Don't Acknowledge It
I had a thought and I wanted to see what your response would be to it.
Thought
With regards to recent fake controversies like the "cultural appropriation" dress and things of that nature, I began to wonder about how they never seem to die. If we didn't talk about them, they might not exist. My idea was as follows: if we simply ignore the stupid, it will go away. Spending time and energy discussing these things lends them credibility they don't deserve.
The Catch
Who gets to decide what's worthy of discussion? If I ignore something because it is stupid, what would stop someone from ignoring something I say. Even if I think or can prove its value, they can simply declare my argument moronic and they do not have to engage.
ridicule
easy, fun, and surprisingly valuable
Stupidity does not go away on its own.
Look at modern materialistic science, the entire thing is a fraud and a scam. It should be ignored out of existence by ever real scientist.
But it owns all of the universities. To talk against it is to black ball your career.
So, if the people are just doing it for attention, then ignoring them is the correct answer.
If the people are doing it out of ignorance or stupidity, then it must be challenged with truths.
IDK necessarily what you mean about the sciences, but I get the overall idea and I agree with the general proposition. It is important to discuss when there is a chance to have positive change.
I use the comment a lot, and so was sure everyone knew my stance.
Everything i have learned in college is wrong.
Everything.
Especially science. I will even dispute the scientific method.
Its like the flat earth. Sure, the flat earth sounds kooky, but several pieces of it refute the ball earth, and once you see NASA faking the earth shots, you just can't believe in the ball earth anymore. But, what it really is seems to be in an area which "modern science" has declared off limits.
I fully agree that there are a host of things that are legitimate and valuable, but are "dark arts" and completely deemed off limits to scientists who want anything peer reviewed in the future. The scientific community has the ability to silence any voice is doesn't want heard because of the topic or the end results.
Of course there is a need to always remain skeptical of the state. They have been caught in lies before and they have plenty of reason to lie. In cases like the moon landing, 9/11, and Vegas shooting, there are obvious reasons why they would lie. I don't see a valid motive for lying about the shape of the earth however. What benefit would there be in lying about that to the american people?
Major Byrd said in one interview that down in antarctica there where mountains of coal and other resources. And then, never said anything on the subject again.
If the flat earth people are partially correct, and there is a lot of evidence that should be looked into, then antarctica is HUGE. Encircling the world. People could set out towards an "edge" (not the one where The US seems to be working) and get all kinds of stuff.
Planes aren't allowed to fly over antarctica. But they are allowed to fly over the arctic.
And basically, if we are not on a ball earth then:
Basically, the entire science book.
And the people who have been controlling the academic narrative would lose all of their work.
That is why they would lie about the ball earth.
I don't know too much about the Byrd situation. With regards to planes, there is nothing physically stopping them, but it seems like there are insane regulatory requirements for survival gear and whatnot that makes it unfeasible to fly over. There are also almost no flight paths where going over Antarctica would actually reduce flight time. Flying between Russia and Canada by going over the North Pole makes sense, but Argentina to South Africa via a South Pole Route doesn't make sense.
Again, I think that there is a possibility that the photos and videos of the moon landing and space ops were doctored to make it look like we beat the soviets, but I think think that the evidence of those fraudulent images supports a claim that the earth is a fundamentally different shape. Also, what shapes are the other planets? Are the disks facing us, or are they round?
Don't know about the safety stuff, but i do know that you aren't allowed to fly over antarctica without approval from a treaty signed by all the nations of the earth. That, in itself is truly mind boggling.
There are two stated "real" pictures of the earth. The rest of them are denoted as being pieced together, or photoshopped. Just look at the changes in land mass sizes in these.
It is very likely that we live on the inside of whatever shape the thing is that we call earth.
Have you noticed that everything except mars (which seems to be a moon) looks like a swirl of clouds? Maybe that is what earth looks like on the outside.
But really, this is a rabbit hole you need to look at on your own. It is very deep. And expect a lot of dis-information sites and a LOT of kooks who don't seem to know even basic science.
NASA was set up by the grand occultist (occult meaning to hide) himself, and so the propensity for NASA to hide information was baked into the cake from the start.
Ignoring stupid can be dangerous. If its a stupid movement there is a group of people who are smart behind it, controlling stupid masses for an agenda. Point out why its stupid, maybe add a few memes, provide correct information and then move on. Avoid pointless arguments with their troll bots.
That's actually a really astute observation. The best way forwards is to ignore the grunts and take the fight right to the top where it makes a difference. The masses are so full of rhetoric and so empty when it comes to actual thought that it won't really get anywhere.
Really astute stuff man, take a follow.
Thanks
Curated for #informationwar (by @openparadigm)
Relevance: Discussion
Our Purpose