Downvoting, Can It Be Illegal?

in #steem5 years ago

downvoting illegal.png

Downvoting, Can It Be Illegal?


On the Steem ecosystem there are many different opinions about what Steem should be like and how the reward pool can be managed. However, today I would like to discuss with you the possibility of certain downvoting or flagging behavior that could potentially be legally risky.

It is easy for a person to assume that downvoting content on the Steem blockchain would be no different from "smashing the dislike button" on Youtube or on Facebook. Many of these social media sites provide users with the ability to express that they like or dislike a particular piece of content.

So, why would the downvote feature on Steem be any different? Let's look at how Steem is different from all other social networks.

Steem Is A Public Utility


The term utilities can also refer to the set of services provided by these organizations consumed by the public: Coal, electricity, natural gas, water, sewage, telephone, and transportation. Broadband internet services (both fixed-line and mobile) are increasingly being included within the definition.
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_utility)

The politicians are riled by the activities of Twitter, Google and Facebook and it seems new regulations are inevitable. Twitter has been referred to as a public square and for that reason it is argued by many that it no longer has the right to be a private service and should be viewed as a public utility.

This stance is taken by many concerned individuals across several national lines as the liberties acknowledged by nation states around the world are not applied within the ecosystems of these internet businesses.

Unlike in the case of the private corporation managing the social platform Twitter, Steem, however, began immediately as a public utility. While Steemit.com and other frontends are private businesses for the time being and are not viewed as a public utility, the Steem blockchain itself is indeed a public utility owned by everyone and no one.

Similar to Facebook, we are seeing businesses being built on Steem and offering services that are exclusively operating on Steem and are entirely dependent on its ecosystem. Promotional services, contest services, content producing services and other new business services are forming on the Steem blockchain and investing large sums of capital toward these projects.

Steem's "Like" & "Dislike" Buttons Are Unique


People express their feelings about content all the time with a push of either a like or a dislike button on many websites. However, on the Steem ecosystem this ability can have an effect on a business' ability to gain visibility and possibly even function as a business within the Steem ecosystem.

Let's say a business, invested in a purchase of 300,000 STEEM in order to obtain visibility for their own service on their website. They didn't purchase 300,000 STEEM to give other people visibility, but to give themselves visibility, which is a logical action to take by most businesses. So they write articles about their business using their Steem account @selfpromoter, linking to their site and upvote their own content with the 300,000 Steem Power they purchased as a utility token for that very purpose.

However, then a small group of people, let's say 10 people each with 100,000 Steem Power, delegated half their SP to a collectively managed account called @vivalarevolucion, resulting in an account of 500,000 Steem Power. Now, these 10 people subscribe to a particular ideology that is not shared by the capitalism-loving capitalist known as @selfpromoter. These 10 fellows believe Steem is meant exclusively as a meritocracy with a reward pool that must remain sacred and untainted by the dastardly folk that would fill its blocks with memes, spam and other self-serving content. They seek to protect the universal oracle by adding @selfpromoter to a list for their bot to repetitively downvote.

Suddenly, @selfpromoter finds that all of his business' content is condensed and darkened to make difficult to discover by his target audience and all the $ valuations have gone from $3.75 to $0, resulting in a direct loss in ROI of $37 per day, and a larger loss in customer acquisitions.

Additionally, the bot would leave comments on all of his posts referring to the content as either spam, abuse, trash or plagiarism. The bot also threatened any viewers of the content that if they communicated with @selfpromoter they too would be put on a list for downvote harassment. So, @selfpromoter is not only having his expected ROI for investing in STEEM directly assaulted, but his business brand is undergoing defamation and his and all viewers' human rights, particularly freedom of association are being violated by this threatening bot.

All his time and effort has been wasted, his business has suffered economic and defamatory harm and it will take 13 weeks for him to recoop the initial investment amount from the purchase of 300,000 STEEM. All this time, effort and damage to @selfpromoter's reputation has an economic value that a court can appreciate and recognize. The ideologies of a pure community oracle for long-form content in a digital meritocracy is fine and dandy, but personal ideologies don't hold up in a court of law as a legitimate excuse for causing economic harm to a business.

Downvoting an account once or twice can't be used against you. However, if you pursue a business or individual on Steem with the intent to repetitively prevent them from utilizing their purchased Steem Power or performing standard functions on a common public utility such as Steem, be prepared to one day receive a letter from a lawyer.

To @steemitblog, @steempeak, @busy.org

I warmly encourage you to be extra cautious. Accounts such as abusereports refer to Steem users as "trash" and threaten all other users that might be interacting with the account that abusereports deems bad can result in aggression from that account. This is a violation of freedom of association and every Steem-based business hosting a condensor frontend should not tolerate any presence of an account making such a threat.

Downvote/flag harassment is not acceptable and it is the accounts that harass other accounts that should not be tolerated, not the self-voters or bidbot customers. Any activities that are found distasteful by the Steem community should be handled by hardfork changes to the protocol in a code is law approach and not by downvote harassment.

Sort:  

chtdcxr.jpg

Great post and awesome creativity that the Steemit Community needs I feel the same way also it was a recent Steemit poll to expand muting and I feel if muting expansion was implemented it would take care of 65% of your topic and bring a respectful balance to the Steemit Blockchain which it greatly needs at this moment of growth survival I truly appreciate you and would vote you as a witness yes I would thanks stay well and steem on

Thanks @garrettwallace, I really appreciate your nice comment.

I agree about muting. I think downvoting content is completely unnecessary, really, muting solves the problem of having to see content you disagree with. I don't want anyone to be forced to be around the kind of content they dislike, but downvoting content in a harassing way is completely not appropriate.

Thanks again for your comment!

@mack-bot you are systematically harassing me. You and your delegators such as @misterdelegation can become legally liable for damages.

while idiots harrassing is an issue, downvoting is a necessary evil to create balance on the platform. Good luck at trying to create a legal case on a system which is owned by all the nodes that make up the blockchain and are found all over the world.

You don't have to sue all the nodes, just the account that repeats the downvotes. It is simple, Steemit Inc./Steempeak, whatever frontend you use will give up whatever information they have on you and we'll be able to find out who you are. Once that is done its all down hill from there.

Don't think you're anonymous on Steem. You are not.

In fact, all 20 witnesses can be sued. So, they are subject to the laws too. They might one day agree to remove your STEEM from your account. Don't think its impossible, its possible. That's the weakness of DPoS.

If you will recall, there was some pushing to remove STEEM from the Steemit Inc account. It would take a hardfork for that to happen which means the agreement of 17 of the top 20 and someone to actually code that into the blockchain.

As for your premises about lawsuits... that has worked so well on centralized platforms hasn't it? OH wait, hasn't worked at all. So, as I said, good luck with that. You might manage to create a precedent should you try it.


Learn more about SHADE here

Join the fun promoting your post at Pimp Your Post Thursday. Win SHADE or SBI, make friends. Every Thursday in The Ramble

Loading...

Hi @blake.letras

Interesting topic. I never considered downvotes to be illegal and when I think about it then I wonder if any court out there would even take such a case.

Can you imagie being downvoted and losing 10 steem? or even 100 steem? Those would have to be very heavy downvotes to make anyone lose that much. And yet, it's less than 20$.

No court would care about it, I'm afraid.

Yours
Piotr

I'm not talking about one or two whale downvotes. I am talking about downvote harassment which means that an account with a very large amount of SP is downvoting nearly all of your content continually to try and prevent your message from finding an audience in the Steem community.

Not only is that possibly illegal for US residence to do, since that is intentionally seeking to stifle someone's free speech. But if someone's business was completely built around the Steem ecosystem and the flagging account kept downvoting your content consistently it can be very possibly proved as malicious intent to harm that person's business.

It is not just about the loss in STEEM/SBD rewards, but also in customer acquisition and brand reputation.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.30
TRX 0.11
JST 0.033
BTC 64320.07
ETH 3154.23
USDT 1.00
SBD 4.34