Do SMTs make Steem holders venture capitalists?

in #steem6 years ago

I don't really know how SMTs are going to play out but, the more successful iterations that run along the Steem blockchain, the more value the blockchain holds and therefore Steem has. Essentially, it is in all of our best interests to have these magical things not only work but, work very well.

However, with the capabilities they have, it is likely that a great number of attempts are going to fail as they just don't satisfy the needs of a user base adequately or don't have a compelling enough draw for users. I assume there are also going to be a fair percentage of people looking to cash in on an idea and gimmicks rather than the implementation in a repeat of the dotcom bubble, as this happens with most coins already. But some...

I likened the Steem blockchain to the internet and individual SMTs like business websites upon it yesterday, and just like all of the ridiculous things that got supported at the end of the 90s and those that survived, there will be some SMTs that could make massive impressions on the market place and potentially be market leaders or, the value movers of market leaders. People might currently limit Steem to more social aspects however with the Internet of Things, it is possible that they will be applied in some unique ways we are yet to think of.

This is the thing with technology, it is constantly changing and it is hard to predict what will arrive tomorrow that could combine with Steem to supercharge it or, kill it. There is risk in all of this and this is especially true for those who hold Steem or any crypto for that matter as an alternate solution or killing of a need can destroy the entire project. This is the position of venture capitalists isn't it? Investing into uncertainty and Steem Power is most definitely an investment.

I think many people still see that Steem Power is just an investment that gives access to the Steem pool but forget that the SMTs are going to provide a new range of earning potentials and possibly, access to other pools and coins if SMTs choose to empower them or, airdrop to them. On top of this of course, there is the value added to Steem by successful SMTs.

Successful SMTs also bring a stabilizing factor to Steem and the more there are and the more diverse their use case the more anchor points Steem has to protect against drift. There is obviously going to be huge fluctuations in the short term, but the longer the cryptosphere is operating and the more money that pours in, the less it will spike.

SMT's give Steem an opportunity to sink its hooks into multiple areas and potentially industries almost invisibly as in time, SMTs will drift away from needing Steem to be their support and instead it will be a footnote, just like powered by appears at the bottom of websites. Along this path, there will be Steem Power holders working in various ways to support the processes that will lead to successful implementations.

One thing with Steem and the way it works is that there need not be any silent investors, everyone has some voice and some effect even though it might not seem like a great deal now. Having some Steem power may mean that in the future of SMTs, there will be the possibility to get in on the ground floor of some great projects and, it might not actually cost anything if it comes in the form of an airdrop. That is a pretty decent reason to Hold some SP I think.

At the moment, there is a lot of speculation as to just what will be achievable through SMTs but I see this as a great thing as it means that a great deal of ideas get flung about and even though many are not likely to be possible or come close to fruition, they can serve the purpose of idea catalysts as well as hype builders to increase interest.

Out of all the ones that do get started, it really only takes one to get it right to showcase the possibilities to all the potentials. That one might encourage and spawn a host of other SMTs who use a similar model to shift value along their own platforms and business models.

For now, I am personally less interested in the tech behind it and more interested in the use cases that may be possible. Yes, the tech will affect this but if there is a large enough pool of potential ideas, no matter what the tech is capable of there will be some versions that can be adjusted to suit. This way, SMTs can get a running start . This area is also more interesting to me since I am not much of a tech based thinker. Bit by bit though I will increase my understanding to narrow the view.

I think though that if you don't mind taking on a little (read lot) uncertainty ina dynamic industry with incredible potential, holding Steem Power is still the smart investment.

How do you think SMTs will pan out for Steem?

Taraz
[ a Steem original ]

Sort:  

Bunch of hype, big fizzle.....then maybe in a few years something useful comes out of it.

Hope I am wrong but that’s my instinct.

Yep. It is the "maybe in a few years" where the real possibility is. The hype is part of the fun.

SMTs will be a home run for STEEM. They will push this blockchain into Top 10 status very quickly. SMTs will do for it what ERC20 did for Ethereum.

As to your point about VC, I think that applies to all cryptocurrency. This is a new funding model and anyone buying in is essentially funding that venture. There is risk as you pointed out, hence all is speculation. We choose projects based upon merit (in some instances) and hope for the best. Many will fail.

I think you logic is sound on this one. The advantage to hodling STEEM is that all will be built upon it. STEEM is required for bandwidth, something crucial for zero transaction attributes. So why many SMTs will be nothing more than experiments, meaning failure, STEEM will be uplifted by those that are the winners.

You know more about this area than me so I am glad that my mental moel is sound enough at this point. Yes, crypto is all VC but with SMTs rather, than backing individual projects and crossing fingers, Steem holders can back many simultaneously without even having to choose which. That in itself is pretty incredible.

The ore winners the better and that just doesn't go for SMTs, I hope more people will invest a little in SP and make some potential gains later. For some, instead of easing burdens, it could be life changing.

Man I the idea is really great.............. I have been reading about , watching videos and it gets me excited but last few months have made me a little cautious.

Frankly Steemit itself is in beta and things are still getting streamlined and then we see things that are more upsetting then uplifting. Whatever........ coming back to the SMT's. Let me just say that I am excited but I have tempered it down with a dose of practicality. There are no guarantees here but as far as I can see now things are looking positive.

I don't know enough about SMT's and how they will work but gather they will have to work hand in hand with Steem. Hopefully pushing the value up and bring more investment

fingers crossed for great things

I believe SMT's will have a great effect on Steem and its tokens. Such SMT's will increase the usage of the Steem token, and it will make it needed for even more operations. Those worried that the success of the Steem token depends on the Steemit platform alone, will also be challenged by this, as the token will get a much wider usage area with the SMT's.

I do hope we will get some great new platforms launched in this way, and maybe some of them will help cryptos go mainstream... just like the Steemit platform is already doing.

Short-term we might see the price go further down if the bear-market continues, but in the long run, the users will decide. If we can see successful SMT's on the Steem blockchain, it will for sure have a very positive effect on the token value!

Yes, but first SMTs have to be implemented in the blockchain... and then they have to be adopted. It's a pipe dream so far, and hard fork 20 doesn't really include them as far as I know.

It's a pipe dream so far

yes it is, like most VC investments. Luckily, there are other things to do with Steem power in the meantime ;)

I'm still struggling to fully understand the nature and impact of SMTs.

I would think lots of them will be total flops and wake-up calls to self-important people who get the cold shower that they are not nearly as "important" as they would like to think. Some will be marginally successful on a small scale... perhaps with a total capitalization that never exceeds $500K. People will like them, but they have nowhere to go but sideways.

But then there are the "big ones," on which many of these assumptions about SMTs seem based.

Seems to me a lot of people are treating SMTs like the Second coming of Christ, and the ostensible "savior" of Steem. Maybe I don't quite understand how these will work, but to me it strikes me as akin to arguing that we should all buy Microsoft stock because some game maker has created games that run on the Windows operating system.

Sure, that helps Microsoft by creating a long-term demand... but the "real" investment play is in the game maker not in Microsoft.

OK, so a blockchain is a little different. But I am still pondering the possibility that someone comes up with a massively popular SMT, and then what's to keep them from forking the Steem blockchain and creating (let's say) "New Steem" which would do absolutely zip-all for the holders of Steem? And if you consider scalability and value issues... that might even be attractive for someone to do... let's just say their SMT becomes as valuable as Steem, itself. I mean, people forked BTC all over the place... so why not Steem?

Again, I am NOT a "technical guy" and I am looking at this purely from the angle of "people creating apps" and the psychology of marketing and making money... and we need not look very far to realize that greed and selfishness reigns supreme.

But I'm totally willing to get an education in this...

It depends how they set it up I think. For example airdrops on SP would give you some buy in and even if they fork, you still have that drop percentage. Then there is also the operation of running a personal chain, doable of course. Forking happens already like Golos.

Sure, that helps Microsoft by creating a long-term demand... but the "real" investment play is in the game maker not in Microsoft.

It depends how you look at it. Rovio (angry birds) has been firing people for years but, the operating systems they build for are still going strong. If one is able to invest in All of the game makers at the same time with SP, this should be pretty valuable in the long run. Those that do incredibly well, even with a fork will add value to steem before the fork and then after the fork, there is possibility to have a finger in each. (i think)

I think it will come down to how simple it is for a large operator to implement into their existing business models. I think that is where the vale really is. A news site for example could concentrate on its core competence while still being able to monetize their content.

I don't know how it will all play out but there are a lot of potentials.

but forget that the SMTs are going to provide a new range of earning potentials and possibly

I think these people also include STEEMIT INC..they been sitting on it for so long !!

To the question in your title, my Magic 8-Ball says:

It is decidedly so

Hi! I'm a bot, and this answer was posted automatically. Check this post out for more information.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.25
TRX 0.11
JST 0.032
BTC 61041.41
ETH 2947.17
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.85