Funding freedom of Media on Steem

in #steem5 years ago

It is very easy to complain about a system where we must essentially pay (or power up) in order to be able to interact when we have been trained that the internet is free. It isn't, there are server costs, development costs, bandwidth costs, infrastructure costs... the list goes on. People think that other social medias are free, you can comment as much as you want but, we all pay.

Everything has a price

The cost is not only the loss of freedoms, there is a financial cost also because they leverage the community data and sell it to advertisers who in turn drive product placement into the eyes of said community to extract value. If there was no profit in the process, they wouldn't do it and, it is literally a trillion dollar industry once you factor in all associated processes in the supply chain.

Steem is essentially a self-funded system which means users are responsible for keeping the lights on, something people who don't power up some of their earnings at least tend to miss. The internet never has been and never will be free but, if someone wants freedom from things like censorship, it has to be supported by an economy that promotes it. Steem is such an economy that is made possible because of investors willing to pay costs at various points in the supply chain.

Options and choices

The benefit is that if people are able to take the time to invest now, it becomes a self-perpetuating economy that can allow a massive number of people to interact freely (or cheaply) and still have the freedoms that they hope for, without the fears of being banned or controlled. Comparing Steem to a centralized social platform is incomparable unless one finds the common denominator that powers it, Value from a community.

Again, a benefit of Steem for (at least now) is that direct financial support isn't necessary if one is willing to take the time to work with the system, earn from the inflation pool and power up to a point where desired interaction is possible. In many ways, it is like building any skill set, it takes time and development, just like growing Steem Power to increase Resource Credits.

A hobby horse ride

People talk about Steem being a hobby place they like to interact but in general, hobbies have costs of equipment and materials, Steem is no different is it? And, if people see this only as a place to interact free of censorship and control of centralized authority, powering down is not necessary which means that there is an increasing ability to interact. The problem is that people want the benefits of the Steem blockchain but want it delivered in the same manner as the centralized platforms they complain about censorship, demonetization, fake news, insensitive algorithms and political agendas on.

At some point, to have the freedoms that some say they want, they are going to have to put their money where their mouth is and fund some part of it themselves as in a world still governed by economics and costs of service, none of the infrastructure is free. Where it is free for users, it is governed by central authorities and funded by the selling of personal data to target for the advertisers, take your pick.

Opt-in or out

This is an opt-in community and no one is forced to stay but with that option comes limitation and potentially, responsibilities and behavior patterns to remain a part of the community in a way one might want to be here. If one can't interact the way they choose at the moment because of a lack of RCs, then find a way to get more RCs. This can be done via powering up earnings, buying Steem and powering up or convincing a user who is powered up to donate their investment potential through delegation. There is always a cost.

For Steem to continually be able to function and provide service it requires a great deal of varied resources and a community that will invest into it and grow to a point where it can generate various forms of income, not just value from the inflation pool to be dumped on the open markets. Dumping Steem doesn't keep the lights on, nor does it add to one's ability to interact here.

Trained to be "free"

For many, costs of being part of a digital community is a contentious issue because they have been programmed to believe that the internet and these types of platforms are free, without considering the actual costs they pay. These aren't just philosophical costs and freedom of speech things, the trillions generated all come down to community extraction and predominantly wind up in a very small minority of pockets. The engineering of that centralized system is designed to drive profits to the very high and very sharp peak.

Steem is designed differently, as while it does provide some value in the short term, the power is in the ability for users to continually invest themselves into a community that could eventually become self-sufficient and somewhat autonomous from the traditional economic systems. It could even set a pathway for funding large scale development and change in ways that will chip away at the centralized powers that many feel oppress various freedoms of movement.

Complexities of action

This is by far not a simple process yet again, because of the ease of use of other platforms that only have to deliver a compelling experience and find innovative ways to extract money from wallets for their real customers, investors and advertisers, people like to compare. Essentially, while people keep believing (and therefore treating) the Steem community and its currency like it is just another social media and centralized fiat money, they will support the system they might actually be trying to escape. That is fine, that is their choice but, it comes at a cost.

That cost is their freedom of movement as they will put themselves increasingly into the hands of various authorities on which they must rely for their access. However, there is actually a growing number of people who are paying a different cost in the system and that is into the infrastructure, development and bandwidth requirements so that the community can leverage it and keep growing in various ways.

There really is no such thing as freedom in the sense that many believe but, there is freedom of choice and behaviour but, all of it comes with the limitations of opportunity cost and consequence. Those who want to live free but expect others to pay their costs are never going to be free as they are always under the grace (or economic capabilities) of others willing to extend service.

Choices to make

There are a lot of things to think about in this community and most of us have grown up in systems where the thinking is done for us by those we empower, while wondering why we suffer at the hands of the very few. We are accustomed to being presented with simplicity and ease of use where we do not have to invest much time, effort or value to be a part of while being drained blind without awareness.

Love might be free in this world, everything else carries a price. It is okay if you don't want to power up, it is okay of you don't want to invest, okay if you want to dump your Steem at 30 cents, okay if you don't want to find a community or create one, okay if you don't want to participate in all aspects of the community. This is Steem, you can do as you please but like everywhere else, there are consequences and costs involved, no matter which path you take.

These are some of my current thoughts and I have my current ways - You can choose your own.

Taraz
[ a Steem original ]

Sort:  

I really respect your posts, so hopefully you don't take my honest reply here as a negative nelly.

For the vast majority of my time on Steemit I have powered up. Every time I have had a success powered up. I have mined other crypto, shifted it to Steem..powered up.

I have no intention of powering down now...but a few month back I made my target (a reasonable target I set 12 months ago) and decided to move any SBD or Steem off, for the purpose of storing it and powering up when the price of Steem is less - diversification.

Outside of the crypto world I diversitise, shares, bank savings etc. And so far I'm doing ok as I didn't go crazy and put my house in Crypto.

Why? because it's going to go up and down, it's new tech.

For me never powering down is the only thing I can commit to (well at least until March 19 - pending). I love Steem, but I must say I am a bit disappointed in Steem inc. So many have reached out to help, but only now when they are down and out do they come to community with....apparent community driven ideas.

If @ned doesn't keep his promise and have full prod SMT by march I will powerdown for the first time.

If I was running Steeminc. I wouldn't sleep (the $ amount never mattered to me). I believe in the tech, I enjoy the social media side without Adverts (or at least if there are AD's I personally prosper from them as well in someway if they are appear on my post - and I get some choice on the ad).. and I believe in SMT, I really do love the vision and have from the start....I just hate excuses...but that's just me.

This just my thoughts about my personal Steem adventure - not sure how others feel and I'm very open minded, so may change my mind..

Cheers

As @exyle says it’s time to start judging steeminc by what they actually do! A power down if they don’t act is perfectly reasonable!

It is also worth considering what others may start to do in that time between. For those who like to play in multiple steem worlds, keep eyes open on apps, witnesses, full nodes etc....

Fair point, but exyle was just talking about steeminc at the time! (Well, and the witnesses in the same video.

I'm presently musing over what meaningful decentralisation is.... I mean in terms of data storage. I'm struggling to comprehend how steem could ever be more decentralised in this respect than say WordPress.... where all the blogs are stored on thousands if not millions of servers all over the world (depending on who they pay to host).... bit of a tangent, but the thought literally just came into my head 10 minutes ago.

The decentralized factor as I see it is that all information is stored on th chain and as long as one witness holds it, it is there. If for example, wordpress decided to shut up shop, what happens? It is decentralized sure but then what? Decentralization isn't just about fragmentation, it still has to be organizational.

I imagine it a bit like a dropped drinking glass. Sure, it is all still there but it no longer holds water. Decentralization still holds the water.

March timeline for SMT is going to be very difficult after 70% cut in workforce in Steemit unless they prioritize SMT project.

Depends on who was cut doesn't it? Not all of Stinc was developer orientated I would say.

I have no issues with people powering down, this is an economy after all and requires movement of currency. I also don't mind people diversifying, the end goals require it for various reasons. But, you don't have RC issues either, you still get to interact the way you choose here because you ave consistently invested inward while many others have extracted only without recognising the price of interaction, a price that is paid on all other platforms, albeit not as directly nor as visibly.

I can understand the March 19th concerns too, and as said, this is opt-in and out and if it doesn't satisfy needs, the out is always there. It is all about personal options and behaviours taken and there are consequences and risks inherent in all. Those who are powering up like yourself are risking a great deal, those who aren't might be risking their ability to interact at the level they would like.

As for Steemit Inc, I am glad they have finally recognised their limitation and this will hopefully put the entire project on track in a more healthy environment. Perhaps the past suffered from the 'my baby' issue, I don't know.

This just my thoughts about my personal Steem adventure - not sure how others feel and I'm very open minded, so may change my mind..

I would say minds are going to change often here as with each day, new information and possibility comes to light that should change our minds and behaviours to some degree.

Isn't it all more interesting than being fed a service and paying invisible hands though?

Quite Consented That: Freedom Requires Cost Imputs, Which could Be Monetary And Or Labour!!

Can't Get Omelette Baked Without Broken Eggs!! Even In FREETOWN, Sierra Leone ,Africa, There Are No Free Lunch In The Town .Lol!!

The Best Option: Power Up, Invest In Steemit. We Stand To Reap An Avalanche Of Bounty Harvests!!

Invest in Steem and see where it leads. Maybe nowhere, maybe everywhere :)

Quite profound and lucid! Considering things from first principles helps to cut through the miasma of details that obscure understanding, and you have done that very well here.

"Love might be free in this world, everything else carries a price."

LOL

If there is one thing I have learned in my life, it is that free love isn't either. Neither is it close to desirable in my experience. Love, actual continuing commitment to the beneficial care for another, may be the most expensive thing I have. It then, is my most desirable treasure, and there is nothing that could profitably purchase it from me.

Thanks very much!

Considering things from first principles helps to cut through the miasma of details that obscure understanding, and you have done that very well here.

Thank you very much and for the Resteem too.

If there is one thing I have learned in my life, it is that free love isn't either.

Universal love, the one that doesn't require anyone else or anything else :D

It then, is my most desirable treasure, and there is nothing that could profitably purchase it from me.

Love like the possession of a skill, can't be bought.

I really like how you ended this article. One of the foundations of economics is the division of labor. In essence the division of labor is the principle that an economy becomes more efficient as people specialize their skills, and that's exactly what we need to do on Steem. Bloggers don't need to be coders and coders don't need to be bloggers.

Posted using Partiko Android

Division of labour and common goal would help, it is hard in a decentralized community for people to agree on anything.

it's a co-op for independence. We either give money to ourselves or gate, bezo, zucker, page, etc

I agree but many people don't have an understanding of co-ops without thinking it having some socialist type of leaning.

This is still an experiment and things could change in order to ensure that the ecosystem becomes sustainable so shifts in how to “pay” or cover costs may need to be added. However, the strength of the community and the access to a censorship resistant experience as well as communities that build rewarding experiences (both financial and non financial) will make it more worth while than any centralized platform out there.

Posted using Partiko iOS

Things will continually change I hope, it keeps things interesting and innovating :)

Humans are the only species that pay to live on Earth!

There are a few who live off the land completely, but most wouldn't want to live that way as there is no internet connection :)

offgrid connection is fairly possible with better wifi signal
kinda like organic GPS :D
water is best soc. med. yet

What's Being Communicated Here ?@trayan

energy transmissions

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.25
TRX 0.11
JST 0.032
BTC 62432.37
ETH 3003.22
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.78