchors who present this show like it were really news. Apparently, one of their libtard cohorts found a woman who said that Supreme Court nominee, Brett Kavanaugh, came on to her when she was 15, and he a 17-year-old junior at an elite prep school party.

(Image courtesy of dailydot.com)

Kavanaugh supposedly pushed her down onto a bed and ran his hands over her clothing. That's it, the whole allegation. As far I can recall there is noting but a small misdemeanor here, even if it could ever be proven true; which, of course, it can't. They were both teens, so it isn't pedophilia. Somehow, presumably, she got to this bedroom under her own power, so...(you fill in those blanks.) It was unwanted contact, sure, but what would that even have been, criminally, 30 years ago? Not sure there would have even have been a case. Apparently she said "stop" or something similar, and he did....IF ANY OF IT IS TRUE. AND, the Demonrats are banking on THIS to bring down the guy who covered up Hillary's murder of Vince Foster, and allowed them to even have their witch to run for President in the first place??

Talk about delicious irony here.

Kavanaugh is a diehard Bush-buddy and fixer, a treasonous neocon who I would never trust with my Constitutional rights in a "crisis," and someone who should NOT be allowed near the Supreme Court, but certainly not because of this! For those who missed it, here is why the guy really needs to be removed from consideration:

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/08/wapo_calls_facts_of_vince_foster_and_kavanaugh_newsworthy_then_distorts_and_omits_facts.html

Here is a key excerpt for you:

"...there is Rodriguez's resignation letter, dated January 17, 1995, which states that 'the existing FBI interview reports and USPP [United States Park Police] interview reports do not accurately reflect witness statements' and that after 'having refreshed their recollection with new photographic evidence,' 'four emergency medical personnel identified ... trauma each had observed on Foster's right neck area.' An article by Turley at Accuracy in Media cites an article at Turley's website, which includes a link to an audio recording of the late Reed Irvine, founder of AIM, speaking with Kavanaugh about the Foster case. In the conversation, Kavanaugh does a poor job defending the OIC's Foster investigation.
Kavanaugh may have a record of judicial opinions demonstrating fidelity to the rule of law, the relevant facts, and the United States Constitution. But that is only his judicial opinions. Any such record cannot excuse his work on the investigation into the death of Vincent Foster."

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/06/there_is_something_fishy_about_one_of_trumps_potential_supreme_court_nominees_.html

Go there AND READ IT! Don't be lazy. You guys pushing this guy as a "conservative" need to wake up, and force Trump to appoint a true conservative....and I'm talking to FRIENDS...like those at the ACLJ and Gunowners of America who are pushing his nomination!! WAKE UP!

Stop settling!