Sort:  

I am finding it hard to judge what Chump is doing.
All the presidents since Reagan have all been doing the same thing, as in, almost identical, so it was easy to interpret their words and see through their lies.

Chump is having a great impact on things. He is shaking things up just by his mere presence. But, what is he actually doing? Well, its not more of the same. But is it as bad as Bush-Clinton regime? Is there going to be any good directly done? On this, i have no clue.

"All the presidents since Reagan have all been doing the same thing, as in, almost identical, so it was easy to interpret their words and see through their lies."

You and I agree completely on this, but partisans of Demoblican or Republicrat factions don't at all. Followers of Clinton denied the horror of Kosovo, and those of Reagan Nicaragua. We who followed neither saw both, and that the identical forces conducted identical destruction for identical purposes.

Mossad, Psygroup, The Black Cube aren't staffed by fools, and the shake up you note is the recruiting of our in-group by those psyops, rather than an ending of the predatory forces imposing despotism globally today, as always.

Trump disparaged Libya, and the Syrian war in his rhetoric. He decried unnecessary secrecy and abhorred the surveillance he himself was subjected to during his candidacy, and the rhetoric deeply resonated with you and I, and all those opposed to those oppressions we saw both the established wings of power exerting.

But, he hasn't ended the surveillance. Instead, he's extending it. He hasn't ended the torture. Instead he chose 'Bloody' Gina Haspel to lead the torturers. He hasn't ended the secrecy, instead extending the time for the Kennedy files to be kept secret. He hasn't ended the Syrian conflict, clearly aiding and abetting al Qaeda in their depredations.

Now we who have been excluded heretofore in the voter base that supported the Demoblicans and Republicrats have cleverly been chosen to be included, because those groups have become so obviously corrupt that the outgroup - us - became larger than the ingroup.

I'm not putting on blinders to keep me from seeing the continuation of the same game even if the groups are shaken up a bit. Wolves still prey on the sheep, and it doesn't matter to the sheep if the wolves reorganize their ranks a bit.

Very true, I upvoted your post!

Great post @valued-customer .. from memory I think Al-Qaeda stands for the database .. a database of mercenaries, operatives and deluded individuals that could be utilised by the CIA. Indeed it's funny how under the guise of the military’s outreach program, Anwar Al-Awlaki (the first American on the CIA's kill or capture list) dined at the Pentagon in the aftermath of 911.

I think you're correct about the meaning of al Qaeda, 'the base'. I remember reading that Osama bin Laden's mother and George W. Bush's mother watched 9/11 happen live together in the same room.

That close personal association indicates strongly that the propaganda we have been - and continue to be - fed has little relation to reality.

Thanks!

I remember reading that Osama bin Laden's mother and George W. Bush's mother watched 9/11 happen live together in the same room.

Yes I think I heard that as well .. I also remember reading that in the days following 911, one of the first flights contained members of the Bin Laden family (whom like you say are friends of the Bush's) but I'll have to double check that. Whether or not people believe he is aware, I think they are deliberately and insidiously attaching elements of the "truth movement" to Trump (and the faux Russian narrative) to create a subconscious impression in the minds of the majority .. I very much believe they fully intend the truth to become perceived as both hate and espionage, at which point (with many cheering it on) they will come for those that speak it. Perhaps they will use some kind of "false flag" or capitalise upon an "event" to legally shut down this form of discourse and enshrine it into law as hate speech/espionage. Whilst everyone is looking to the right, totalitarianism will come in from the left .. a left/right blow to the decaying vestiges of a free society.

Even while all other air traffic was grounded, the Bin Ladens were evacuated from the US by air.

The slight of hand you note is indeed ongoing. But the technology that is newly transcending the grasp and reach of oppressors is making us too powerful to crush in that iron grip - if we but adopt it and employ it.

From the chains of debt and market manipulation, to the ranks of armed thugs bought and paid for by those imbued with the wealth artificially created thereby, technology is making their tools obsolete, along with their power.

When we adopt that technology we also adopt the power that rightly belongs to us, and will be the birthright of our beloved posterity.

I'm thinking Trump is keeping back documents on HRC and a few other American scandals for the sake of politics. I assume he will get information out only when he needs popularity points.
Watch for "leaks" in October and expect a deluge when he is up for re-election. It's frustrating to see him doing this but I have my fingers crossed I'm right and we get the truth sooner than later.

I've no doubt you are right that Trump is planning releases for propaganda purposes, but neither do I doubt that he isn't planning releases to take down the very deep state that brought him to power.

The Kennedy assassination documents that should have become public by now, that were instead continued to be sealed by Trump's personal order, illustrate exactly what I expect to remain the status quo.

Just because there is an internal power struggle between would be Alphas in the pack doesn't make the prey safer. It doesn't really matter which wolf is in charge - to the herd the pack feeds on.

It matters a great deal to the wolves, and they'll fight to the death for that power. Then, once the contest is settled, they'll work together to feed the pack.

I hope it happens. I'm with you, the waiting sucks and we should have the truth yesterday. We will see I suppose, this is the kind of tuff that makes me nervous, backroom deals an BS

"Good" and "evil," who or what determines such? The modern humanist West jettisoned the Christian moral center of their sociocultural heritage; from whence, then, come the judgment regarding good or evil in anything?

From what I can gather, the only relevant value assessment of the libertarian minded modern humanists are "freedom," "voluntarism," or some such nonsense. If these be the metric, upon which outcome is judged, then the descent of Libya and Syria into anarchy ought to be a "good," since the humans in these regions have been freed from the tyranny of their overlords to exercise their freedom of "voluntary association." That the Western political institutions "encourage" such freedom around the world should be celebrated and HRC a hero for the cause of world freedom.

"...these regions have been freed from the tyranny of their overlords to exercise their freedom of "voluntary association.""

They have just suffered a changing of the guard. It isn't anarchy we see in Syria or Libya today, but the imposition of an oppressive government of terrorists that happen to be paid mercenaries of the West.

When communities have possession of the technologies I linked in this post, which they certainly do not in Syria and Libya, then foreign invaders will have no more ability to impose their draconian will on them than domestic oppressors.

That will be anarchy, and if you're lucky, you'll get to see it in your lifetime. I hope I do. I'd like to know my grandchildren will be free of the scourges that have scarred my people heretofore, to see it with my own eyes before I die.

Conflating Terrorism (coined to refer to the revolutionary French government that ruled by guillotine) with anarchy is unreasonable. Have a look at reports from people on the ground in Syria today, and you will not find claims that the Syrian people in occupied regions are running the show.

You'll hear that Islamist mercenaries are, and that isn't anarchy, it's despotism.

Have a look at reports from people on the ground in Syria today, and you will not find claims that the Syrian people in occupied regions are running the show.

How will the perfect libertarian paradise of voluntarism address organized bands of would be despots that we witness in the Libertarian Republic of Syria? When central authority abates from outer provinces, thugs rise to fame, not voluntarism or freedom. Human misery does not originate with institutions or social hierarchy, but within humans themselves. That most humans are incapable of governing themselves is historical and sociological fact. When men organize for violence, whether it be as pirates or as defenders, institutions and hierarchy must be established. What is such but government, and who would command the instrument of institution, but the crown?

Absolute good or perfect freedom does not exist within this realm of existence. All humans, or rather rational humans, can do is to tolerate inconveniences and accept the cost of trade-offs in organizing a stable and secure society. Regardless of the brutality of Bashar al Assad, his regime maintained stability, prosperity, and acceptable levels of privileges. When anarchy rears its head, these accoutrements of civilization must be renegotiated with various interests and powers. Syria is an inevitable consequence of anarchy, resulting from the muck drunk on too much Western humanism, deluding themselves into believing in the fantasy of a "free" society. Such place does not and will not exist in the reality of this realm. Poisoning the minds of susceptible youths with the toxin of humanist drivel will only get them crushed beneath the jackboot of our masters' or would be masters' enforcers.

What Assad and the SAA are fighting is not anarchism. It's an invasion by foreign supported mercenaries. What would voluntary societies do to defend themselves? They would be a militia as the militia was meant to be. It was meant to be the whole body of people trained to arms. There are bad people, so we need a government made up of people? No thanks. There's no good reason to create a ruling class.

And who would command your militia? How would it be supplied, organized, and directed? Do you think a committee of merchants, farmers, technicians, and slaves can conduct war against trained killers serving a king, supported by a central bureaucracy? And who would serve in your glorious militia, when in the "free" societies of the West, subjects refuse even to vote. Will your libertarian "volunteers" even follow simple commands from their commander, when they are too drunk on "freedom" to even organize a government or recognize their betters? A collection of part-time, undisciplined mob does not make an army.

Totalitarian societies rise because humans will infinitely prefer living on their knees rather than dying amidst chaos and anarchy. The so-called members of the "free" Syrian army likely longing for the blissful security of Assad's authoritarian fist to their current pathetic existence.

LOL

Ask the Brits. It worked pretty well against them. You fail to understand that the "resistance" in Syria is an outside mercenary proxy army. In other words, your entire scenario isn't true.

Ha! You Yanks always extoll disproportionate amount of credit to your mythical colonial fortitude, when regarding your rebellion. I suppose acknowledging that your country was convinced to secede from His Majesty's government by gullible rice farmers, either bribed or conned by the smuggler mafia, would not engender the blind 'Murican patriotism. Do you Yanks actually believe that the colonial revolt would have succeeded without the military, financial, and logistical assistance from the Bourbon France and Bourbon Spain?

The militia scum in the vaunted "Continental Army" scattered to the winds, upon their first contact with His Majesty's expeditionary force, despite Colonel Washington's attempt at keeping these dogs in some semblance of military formation, using his horse whip. Your colonial revolt was fought by "outside mercenary proxies" of the Bourbon dynasty against the legitimate military force of the Hanover dynasty. The situation in Syria is exactly the same as your much celebrated American "Revolution."

Loading...

Curated for #informationwar (by @commonlaw)

  • Our purpose is to encourage posts discussing Information War, Propaganda, Disinformation and other false narratives. We currently have over 8,000 Steem Power and 20+ people following the curation trail to support our mission.

  • Join our discord and chat with 200+ fellow Informationwar Activists.

  • Join our brand new reddit! and start sharing your Steemit posts directly to The_IW!

  • Connect with fellow Informationwar writers in our Roll Call! InformationWar - Contributing Writers/Supporters: Roll Call Pt 11

Ways you can help the @informationwar

  • Upvote this comment.
  • Delegate Steem Power. 25 SP 50 SP 100 SP
  • Join the curation trail here.
  • Tutorials on all ways to support us and useful resources here

Do you know how many politicians sit in the same masonic lodge and appear entirely opposed in the public? I don't. But some of the names look surprising. Like Merkel and Putin in the same lodge, then Bush-Al-Bhagdadi-Blair-Sarkozy in the same lodge, etc. And if you read also Zerozerozero by Roberto Saviani then you start recognizing the signatures of various mafias in the terrorist attacks (for instance, they didn't dare to publicize the police report from the Paris attack but it did have the signature of the cruelest mafia on the planet; part of those atrocities were found on the blog of some Danish psychologist ) + the application of the sentence from the Elders of Zion text that nothing will happen to their people, bot those who are not genuine members (by bloodline I guess) will not be spared. It's interesting what Michael Franzese said in his interview: that the black -op money is used to kill the Christians around the planet (looks like they performing the dictionary meaning of Rapture).

I am not privy to details of their meetings, nor of the particulars of their interpersonal relationships, but I would be surprised indeed if most of the public debate and rhetoric wasn't mostly for show.

Thanks!

Congratulations @valued-customer! You have completed the following achievement on the Steem blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

Award for the number of comments

Click on the badge to view your Board of Honor.
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

To support your work, I also upvoted your post!

Support SteemitBoard's project! Vote for its witness and get one more award!

Congratulations @valued-customer! You have completed the following achievement on the Steem blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

Award for the number of upvotes received

Click on the badge to view your Board of Honor.
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

Support SteemitBoard's project! Vote for its witness and get one more award!

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.29
TRX 0.11
JST 0.033
BTC 63945.57
ETH 3135.76
USDT 1.00
SBD 4.00