Can't see the forest for the trees when it comes to decision making

in #philosophy6 years ago

Did you ever have the chance to do what you thought was the right thing to do but didn't because of the possible negative implications upon yourself? Most adults have been in that situation professionally or personally; Have had to make a choice between what they felt was the right action or decision and self preservation on the other hand.

It happened to me at work last week. I was forced to make a choice between the best interests of the business [and myself] and the best interests of a client. I chose the client for various reasons. It was an easy choice and as a manager I had the ability to make it with impunity. Still, a part of me knew that the business would have wanted me to choose differently.

Taking a stand like that is not always as simple as it seems though and making tough decisions can be more difficult than first expected or anticipated.

Many people have faced a moral dilemma of choice and have opted for the safe option, the one that preserves their position rather than what was obviously the right action. I also know people that had to make split-second choices between doing what was right and suffering physical injury or death, or opting for the safe, comfortable choice and self preservation. On the battlefield that happens all the time.

Fortunately most of us never have such decisions to make; I say fortunately because most are simply ill-equipped to make decisions like that, or extremely unwilling. We do need to make tough decisions in life though.

Making tough decisions and choices can leave a person feeling isolated and alone, especially when the decision may lead to some eventual negative...And so many people simply avoid it. Is that really the right choice though? Choosing not to make a decision is a decision in itself after all right? Of course it is.

In my experience the best decisions one can make are ones that are made independently of other people's influences, opinions or prejudice's. That doesn't mean one can't seek information and guidance from others, only that I believe the end-decision should be made independently and by the person faced with the choice.

Why? Well, a decision made solely by the individual can't be blamed on anyone else if the results are less than desired. If someone else was involved then it's an easy thing to go ahead and lay blame on them for the resulting poor result rather than taking ownership as the decision-maker. Of course, I refer to sole-decision-maker situations here. A couple will make decisions jointly of course, but still need to make them independently of other people's influences, opinions or prejudice's.

Making tough decisions independently of other people influence means the decision-maker is responsible for the success or failure of the decision and there's no room for blame; Only responsibility and ownership. Blame is negative, un-productive and ignorant.

Decision-making takes a certain commitment; During the process of decision-making and also in the after-decision period. Taking ownership of the choices and their resulting effects, good or bad, is really the only way to move forward.

We are faced with the need to make decisions in our lives almost daily, some of which could be tough ones but there's one decision that should be easy to take...And that's the decision to come to a decision in the first place.

Image source

Sort:  

Only vaguely related, I've always been amused by how many people rush to take/share credit when a decision turns out to be a good one but are overly eager to lambast and blame and otherwise distance themselves as much as possible from it when it's not. I think that's pretty lame XD

And why does the decision to make a decision seem so disproportionately difficult?! Or maybe it's just me XD

And why does the decision to make a decision seem so disproportionately difficult?! Or maybe it's just me XD

Some are decision makers and some not. Making, or not making a decision is a choice and either will end with results of some sort.

Close to success, distance from failure. We won, they lost.

But we expect someone else to step up, we want them to take the blame. Most of us are raised to believe there's a safety net, that we're responsible sure, but you know, like in a game, not really. Especially if something bad happens. Then we really don't want to be responsible. And we scream and pout because the person we thought would step forward - our parent, spouse, boss, friend, whoever really - does not.

I think that's why many of us sink into depression, alcohol, drugs, whatever sort of escapism we can find - because we thought we knew what it meant to be responsible. And then we make the choice and wish to God there was someone else to take responsibility and there isn't and we can't bear it...:/

The feeling of responsibility is one that is foreign to most people which is why they involve others in decision-making I think. Not everyone, but many. It's comfortable to have a scape-goat in the advent that the decision doesn't harvest a a satisfactory result.

I learned early on in life that it's better to be responsible for my decisions than to find the safety-net of someone to blame for resulting problems. It's called ownership.

It's just part of human nature. At times situations are outside of our control and others within When I can influence something myself I leap at the chance. Leaders do. Followers do not. The world needs both. (I don't necessarily mean leaders of others...Leaders in ones' own life).

I think it's important that you learn this early in life, as you say you did, because I imagine that if you spend 30 years of your life (or 50 or whatever) involving others and blaming others, when the moment comes for you to learn this lesson, you just reject it, because your resolve's weakened, you've lived your whole life on someone else's shoulders.
And you can't just move unto your own - you haven't developed their ability to hold under pressure, to sustain the blame...

I'd rather stand, or fall, knowing I took the responsibility for my own actions and decisions.

One of the few good ones <3

:)

The whole point of meetings is to pool blame and credit for outcomes.

No one wants to take decision making responsibility. Even experts like doctors do not recommend to clients, they give options. Perhaps it is for insurance purposes.

I always try to choose the Right decesion morally and try to put less emphassis when I can on the benefits to me, and as you said it's harder than it appears and I find myself choosing the opposite sometimes. At least I try...

You got a 42.43% upvote from @ocdb courtesy of @galenkp!

Hi @galenkp!

Your post was upvoted by @steem-ua, new Steem dApp, using UserAuthority for algorithmic post curation!
Your UA account score is currently 4.213 which ranks you at #2755 across all Steem accounts.
Your rank has not changed in the last three days.

In our last Algorithmic Curation Round, consisting of 249 contributions, your post is ranked at #211.

Evaluation of your UA score:
  • Some people are already following you, keep going!
  • Try to show your post to more followers, for example via networking on our discord!
  • Try to work on user engagement: the more people that interact with you via the comments, the higher your UA score!

Feel free to join our @steem-ua Discord server

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.27
TRX 0.11
JST 0.033
BTC 63900.26
ETH 3063.07
USDT 1.00
SBD 4.21