Sort:  
  • Trending
    • [-]
     5 years ago 
    $0.74
    • Past Payouts $0.74, 0.00 TRX
    • - Author $0.56, 0.00 TRX
    • - Curators $0.18, 0.00 TRX
    7 votes
    Reply
    [-]
     5 years ago 
    $1.30
    • Past Payouts $1.30, 0.00 TRX
    • - Author $0.98, 0.00 TRX
    • - Curators $0.32, 0.00 TRX
    7 votes
    Reply
    [-]
     5 years ago 

    Thank you for your answer, and i apologize for not saying it correctly. What i men was good and evil/bad.

    [-]
     5 years ago 
    $0.09
    • Past Payouts $0.09, 0.00 TRX
    • - Author $0.07, 0.00 TRX
    • - Curators $0.02, 0.00 TRX
    8 votes
    Reply
    [-]
     5 years ago 

    Thank you for your well explained answer, i see that you got my point, what i did not explained correctly. I apologize for that. With right and wrong, i men good and bad or evil. But from your comment i see you already noticed that!

    My point was, if science can't proof what is good and evil, does that mean we can't use good and evil in our society or justice system, were scientific facts are our guidelines?

    [-]
     5 years ago 
    $0.08
    • Past Payouts $0.08, 0.00 TRX
    • - Author $0.07, 0.00 TRX
    • - Curators $0.01, 0.00 TRX
    9 votes
    Reply
    [-]
     5 years ago (edited)

    Thank you for your answer.

    With right and wrong i exactly men good and bad, but that was my fault for not explaining that in the "right" way, only after i saw the comments i realized, damn i men good and bad, and not if science can't figure out mathematics!!

    So my point is, a lion could kill a animal and would not consider to bad, but on the moment a human kill then he would consider to be evil. While both are doing something to satisfied their needs, what ever the reason a murder is.

    Now im not saying that it's good to kill, but i do say what ever morals we use, they seem to be measured by the morals of religion. Or how else could science determine if a action is good or bad?

    That saying if religion can't proof if good and bad exist, then how could science use good and bad in our justice system? People would say, that man is evil because he done this or that. But how can you proof scientifically what evil is?

    Yeah because people lost someone and they have pain and this or that, that's true. But with animals is the same thing, they also feel the pain of lost. What makes us different from animals?

    What can be good for the spider, can be bad for the fly! Does that make the spider evil, or is our universe created in a way that good and evil do not exist?

    So my first question should have be, how could science proof what is good and what is evil without using the morals of religion?

    And if science can't proof what is good and what is evil, does that make that good and bad is a illusion or just a belief? And if that's a belief then we can't talk about good and evil in the world, without evidence. Correct me if am wrong...

    Coin Marketplace

    STEEM 0.32
    TRX 0.12
    JST 0.033
    BTC 64647.16
    ETH 3160.49
    USDT 1.00
    SBD 4.13