Social Marxist Hivethink in Neo-Feminist groups have done Everything to Destroy Men, but Could they be Slowly Regretting it ?
The Rise of Feminism has since the late fifties demanded that men recognise the egality of men and women in the workforce and in the wider society ! It is a tool of social engineers,if you asked me, a socially destructive tool of division, breaking up couples and families alike ! In short a disaster !
I am sure that no man would no longer seriously argue agressively that a womans place is the the home holding the baby today ! Infact it would seem that the young couples now live in a system where there is not especially gender related roles in the house ! Where the cleaning of the house, washing up and looking after the toddlers is a shared thing ! A good thing I am sure most would agree on the fac ae of it !
But research shows that a couple practising this sort of 2 "Eglaitarioan" relationship, built on the sharing of houise chores in a non gender specific iway in their home and couple ! Are indeed less likly to have a happy and fulfiilled sex life ! As secretly when the woman sees her man doing what she knows to be a "demeaning task" She loses respect and sexual desire for himWho could have guessed that eh ?? )))) lol So clearly a dangerous vicious circle for a couple with the origional intent of being together to build a family and stable enviroment to raise children !
So today to back up this somehat controversial claim I know I make in this post )) I am sharing three videos taken from Youtube that will back up I think my statement !
The first is a brilliantly hard hiting breakdown by Sargon of Akkad of a recent interveiw on British Television Chnanle 4 where the amazing Jordan Peterson is interveiwed by a rather agressive female presenter by the name of Cathy Newman. Who i think we could safely say represents the archetypal new " dominant" woman b orn from the 90,s ! Successful, overworked and clearly pretty angry against men for being who they seem to be for her, a rival ! Sargon of Akkad goes through key points of the interveiw which trulñy is something really to see and hear if this subject interests you, as Jordan Peterson brilliantly dismantles her " marxist" gender politcally based arguments, which just fsall flat on their face, one after a bloody another !
The real low point of her clear Hate of Men being when she asked Mr Peterson !
" So what should Women be doing for men do you think ? "
he replied " You should be helping them ! "
To which she replies " Why would we do that ? ?? "
...................... Reeeeeeeeaaaaaly Cathy, so you openly admit that you dont want to help men ????? I mean seriously ? Are men now veiwed as the enemy now by your sort, to be held forever in your crosshairs until they surrender all Power so you can take Over the Whole World ?? Is that what you want, really ?? !!!
Channel 4 News’ full, fiery interview with clinical psychologist and professor Jordan B Peterson, whose views on gender have amassed great controversy - and a huge online following. He discusses the pay gap, patriarchy and his new book "12 Rules for Life."
Why Did Cathy Newman Lose to Jordan Peterson?
Sargon of Akkad
Published on 18 Jan 2018
The feminist problem with equal treatment is that they are being treated like men.
So moving on to the next two videos which come from the higly intelligent Vlogger Blondie who has, as a woman, decided to pick up the defence of men and stand by them to make them stronger together as people ! Realising that she herself in her private life had become miserable for her inabliity to communicate in a nice way with the men her life, to do it in a way which made them happy and so as a consequence finding happiness herself, after many years of traumaticf disappointments and pain ! She simply decided to relax her once judgemental knee jerk reactions built into her psyche for years by university installed anti men hivethink mentaliies and quite simply becamee a woman again, one that openly loves and needs men. To which i say..... good on you and why not indeed ?? Why is that so bad to be a woman ?? Or a man for that matter ??
Do Women Secretly WANT Patriarchy?
Blonde in the Belly of the Beast
Published on 8 Jun 2018
Evolutionary traits suggest so! I used Sweden as a case study to examine the (formerly) baffling unholy alliance between feminists and Muslim migrants.
Gender Roles & the Myth of Egalitarianism
Blonde in the Belly of the Beast
Published on 24 Sep 2017
Masculine female/feminine male pairing and the merit of egalitarianism.
" At the End of all this Bitching about Geneder Identity Politcs, Most Nen and Women Need Each Other, as Equals to have Fun and Raise a Family and Build a Future ! "
Your thoughts and reactions to my post, as ever much appreciated in the comment section below !
SteemOn4Truth
SteemOn4Truth
I think things are going to get a whole lot better in the future. Having women raise children is very unnatural, it is a result of the industrial revolution, that's what took men out of the home. Prior to that a man's children would join him in the fields or on the hunt or in the house while the women toiled. As a result we have generations of children raised by women. But now things are changing, men in record numbers are staying home to raise children, for the first time in a long time we will have a generation of children raised by men. It should be interesting.
@funbobby, did you see any of the videos i have placed here on tis post ?? As I think that men raiing women in a motherly sense at home is actually not a good idea ! I liked what yoiu said about the pre industriual revolution education of children being made by men in the feilds and other workplaces ! It could not think of a better start to life than learning from experience and hands on methods ! Maybe a better model for future genrations ?? Interesting is not alwasy good being my last words on this !!
"may you live in interesting times" is allegedly an ancient Chinese curse. I think children raised by men won't be such a bunch of pussies. It will be good to have little girls and boys raised hunting and fishing and not being coddled as much.
Well, you are not wrong, but also not correct.
But to explain this i would need to introduce the world to something that isn't in the collective consciousness yet. And so... it is like an impossible task.
Women decided to have men. It becomes better from an evolutionary survival point of view to have men and women. Men are strong, brutes, defenders. So that women can be soft, weak/subtle, nurtures.
It didn't have to be this way, women decided it would be this way.
Anyway, what you said is based on human nature. At this time, human nature is changing. And so, trying to solve things going into the future, with the way things were... will not work out so well.
It means... if i am reading the change correctly that we will see women being born that find attractive more egalitarian men.
But the only thing i can say for certain is that men are becoming more feminine and women are becoming more masculine.
However, with tons of soy-boys and Cathy's out there, it will seem like men are becoming more masculine and women becoming more feminine. (but if you compared men to the viking men, they will be more feminine)
I agree with you, that feminism was designed to destroy the family and society. All it did was given women thoughts of having it all. Instead of saying, well here are your choices, and each choice limits your future choices. (sorry lady, that's reality) So, in everything, women are disappointed.
The big problem is women do not think.
If they did, Cathy'ites would say, OMG, look what we did. We better fix this quickly.
Oh so you are saying that we were once in a matriachal system where men were just the brutes to be used for work and war ! While the society was directed and built with the decisions of woemn ?? Yes I have heard of this being somewhat the cae in the British Isles at the time of the Celts if indeed we shouldcall them that ?? Perhaps you,d like to expand your theory here @builderofcastles ?
Yes, throughout pre-history, mankind's energy path has switched. Like blowing hot then cold, or in then out. Currently men are overtly in charge with women being covertly in charge. It has been the opposite many times.
And no, the matriarchy is not this lovely place, it is many ways far more brutal than the supposed patriarchy.
Women should be cautious, because "My body, My choice" doesn't work at all in a matriarchy.
Hopefully, at this point of change, we, mankind, can change to both/neither being in charge.
Interesting this @builderofcastles, and yes your conclusion is the one that I think we need to see in our future once released from this scourge of " zionist world domination" plan !!