Do you know Sarah Jeong? You don't really have to. She is not an important person and his post isn't even about her. on August 1st New York Times Announced that she joined their editorial board. This is what she is going to do with NYT:

What would it be like if we all deleted Facebook? What does the future of online privacy look like?Why can’t the tech industry diversify? Are monkeys allowed to sue over copyrights? And what in the world is #cockygate?
To answer questions like these, the editorial board will soon be turning to Sarah Jeong, who will join us in September as our lead writer on technology. Sarah will also collaborate with Susan Fowler Rigetti, our incoming tech op-ed editor, and Kara Swisher, our latest contributor on tech issues.

Born in South Korea, Sarah grew up in North Carolina and California. She’s both a journalist and a lawyer. As a student at Harvard Law School, she edited the Journal of Law & Gender and worked at the Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society. She was a Poynter Fellow in Journalism at Yale for 2016 and was named to Forbes 30 under 30 for Media in 2017. She’s written for The Atlantic, Vice’s Motherboard, The Washington Post, and The New York Times Magazine.
Source: https://www.nytco.com/sarah-jeong-joins-the-timess-editorial-board

Sarah Jeong - The Journalist

There is not much value to be found talking about people. great minds talk about ideas and only idiots should evolve their discussions around people. So what does this new and rising star who got into one of the biggest new companies has to say? What does she represent?

That's Not The Whole Story

There is more where it came from. I just don't want too many toxic garbage to read through. i think this amount o material is sufficient to illustrate a decent enough picture.

I'm not going to be one sided. I'm going to state that she calls these things satire and imitating those who harass her online. There is a point where things do become tasteless. But I am a supporter of humor that really push boundaries to help people expand their minds.

But saying that something was just a joke ca be a great excuse o cover up a person's real intentions. Even if these tweets are not what she is thinking, there is enough evidence (if you are willing to dig more info on the person) to be convinced that many of these are at least an exaggeration of her own views.

Don't Be Mad; Be Happy

It's easy to notice the hypocrisy and it is easy to get mad. but some things are not just worth wasting your time on.

While many found negativity I was rejoiced. That is because where I immediately looked. I didn't come to steemit to make a rant. I didn't read/ watch content that was for or against her. i didn't waste my time thinking about how distorted the society has become. I simply went to the root. I opened Wikipedia (which is also slowly dying out)

The Net Profit Of The New York Times Company For 2017 Was 0.002563% Of The Revenue

I had a small laugh instead of anger. I don't know what kind of acounting gimmicks they go through. But these numbers are sickly terrible. The prominent feature of evil is that it only destroyed. NYT has gotten evil into their beds and it's slowly ruining them. It's all just Atlas Shrugged for them. Problem solved. NYT hiring more SJWs is a great and wonderful thing. It's like a soft communism turning full blown commie. So do't hate. Don'be mad. Don't even discuss. Just try some math. Look behind the curtains. Wisdom makes you happier.

The reality is Better Than Your Nightmares. You Just Need to Have Some Math To Figure That Out