Scottish Cheese Makers Fight To Change The Rules

in #market5 years ago (edited)


Farmers in Scotland want to be able to make and sell raw milk cheese but the government and its current edicts surrounding that activity want to prevent them from doing so. The new guidance that they are fighting is one that critics argue is seeking to legislate raw milk cheese production out of existence in the country. At present, sales of raw milk and cream etc are completely banned in Scotland and have been for many years, but you can find some raw cheese products.

Farmers in Canada, the United States, and elsewhere, have all had to endure the same battle, if they've been interested in producing raw milk products. Even if you want to drink milk that is coming from your own cow, lawmakers still want to get in the way and tell you how to live your life.

Now, the operators of at least 5 different Scottish companies are fighting back in court to see if they can change things.

And they've recently been able to raise the legal funds in order to do it. They want to formally challenge the current legislation surrounding the making of cheese from any raw, unpasteurized milk. They are tackling the new guidance that has been issued, and they were successful in raising the funds after seeking to raise the money through crowdfunding. They've already raised thousands of dollars from hundreds of people who have been willing to help.

The 5 companies are Errington Cheese, Finlay's Farm, Farmhouse Cheese, Cambus O May, Galloway Farmhouse, and Isle of Mull Cheese.

These companies will be seeking to challenge the current lawfulness of the government guidance on producing cheese from any unpasteurized or raw milk, and that guidance comes from the Scottish Food Enforcement Liaison Committee (SFELC), the guidance is used for inspections and enforcement of the rules.

There has reportedly been a growing lack of trust with the decision making authorities over the matter and that's what has finally persuaded these various companies to collectively take action now.

Cheese producers from the region have suggested a number of changes to be made to the guidance and those in charge of enforcement etc have reportedly agreed that some of those changes might soon be possible.

Not everyone is convinced of what they're being told though. A representative from one cheese producer, Errington Cheese, has already taken to their website to assert that they have zero confidence that the governing bodies have accepted or learned anything new over the past several years, while claiming to be seeking input from the industry regarding raw milk cheese. They fear that the government might still be committed to eradicating the industry.

Those behind the new legal fight against the recently released guidance are arguing that the rules don't reflect current EU industry guidance surrounding the production of raw milk cheese. They fear that the rules are going to make raw milk cheese production unviable in the region. They've been allegedly attempting to work with the government to have those rules changed so that they align with EU rules on cheese-making and enforcement, but say they can't wait any longer for the governing bodies to make the required changes.

Despite the many warnings that have been issued about the dangers of drinking raw milk or consuming raw milk products etc, many people are still eager to incorporate these goods into their diet. The demand is so strong that those in Scotland for example, who want raw milk have been left having to order it from hundreds of miles away. To try and keep up with the demand, a number of farms in the UK and elsewhere have even installed their own raw milk vending machines so that people can walk up and get what they need, when they need it.

Pics:
pixabay
pixabay
pixabay
pic 3

Related Posts:

Raw Milk Sales Are Up Despite Fears Over Health Risks

Raw Milk Legalization Pending In Montana

Purchasing Raw Milk Products From A Vending Machine

Sort:  

@doitvoluntarily hello dear friend. if the products meet a food security, I think it's wrong that the possibility of selling these products is not granted, there is a market willing to market and customers to buy them, a product that can generate more income
I wish you a wonderful weekend

It is an overreach for government to impose particular mechanisms to ensure the safety of products, rather than safety standards - and that's even if you accept that there is a justification for government itself for such purposes as imposing safety standards.

Personally, I am far more in favor of a different mechanism(s), that defund to the greatest degree possible monopolist institutions that create vectors for corruption and this kind of totalitarian imposition of commerce allowed to sovereign people. An example would be privately owned testing laboratories that consumers could contract to test products for them on an as needed basis. In the event that some product or other harmed a consumer, a tort action at law would seek damages compensatory and punitive from an outfit that purveyed harmful products. There would be several benefits from this scheme, not the least of which would be the end of such vectors for corruption and collusion with industry by regulatory agencies that could render them immune to tort actions even were malfeasance provable (as the vaccine industry is, for example), or be able to set standards that imposed anti-competitive burdens on competitors, or that enabled intolerable harm to be caused by products that didn't meet a regulatory bar for malignance, or negligence.

All these things are done by regulatory agencies today, all too often. This is why sperm and testosterone levels have declined by 60% or more in the last 50 years, and no one is even informed about it, much less burning castles, lynching perpetrators, or shuttering pollution sources.

Other benefits would include far lower expenses for consumer protection, not least through lower tax compliance costs to taxpayers, greater public scrutiny of commercial products, individuals able to determine at will and relatively low cost and facility whether a product met standards they themselves find acceptable, and that compensation would be delivered to those harmed when found justified in court, rather than to government agencies. Many more benefits to such a private system of regulatory surveillance and enforcement pertain as well.

Government is not necessary for most of the things it is tasked to do presently, and mission creep has long perverted government so badly that government itself is practically the worst vector for harm by every metric measurable, that it was originally intended by it's adopters to prevent.

Thanks!

Power to the people bro! Keep shedding that light. My Friends in Vilcabamba Ecuador who had a family of four living on 120 dollars a month, would get warm milk straight from their neighbors cow for like 25 cents a gallon, and feed it to their unvaccinated children. These kids were some of the smartest, healthiest, and happiest kids I've ever seen. Well behaved too, no weird mood swings or temper tantrums either.

Wishing you the very best from Bali Indonesia! -Dan

I'm rooting for the farmers in Scotland. Freedom needs to prevail and raw milk cheese actually sounds good. Thanks for sharing.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.31
TRX 0.11
JST 0.033
BTC 64550.89
ETH 3156.32
USDT 1.00
SBD 4.30