The psychology of near-drowning as a mind-control technique [Secret Doors, Hidden Rooms, Chapter 2.2]

in #psychology5 years ago (edited)

lake-2254240_960_720.jpg

Near-drowning is a trauma-based mind control technique.

The general public knows it well in the form of ‘waterboarding’, a method of torture widely used by ‘occult’ groups like the CIA. However, it has also been used for many centuries by practitioners like the Catholic Church, who used it during the Spanish Inquisition and elsewhere.

Waterboarding involves pouring water onto a cloth over the victim’s forehead and eyes, interspersed with moments of relief in which the victim can breathe. This technique simulates near-drowning and is similar to techniques used by occult (or ‘hidden) ritual abuse groups to trauma-condition children.

Waterboarding (or ‘near-drowning’) has been a method of ritual abuse used by the US Government’s occult divisions throughout several engineered wars including those in Iraq and Afghanistan. This ritualized drowning method has also been used, together with other mind-control techniques, in torture camps like Guantanamo Bay.

Waterboarding is just one form of near-drowning used by Master Psychologists to control and program human beings. It appears to be a refined and lower-risk adaptation of traditional ritual abuse methods in which victims are forcibly submerged in water to the point of near-drowning, and then, often, ‘rescued’ by an abuser.

Because near-drowning has been a tool in the repertoire of international pedophile rings like the Catholic Church and other ‘religious’ groups for centuries, its effects are well-understood by the Master Psychologists. It is simple to enact, and therefore commonly practiced. We see uncomfortable soft-echoes of it in the concept of baptism and other organized 'religious' use of water rituals involving infants who are sometimes killed in the process as well as adults.

Near-drowning creates a trauma bond

The experience of being near-drowned and then subsequently rescued by the perpetrating group or individual sets up an intentional paradox in the mind of the victim, typically a child: The abuser undertakes the role of both the perpetrator and the saviour at the same time. This is exactly the type of cognitive dissonance that Master Psychologists seek to create in their targets. It creates a deep connection between the victim and the abuser(s) — a connection known as a trauma bond.

During near-drowning, the child is forcibly held underwater until the point that the ‘trainer’ determines that drowning is close to occurring, then the child is pulled out of the water. At this point, the child may be issued instructions (programming) and then the process is repeated. This abuse technique can induce many splits in the psyche and, as with other methods, is designed to compartmentalize the child’s mind into subdivisions of self.

Near-drowning is a rapid and cheap way for occult groups to establish trauma bonds in children (and sometimes adults). Near-drowning is enacted in a variety of ways and has been known to involve bodies of water as small as a bucket or a sink, and as large as a swimming pool, lake, river or ocean.

Access to larger bodies of water for the purpose of this form of abuse obviously poses a greater risk of discovery for groups who participate in the conditioning of children in this way. Many groups — for example, some Freemasonic groups — are known to have easy access to swimming pools which they use for this purpose.

Using lakes and rivers to near-drown children pose more risk to the perpetrators as they may attract public attention. However, these occult groups are well aware that a screaming child rarely attracts much attention in our mind-controlled societies and that most adults will readily accept the explanations offered by perpetrators: typically, that they are rescuing the child from drowning.

The advantage to occult groups of using open water, like a lake, is that they can combine multiple aversions into a single act of trauma-conditioning. The child subjected to torture in open water will not only form a trauma bond with the occult group who is abusing them, but is also likely to be conditioned to fear water and natural settings. As natural spaces like lakes are healing spaces which calm and connect human beings with their planet, the abusers achieve two acts of disconnection by choosing to near-drown a child in a natural setting such as a lake or ocean: They disconnect the child from his or her own body (dissociation is common during and after such abuse) while also creating an aversion to nature itself.

Life_05-22-1902.JPG
'Water curing' by U.S. troops in the Philippines, 1902 Life magazine cover.

Long-term effects of near-drowning

The long-term consequences of associative-conditioning induced by near-drowning is well evidenced. Allen Keller, the director of The New York University Program for Survivors of Torture observed that survivors of waterboarding (near-drowning) were permanently traumatized and feared all contact with water, including taking showers or contact with rain. [Mayer, The New Yorker, 2008.]

Many ritual abuse groups therefore choose to locate their trauma-conditioning camps in isolated locations close to open water, like a lake, because this provides easy and discrete access to a space where they can near-drown children.

The ultimate objective of much trauma-based mind-control is to disconnect people from their bodies and nature — making them easily-controlled — and many rituals have been specifically designed to induce deep dissociation. The more an occult group can separate their victims from connection with the body, the more easily that victim can be trained to dissociate under other circumstances. In other words: a person who has learned to dissociate as a survival method will more easily slip into that ‘mode’ during future abuse. The transition can become automatic in the survivor and allows occult groups to subject the victim to abuse in the future without the necessity of additional trauma to split-off their memories of the experience. Instead, the survivor starts to split automatically.

Near-drowning is known to be used in conjunction with other ritualistic elements by occult groups. For example, some groups will wear costumes, such as cloaks, when near-drowning the child. Additional props may also be introduced and the victim’s hands and/or feet may be bound together. This serves the purpose of instilling deeper fear, and also furnishes a clearer narrative of ‘being saved’ by the perpetrator in the mind of the victim: If the perpetrator clearly unbinds the child’s hands when ‘rescuing’ them from the water, the trauma bond is more likely to be established. This type of abuse is also known to be enacted inter-generationally. For example, fathers in occult groups will be invited to ‘save’ their daughters from near-drowning in occult rituals.

Abusers combine near-drowning with other trauma-based mind-control techniques. Near-drowning may precede or follow spinning, sexual violence, or any other combination of techniques exposed elsewhere in this book. Often Master Psychologists have devised combination techniques in their occult rituals and a child may be subjected to several methodologies in sequence.

More elaborate uses of water in ritual abuse include flooding enclosed rooms to give the impression that a victim is soon to drown in the rising water. Other situations can be devised in which abusers use water and the threat of drownings is to split, manipulate and traumatize victims. Our best defence against these ongoing forms of trauma-based mind control is to expose these methods and raise awareness of their common use by Master Psychologists and their occult groups.

You can read the next section of this book here. It covers the use of 'burial' by occult groups.

Previously published sections:

Chapter 1
1.0 Our village is sick
1.1 What is Mind control?
1.2 Engineered Ignorance of the Occult
1.3 The History of Mind Control
2.0, 2.1 Splitting and Spinning

Related topics for further research:

Dunking
Baptism

NOTE:

If you are reading this sometime in the distant future, please be aware that this is a draft chapter section from the book Secret Doors, Hidden Rooms: Understanding and Deprogramming Trauma-Based Mind-Control systems which may now be available as a complete and finished book. It will contain much more detail and an updated text. Try searching for it online.

Sort:  

Hello again 🔆 ......this time just commenting on your use of 'Steemit'. My thoughts on this:

  • Steemit.com is not the Steem blockchain
  • Your footer refers to possible future readers. It is extremely likely that in time steemit.com will have been superseded as the most popular UI for accessing the Steem blockchain and this may therefore be technically incorrect (and perhaps mildly confusing to some)
  • Have you tried using an alternative like steempeak.com? The difference is night and day :)

Hi @barge.
I took at look at Steempeak — intriguing!

How would you advise permalinking to posts on the Steem blockchain then?

Thanks :)

Ha, yes, now there is a question I have pondered over. I did this in relation to a 'blogmap' that I created last year. At the time, I had considered it best to include links to both steemit.com as well as to steampeak.com. I did this as most people were (and still are) accessing the Steem blockchain through steemit.com.

However, I am in the (thought) process of redoing my blogpage and when I do so, I think I will only provide steampeak.com links.

The thing is of course that steemit.com may remain the most popular interface (although I seriously doubt this), and there are other popular ones (busy, steeve, esteem etc) and also many folk use their smart phones (partiko etc).

For my way of working, I'd rather send folk to steampeak.com than to steemit.com as the interface is more attractive and I often send my blogmap link to folk I know who are not on the blockchain. As for the issue of 'familiarity' ie folk getting 'pissed off' or confused over being sent to a different interface (not to mention that this is presented as an 'external link' on steemit.com, as opposed to internal, steemit.com links), well I'm personally not bothered if someone doesn't read my stuff coz they are put off by a different medium :).

It may not actually be so much of an issue to post steemit.com links (unless Stinc disappears altogether of course :) as the various user interfaces are able to display other blockchain UI urls within their own UIs (both steemit.com and steampeak.com do this).

Nothing clear I'm afraid @kida :)

PS: If you'd like some more on SP, I posted an article a while ago. It contains further links and some background info.

Curated for #informationwar (by @wakeupnd)

Ways you can help the @informationwar!

  • Upvote this comment or Delegate Steem Power. 25 SP 50 SP 100 SP or Join the curation trail here.
  • Tutorials on all ways to support us and useful resources here

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.31
TRX 0.11
JST 0.034
BTC 66765.98
ETH 3234.00
USDT 1.00
SBD 4.23