In her newly releases third part Alison Tieman's (@Typhonblue) talks the marketing of disruptive products and how they are marketed while applying this mens rights as a new disruptive process. Of course it would not be an Honey Badger Video video if there was no shilling involved. This time for the HBR fundraiser to get the Honey Badger to the International Conference on Men's Issues (2018). Alison also addresses some of her critiques.

The negative sum game is Alison Tieman's conjecture on charity and donations where male and gender neutral issues are involved. Her conjecture is that you get less or even no support for gender neutral issues and hence feminism tries to artificially gender issues, making them women only, even when men are affected just as much, in order to get more charity donations.

I links added all three parts to the post for your binge watching pleasure.

How Men's rights is a dead end and what to do about it

“If a social ill is seen to affect women, we care. If it’s seen to affect women because they’re women, we would care even more. But if it’s seen to affect women and men we stop caring about all victims of the social ill entirely. That’s the negative sum game and it plagues not only men’s rights but all efforts to solve the problems facing humanity.”

How men's issues show men's strength

“What if men are doing mental health just fine and don't need feminists to fix them? How feminist men's mental health initiatives are toxic charity and what to do about it. ”

How disruptive is men’s rights?

“Crossing the chasm, addressing criticism and why conferences are critical.”

#mensrights #men #charity