The Physics of Space and Time.
Imagine how time flies……
On the 20th of August, 1977, NASA launched the first and only spacecraft to have visited the two “ice giants” planets Uranus and Neptune. The spacecraft was named “The Voyager 2” and it was set into motion 16 days before “The Voyager 1”. Its expedition was to explore each of the outer planets and take real life photograph and other calculations. It took the spacecraft 12 years to get to Neptune which was its final destination in the Solar System. It has now been voyaging in the direction of a star called Sirius, leaving the Solar System at a speed of 10km/s. Sirius is a relatively near star, about 8.6 light years away. It is estimated that Voyager 2 should be near the star on a journey lasting 300 000 years.My idea of writing this post
This post is meant to serve three purposes. The first of which is to make it a sequel to my last post on moving through space and time and the second is to try as much as possible to answer @mike961’s question on the ambiguity of time travel as best as I can, although some discussions would come before then. The third purpose is to explain the early 20th-century revolution in our understanding of space, time and movement caused by that famous “Old man” Albert Einstein. Using just two uncomplicated ideas, Einstein was able to prove that time and distance are somehow connected to one another. This led to simple deductions that seemed to be inconceivable paradoxes. No massive object can move faster than light. Time for a moving body passes more slowly than for one that’s not or at rest. And it is practically unattainable to say which one is at rest. Moving objects appear smaller. Energy and mass are comparable using the relation E = mc2. Light rays are distorted by gravity. Time elapses more slowly near a gravitational mass than in emptier space. Etc. We will have to cogitate hard to effectively deal with all this. Certainly, we will encounter the concept of a “thought experiment” and also learn about the basic experiments that strengthen this still bizarre view of the Universe. Those experiments are none other than the Michelson-Morley experiment, and the extra Life of muons. But, in the meantime, let’s try to understand what space and time entail before we go deeper into the discussion.SO, WHAT IS SPACE AND TIME ALL ABOUT?
[My previous post](https://steemit.com/steemstem/@emperorhassy/what-does-moving-through-space-and-time-mean) explains the tight relationship that occurs in modern physics between distance and time, and we could observe that the most important connection is the speed of light, c. We measure distance in the unit of the metre. And, even the metre itself is established on the distance light travels in a unit of time. I’ll like to write more on this fundamental relationship.The two principal ideas
Einstein’s special theory of relativity was built using two basic ideas otherwise known as “Postulates”. They are: • The speed of light is constant • The laws of physics are similar for any two different systems (e.g aeroplane, laboratories) that move or change their position relative to each other at a constant speed. Although, the first postulate is difficult to stomach it’s still relatively easy to comprehend and work with, while the second is more delicate and difficult to analyze or even describe. But, don’t be fazed, more “light” is coming on it later.What is the idea behind the Speed of Light?
The common idea that the speed of light (in a vacuum) is a constant for all observers seems unreasonable. It says that no matter how fast you travel, light still blazes away from you or maybe towards you and it’s at the same speed of 2.997 924 58 x 108 m/s. If you are a fast rider, you can drive faster and catch up with the driver at your front. But notwithstanding how fast you race your spacecraft, you can never even reach the light wave in front. Light defies the normal laws of relative Motion. So, this was what led Einstein to name his theory a “principle of relativity”.A QUICK HISTORY OF TIME
The concept of time appears to be very elemental to Einstein’s relativity. So, I will start by reminding us of some characteristics of time and its measurement that we probably fail to appreciate.Time and Clocks
Clocks perform basically two functions. They are useful in telling us the time of the day and also for describing a time interval. In the early 17th century, an idea surfaced, shortly after the automatic clocks were made better and widely accessible. The idea was that the clocks should be used to measured things that flowed steadily, as described by Isaac Newton thus and I quote: >Absolute, true and mathematical time, of itself, and from its own nature, flows equably without relation to anything external. Newton had defined a kind of clockless time. But it doesn’t work. Then whose time is it? A muon is a very small particle of matter created in a place that witnessed an energetic collision, for example, a collision in a particle accelerator. A muon can also be caused by cosmic rays. It is a very fast but highly unstable particle, having a half-life of about a millionth of a second. But when particle physicists study muons, they found out that their lifetime is longer. So, the external observer and the high-speed muon seem to encounter time at a different pace.Setting a Clock
A Clock is anything that can be used to determine time. Traditional clocks are usually made of a pendulum or a vibrating quartz crystal. But, when we are considering the measurement of very long times like the Earth, then the half-lives of radioactive substances can be used. The half-life of a beam of muons can also report the time. The radioactive material and the beam of muons are sorts of clocks. But how can we actually compare clocks?MOVING CLOCKS AND MOVING FRAMES OF REFERENCE
Before I proceed, have a quick reminder of relativity and frame of reference from my previous [post](https://steemit.com/steemstem/@emperorhassy/what-does-moving-through-space-and-time-mean). In a nutshell, a reference frame can be as simple as just you, your room and your measuring instruments. About four hundred years ago, Galileo realized that he could not show beyond doubt whether the Earth was moving or standing still by merely making measurements of objects traveling about on Earth. The example he used was that of a goldfish bowl in a ship’s cabin. The fish moved about the container in exactly the same way whether the ship is sailing or not (so far the ship is sailing at a constant speed on still water). The movement or direction of the goldfish or water in the bowl can’t give you a clue about the movement of the ship. To know the direction of the ship, you would be compelled to look out through the porthole at the shore and then have to imagine that it is the ship and not the shore that is really moving. Imagine you are lying on a bed and drop your book on to it at a distance of a few centimetres. It should fall directly on where you let it go. Exactly the same would happen if you were sitting or reclining in an aircraft moving at a steady speed where you and the cabin are the reference frame. But from a reference frame outside yours, dropping the book would be seen as moving sideways as well as falling down. The movement of the aircraft is attaching a sideways motion to the book. This is simply in accordance with the laws of mechanics which implies that “speeds do add up”.Why does light not behave like pens or any other form of matter?
The unusual fact that sprang up towards the end of the 19th century was that light does not behave like falling pens, with a distinguished movement that’s different in a manner corresponding to the frame of reference. Neither does it behaves as bullets shot from a moving gun. For instance, if a gun is shot while coming in the direction of a stationary target. The bullets travel faster to the target than if both the gun and target are stationary. This conforms to the ideas of Galileo and Newton, that any object in a moving reference frame has the speed of the reference frame of the gun’s bullets in addition to any extra speed of its own. Some researchers thought that light would act like objects and gain extra speed when the light source and the observer were moving towards one another kind of. But in spite of very meticulous and painstaking measurements, the experiments all showed otherwise. Albert Michelson and Edward Morley actually conducted an experiment on the behavior of light but they both arrived at a null result; a type of result that refutes the starting assumption. The consequence of that null result is as follows: If you are traveling in a spacecraft at half the speed of light and projects a light beam ahead of you, you would quantify the speed of the light as c, as you would expect. But c would also be the speed calculated by any other observer traveling at any other constant speed relative to your rocket. Compare this with tossing a pen towards the front in a train.For the pens: pen speed, vp plus train speed, vt , equals (vp + vt)
And for the light: light speed, c, plus spacecraft speed, 0.5c, equals c
This is illustrated in the figure below.Thanks for reading.
![]()REFERENCES
1. [What is the difference between moving through space and moving?](https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-difference-between-moving-through-space-and-moving-through-time&ved=2ahUKEwjM0KH_tLvhAhVBDGMBHdIPC-UQFjABegQIDhAE&usg=AOvVaw1PDswl12OrIycfMV68xQL7) 2. [What Does Moving Through Space-time Mean?](https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://futurism.com/what-does-moving-through-space-time-mean-2&ved=2ahUKEwjM0KH_tLvhAhVBDGMBHdIPC-UQFjAKegQIAhAB&usg=AOvVaw0ypMUY0imL4123X_8sumYx) 3. [Relativity abyss.uoregon.edu › lectures › lec06](https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://abyss.uoregon.edu/~js/cosmo/lectures/lec06.html&ved=2ahUKEwjM0KH_tLvhAhVBDGMBHdIPC-UQFjAMegQIAxAB&usg=AOvVaw3eFjfEXZAAKpojeVRd7Qzq) 4. [Einstein's Theory of General Relativity](https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.space.com/amp/17661-theory-general-relativity.html&ved=2ahUKEwjq8IPYtbvhAhXkD2MBHRQtDpQQFjAfegQIBRAB&usg=AOvVaw06gNpC6UWI-sEmUKdPkPKO&cf=1) 5. [Theoretical physics: The origins of space and time](https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.nature.com/news/theoretical-physics-the-origins-of-space-and-time-1.13613&ved=2ahUKEwjq8IPYtbvhAhXkD2MBHRQtDpQQFjAbegQIBxAB&usg=AOvVaw3VUeH3Xckw_IBEtIoSD5eL) 6. [Time in physics](https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_in_physics&ved=2ahUKEwjq8IPYtbvhAhXkD2MBHRQtDpQQFjAaegQICBAB&usg=AOvVaw2WALCYREv_zBu4rtmdl9wv) 7. [Spacetime](https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spacetime&ved=2ahUKEwjq8IPYtbvhAhXkD2MBHRQtDpQQFjAZegQICRAB&usg=AOvVaw19ATeMpGo4ApuBTbw6IWEj) 8. [Space-Time - Special and General Relativity](https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.physicsoftheuniverse.com/topics_relativity_spacetime.html&ved=2ahUKEwjq8IPYtbvhAhXkD2MBHRQtDpQQFjAQegQIAxAB&usg=AOvVaw1DB7piTifIuywcE2HOhnqR) 9. [Space-time physics](http://www.eftaylor.com/spacetimephysics/) 10. [The Voyager 2](https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voyager_2&ved=2ahUKEwi2wt3P7cPhAhU05eAKHSaHCsEQmhMwDHoECAoQLg&usg=AOvVaw3LsN79kMMPuj9TtGblj7La) 11. [Newton's Principia (1846).djvu/83 - Wikisource](https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Page:Newton%2527s_Principia_(1846).djvu/83&ved=2ahUKEwjqtOGW78PhAhVsBGMBHZKOCQsQFjABegQIDhAF&usg=AOvVaw2_bN1clXmPWoI01o1PxR7-) 12. [Michelson–Morley experiment - Wikipedia](https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelson%25E2%2580%2593Morley_experiment&ved=2ahUKEwiew6OR8cPhAhWoBWMBHfZ5C6YQFjACegQIDBAO&usg=AOvVaw3CGsscGiw4TsEMbnALO95e) 13. [Twin paradox - Wikipedia](https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twin_paradox&ved=2ahUKEwjAnMTr8cPhAhWO1uAKHcPNArAQFjAOegQICBAu&usg=AOvVaw1IKO9plnO8Ns272exGojTW) 14. Collins Advanced Physics by Ken Dobson, David Grace and David Lovett pg 459 ![]()Make sure to follow steemstem on steemstem.io, steemit, facebook, twitter, and instagram to always be up-to-date on our latest news and ideas.
Please also consider to support the project by delegating to @steemstem for a ROI of 65% of our curation rewards (quick delegation links: 50SP | 100SP | 500SP | 1000SP | 5000SP | 10000SP).
Follow us || Vote for the SteemSTEM Witness || Visit our new home steemstem.io
![]()
When you notice how massive and far some of the stars are with respect to the earth, the massiveness of our world pales in comparison. Interesting article, now it becomes easier to assimilate why the accuracy of the atomic clocks are needed in the GPS.
Yes, u're right.
I'm very glad you found the article interesting.
Thanks, for coming by.
You are welcome
This post has been voted on by the SteemSTEM curation team and voting trail. It is elligible for support from @curie and @utopian-io.
If you appreciate the work we are doing, then consider supporting our witness stem.witness. Additional witness support to the curie witness and utopian-io witness would be appreciated as well.
For additional information please join us on the SteemSTEM discord and to get to know the rest of the community!
Thanks for having added @steemstem as a beneficiary to your post. This granted you a stronger support from SteemSTEM.
Thanks for having used the steemstem.io app. You got a stronger support!
Wow, I never thought that my question would inspire you to write an article, thanks for answering it even further and in such an easy to understand way!
This could be the beginning of an interesting series, even! The relation and interactions between time, space and gravity can be very interesting, as anyone who has watched Interstellar (one of my favorite movies) knows.
Posted using Partiko Android
Hello, Dr. Mike. Yes, your question really did inspire me. I'm even more inspired to write a few more series on the subject matter including the behavior of light, time dilation and length contraction.
Thanks, @mike961 for passing by to reading the post and giving a nice feedback. I've also given you a follow and promised to read your posts. I'm sure they would be an interesting read.
Great idea, specially now that the subject has gained a lot of popularity due to the photos of the Messier 87 black hole.
And thanks for the follow, hope you enjoy my content! I'm not being able to post as often as I would like due to recent events in my country (Venezuela; nation wide blackouts that can last for several days, lack of internet when there's power, etc), but I expect to have some free time next week, let's just hope that I also have power and internet connection.
Posted using Partiko Android
Hi @emperorhassy!
Your post was upvoted by Utopian.io in cooperation with @steemstem - supporting knowledge, innovation and technological advancement on the Steem Blockchain.
Contribute to Open Source with utopian.io
Learn how to contribute on our website and join the new open source economy.
Want to chat? Join the Utopian Community on Discord https://discord.gg/h52nFrV
It was a really very informative post for me...
I liked it a lot! :)
Hello @crazy-facts, I'm glad you found the post lovely and informative. Thanks, for coming by.