The True Theory of Everything: Link Compilation
Welcome all! To the Theory of Everything link page!
It's perfectly fine to be skeptical. But there is only one way to find out if there is merit to the content. So, let's just jump right in. I have written a lot of posts, this one is to bring a bit of sequential order to the scattered disarray.
Where to Begin
The best place to start is with the specific reasoning. Read on and if you get close enough you might just find yourself pulled in.
How Gravity Causes Electromagnetic Fields: Explanation for how gravity causes electromagnetic fields.
The Big Bang's Big Assumption: This article describes the history of the Big Bang model and focuses on the assumptions behind it. It further goes on to propose an alternative explanation for how cosmological redshift is produced by gravity instead of motion, and concludes that this is the case by simultaneously demonstrating how gravity also causes electromagnetism.
How Light Really Works: Explanation for how gravity causes electromagnetic waves.
How Electric Charges are Caused: Simple explanation for the actual mechanisms behind electrical charges.
The Double-Slit Experiment in the Infinite Universe: Describes what the real mechanisms behind the Double-Slit experiment's results are.
Gravity: Zero-Point Pressure: Explains the true nature of gravity.
The Cosmic Cell: A novel means for alternative energy: Explains the principles for how to harness the power of gravity to produce alternative energy.
The Universal Principle of Natural Philosophy and The Simple Reality: My original research paper (08/2014), it's accompanying YouTube video (01/2015), and my book (06/2017) can be found here.
Philosophy
The Principles of Truth: Physics and consciousness work identically. Analysis of truth as a system having a field that interacts with our mental states.
The Meaning of Life: Life is a story and it contains a very specific "take-home message", which is the meaning of life.
Finding the Ground Level in Science: Discussion of where the starting point of understanding is and why.
When Newton's Laws were Held in Esteem: Too quickly we have jumped away from what is logical to develop confusing and hard to explain or understand models that simply have no connection with reality. This sheds light onto the importance of holding what is recognizably true to be so even when we don't understand how.
Science's Logical Fallacies: Dismissal Due to Lack of Understanding: More discussion on the mistake of looking away from logic-based natural philosophy to force-fitting models.
The Dance Between All That Is and All That Isn't: Explanation for how "Infinity" and "nothing" give rise to everything we see.
The Sharpened Point of Scientific Progress: Advancements in scientific progress come through more precise understanding rather than added complexities.
Physics of Consciousness: Activation Energy: Applies concepts known in physics to the processes of consciousness to demonstrate that each function the same and how one can therefore be understood through the lens of the other.
Physics of Consciousness: Gravity: Describes how consciousness can accumulate mental mass which then interacts with other consciousnesses through identical mechanics as gravity.
The Philosophy of Chaos Theory: Chaos theory is far more applicable to everyday life than weather systems; everything comprises this intrinsic unpredictability property.
Infinity
Infinity Unbounded: This article goes into what infinity is and what it means to be limitless.
The Universe has Infinite Dimensions: Details how the Universe's infinite dimensions exist within one single three-dimensional space.
The Ether Explained: Discusses the ether with respect to the Infinite Universe.
The Universe Is Fractal!: Details why the universe is fractal, having ever smaller and larger versions of systems repeating themselves in infinite dimensions relative to one another.
The Universe Is Infinite: The universe is the manifestation of infinity.
Structures of the Universe: Describes the assumptions made around systems such as atoms and the importance of distinguishing what is known from what is thought to be known. Describes a process for extracting further information about systems through comparisons with other observed systems.
The Spectrum of Time: Discusses the age of the universe.
The Limitations of Technology: Describes why a perceived limit is not an actual limit, and that no matter how far we stretch our ability to observe deeper into infinity, we still see essentially nothing of Infinity.
Observational Details
In this section, these articles provide unique interpretations of observations as supplemental evidence.
Observable Einstein Cross of Galaxy Clusters: Discusses galaxy clusters around the Great Attractor and provides basis for why various observed clusters, thought to be distinct and separate galaxies of their own, are optical illusions produced by the gravitational lensing of the Great Attractor which leads to the production of a large-scale Einstein Cross. Due to their distance of apparent separation and the lack of an obvious central lensing object, these Einstein Cross galaxy clusters were assumed to be different and distinct.
Temperature is a Measure of Mass per Volume: Discusses why the measurement of temperature is actively measuring the mass per volume within a system's "empty space" between atoms.
Michelson and Morley Ether Experiment Missing Link: Describes flaws in the ether experiment and why the results and conclusions of the experiment were invalid.
James Maxwell Knew that Magnetism was due to the Ether: Quotes of James Maxwell shows he recognized the ether's role in producing magnetic fields.
The Big Bang's Misinterpretation of the Cosmic Microwave Background: The CMB is not the "remnants of the Big Bang"; this article approaches the CMB with the Infinite Universe in mind and provides a simple answer to its cause.
Number of Galaxies in the Universe Compared to Atoms in 1 cubic centimeter of Air: A simple comparison of galaxies to atoms in a very small volume to demonstrate why the proposed limit for the number of galaxies in the universe is unreasonable and illogical.
An Explanation of Dark Flow in the Universe: Discusses apparent "dark flow" and why our entire observable universe would likely be influenced into flowing "as one" by larger systems.
What It All Means
In this section, I will reference articles that are mainly written as conclusions based on the above foundational interpretations.
The Observer Assumption: With all of science, we fail to remove ourselves from the equation when determining the characteristics of relative objects. This relativity to our own mass and atoms leads to inadvertent misinterpretations of the universe across a wide array of fields.
Photons Do Have a Mass: Photons are no different than any other observed system in the cosmos. This article points out the assumptions in calling photons "massless" as well as describing why differentiation is flawed.
Light and How it Travels to Reach Earth: Discusses gravitational lensing and its role in producing the apparent observable universe that we see.
The Biggest Mistake With Galaxy Mapping: Describes why our galactic mapping approach is completely and utterly inaccurate due to lack of incorporating large-scale gravitational lensing effects into the mapping models.
We Can See The Milky Way from the Outside: Explains why we would be capable of seeing our very own Milky Way in the galaxies of the distant cosmos.
Actual Image of the Milky Way Galaxy from the Outside: Our galaxy, said to be "very rare, and could have been one of a kind", is able to be seen from the outside due to large-scale gravitational lensing effects that brings light emitted by the Milky Way, eventually, back to our eyes for observation.
Black Holes are Optical Illusions: Describes why the appearance of black holes as singularities is an illusion.
The Truth about Black Holes: Further discussed the singularity aspect of black holes as illusions.
What is a Black Hole?: Further discusses black holes and their history to describe why they are misinterpreted.
Black Holes Can Supernova Too!: Yep. Everything functions the same. Black holes are no different.
Electrons Are Not Identical: Similar systems can be interpreted as the same, when we do not recognize discrepancies and conclude identicalness. This article discusses why no electrons are truly identical.
The Electron and Proton in the Infinite Universe: Discusses the history of atomic interpretation and targets assumptions made for reconsideration.
Empty Space is Anything But Empty: The "empty space" of the Infinite Universe is not empty, but rather is filled with infinity. Ever smaller particles fill in the gaps between ever smaller particles, creating an infinite array within each point in space.
Temperature - Absolute Zero: Describes why absolute zero is unattainable.
How the Universe Really Works! - The Photoelectric Effect in the Infinite Universe: Discusses the photoelectric effect with respect to the Infinite Universe.
Why Galactic Rotations Are So Off: Gravitational lensing plays a critical role in apparent distances between objects. When an object is so massive that its gravitational lensing makes it appear as a singularity, the voluminous space it occupies is misinterpreted as being zero and this leads to calculations of galactic rotations that are simply wrong.
Earth
Origins of Water on Earth: Where'd all the water on Earth come from? Asteroids? This article details how Earth itself created it.
The Mechanism for the Expanding Earth: Describes what caused Earth to expand.
Videos
Youtube Channel: This is where my videos are.
Live 24-hour stream: The Life of a Mad Scientist
I have been streaming my desktop and my day-to-day life for any to see. Feel free to come hang out, ask questions, check out what I am up to, or whatever you would like to do at any of the following links:
Conclusion
Herein, I have provided groupings of links for easy navigation to related topics. This is how the universe functions on its most fundamental level from a scientific standpoint. I hope you do check it all out!
-Steve Scully
The "Theory of Everything" Guy
My website: CascadingUniverse.Org
Isn't it true that Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems prove any theories that use mathematics cannot be made complete and consistent?
There is an alternative in the Vedas, which use ternary logic and an inverted reduction process, and says,
SB 4.29.2b: Everything happening within time, which consists of past, present and future, is merely a dream. That is the secret understanding in all Vedic literature.
http://Www.vedabase.com/en/sb/4/29/2b
The Vedas were praised for providing insight that helped the pioneers of quantum theory to begin to understand what they were trying to study. For example,
“Access to the Vedas is the greatest privilege this century may claim over all previous centuries."
J. Robert Oppenheimer
To ultimately sum up the above work, it says: The universe is Infinite.
Math is an approximation by its very nature. For example, if we attempt to determine the movement of a planet around the sun, if we don't account for other planets we will be inaccurate. If we account for other planets, we will increase accuracy but we will still not be accounting for other systems. As the universe is infinite, it is impossible to account for all infinite systems. So, yes, I would agree that it is impossible to write an equation or set of equations that encompasses all that is. However, that does not preclude us from recognizing the universe to be the manifestation of infinity.
Regarding the Vedas, they are a portion of all that is. Like any portion of all that is, they contain a portion of the truth. But no single portion of all that is contains the whole truth; that is reserved for all things as a whole. While there are truths in the Vedas, many are not even able to be extracted without careful consideration of a large enough spectrum of sources so as to understand the universe's Infinite nature.
Quantum theory is an invalid model that violates exactly what you mention of the incompleteness theorems. They attempt to contain within a single set of equations the entire fundamental workings of the universe, and in so doing they are inherently built as an approximation that falls apart with ease the further from the source of approximation an observation is. They do not recognize the infinite structure of the universe and as such cannot in any way describe the universe, as it is the manifestation of infinity.
The Vedas are certainly of value and I agree that they contain vast wisdom. However, they alone do not contain all the knowledge of the universe because they, just like an equation, are a limited part of all that is and create only an approximate picture of the infinite universe. When only one source is looked to for information, it produces a skewed reality that is limited. As such, individual sources of information are effectively incapable of capturing the full extent of truth. This even includes individuals such as myself. I do not claim to know everything, but this theory is instead the cornerstone of understanding upon which an infinite progression in knowledge can be obtained without approximation. It is the beginning of understanding rather than the ending.
The Vedas are not speculative, and Sanskrit grammar is arguably superior to mathematics. The Vedas are pure ecstatic knowledge as Kṛṣṇa said in Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam:
SB 11.21.38-40: Just as a spider brings forth from its heart its web and emits it through its mouth, the Supreme Personality of Godhead manifests Himself as the reverberating primeval vital air, comprising all sacred Vedic meters and full of transcendental pleasure. Thus the Lord, from the ethereal sky of His heart, creates the great and limitless Vedic sound by the agency of His mind, which conceives of variegated sounds such as the sparśas. The Vedic sound branches out in thousands of directions, adorned with the different letters expanded from the syllable oṁ: the consonants, vowels, sibilants and semivowels. The Veda is then elaborated by many verbal varieties, expressed in different meters, each having four more syllables than the previous one. Ultimately the Lord again withdraws His manifestation of Vedic sound within Himself.
I didn't call the Vedas speculative. I called them a part of all that is. Because they are. They aren't everything that exists, and thus they do not contain all that exists. Regarding speculation, interpretation of reality using a single source--whatever that source may be--is indeed speculative in nature. Thus it is the speculation of a human being regarding the nature of reality to draw upon the Vedas and the Vedas alone as a basis for the total description of how reality functions. It is impossible to understand one thing without first understanding all things.
Veda means knowledge, and one of the categories of knowledge in the Vedas is Vedānta, which means the conclusion of knowledge. Such a conclusion must be complete and consistent.
The thousands of books of the Vedas are summarized in extremely terse form in the Vedānta-sūtras, and the Vedānta-sūtras are explained in the Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam. Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam describes itself as the literary incarnation of God, not as a part of the universe. The words and texts texts have definite forms represented in the world, but the knowledge they represent is full and absolute.
Multiple books of the Vedas say Brahmā heard the seed verses of the Vedas after he awoke in a world of nothingness, and these sounds taught him how to create the objects of the universe.
The Vedas are traditionally known as apauruṣeya, which means having no human author. Here is an example of a verse from Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam claiming to be of Divine origin, albeit with a somewhat awkward translation from Sanskrit:
SB 11.21.38-40: Just as a spider brings forth from its heart its web and emits it through its mouth, the Supreme Personality of Godhead manifests Himself as the reverberating primeval vital air, comprising all sacred Vedic meters and full of transcendental pleasure. Thus the Lord, from the ethereal sky of His heart, creates the great and limitless Vedic sound by the agency of His mind, which conceives of variegated sounds such as the sparśas. The Vedic sound branches out in thousands of directions, adorned with the different letters expanded from the syllable oṁ: the consonants, vowels, sibilants and semivowels. The Veda is then elaborated by many verbal varieties, expressed in different meters, each having four more syllables than the previous one. Ultimately the Lord again withdraws His manifestation of Vedic sound within Himself.
What do the Vedas have to say about the existence of Christianity? Of Islam? Of science? Do they explain how gravity works? Do they disclose the nature of human beings with relationship to the nature of the cosmos?
I am not questioning their truth. What I am saying, however, is that they cannot be comprehended by purely reading their texts alone. It is impossible.
Let us take the sanskrit you reference. It is not straight-forward nor is it simple to follow. It is not in its original language and is littered with interpretations of those who read it in its more original form and attempted to rewrite it into different languages. Is it to be taken literally or figuratively?
There is One Truth. And if every single person were to study the full texts of the Vedas, they would not arrive at the same perception of what that One Truth is. Because the texts are only part of the Infinite All.
I appreciate your passion for the Vedas and I can admit that I have not studied them as thoroughly as I have many other sources. Indeed, I will be more driven to look into them much more thoroughly now that this conversation has happened. But I don't need to look at them to know that they cannot be understood in a vacuum, because nothing can.
The above post is a compilation of many links. You were driven to respond to my post within minutes. I posted my article at 4:47pm (EST) and you responded at 4:52pm (EST), indicating to me that you did not actually look at the post itself whatsoever but wanted to simply put forth your opinion on something that you felt was stepping on what you hold at highest esteem. What do the Vedas say about disregarding completely what others have to say?