Earth Impact! How To Deflect A Doomsday Asteroid With An A-BombsteemCreated with Sketch.


NASA/JPL link Public domain image.

The year is 2035 and a Near Earth Object (NEO) search team discovers an asteroid that appears to be on a collision course with Earth.

There is no panic at first because the uncertainty in the asteroid's position is large and the asteroid's impact ellipsis is also very large and only a small part of that ellipsis intersects with the Earth.

As the days and weeks go by the uncertainty in the asteroid's emphemeris parameters is steadily reduced and shockingly as the intersection ellipsis with the Earth gets smaller it also moves more on target with the Earth.

Eventually the entire intersection ellipsis covers the Earth. An impact from this object is 100% guaranteed.

The asteroid is 1600 metres in diameter (1 mile) and is estimated to be made of porous rock and so will have a density of about 1500 kg/m3. Calculations show that it will hit the Earth at about 30 km/s.

The impact will be in the ocean about 40 km off of the eastern seaboard of the United States and about 200 km from Washington DC. The resultant crater is calculated to be about 18 km in diameter (11 miles).

The energy of impact will be equivalent to 350,000 megatons of TNT which is far more power than the world's combined nuclear arsenal.

The impact will create an earthquake of magnitude 8.1 in Washington and exposed people will suffer 3rd degree burns and their clothing will catch fire and the surrounding forests will all ignite.

The impact will hit a spot with a 500 metre water depth and the resultant tsunami is expected to be about 500 ft high.

No bueno.


PxHere.com link CC0 license

So How Do We Deflect This Sucker?

The asteroid is made up of porous rock so simply hitting it with nuclear weapons will likely just cause it to break up and turn it from a bullet into a shotgun blast. The impact damage will not be averted, it will only be spread out over a much wider area.

So, the way to do this might be to explode the weapon just off to the side of the asteroid.

Imagine a ping pong ball in the palm of your hand. Purse your lips and hit it with a puff of air. The ping pong ball will go flying off in the opposite direction away from you.

This is the idea behind a stand-off nuclear explosion and it goes as follows.

You send a nuclear weapon strapped to some sacrificial mass and park it off the side of the asteroid some distance away. Detonate the weapon and both the weapon and the sacrificial mass are vapourized.

The rapidly expanding shell of gas will hit the asteroid and deflect it. If you tune your parameters right, and there are several, you can both deflect the asteroid and be gentle enough to not break it up.


Public Domain Pictures.net
slightly modified by Procrastilearner
link CC0 license

The Tuneable Parameters

1. Weapon Yield

Weapon yield is the obvious first parameter you want to get right. Too little and the asteroid won't deflect much. Too much yield and you run the risk of splitting up the object.

2. Distance

The distance that you park your weapon from the asteroid is the second tuneable parameter. Too close and you risk breaking up the object, too far away you run the risk of not deflecting it very much at all.

3. Sacrificial Mass

The puff of gas that will deflect the asteroid will come mostly from the vapourized mass that the weapon is strapped to. Too much mass might mean that the gas will expand out too slowly, too little mass will mean that the gas will not have enough total momentum to deflect the asteroid.

If you tune your parameters right then you will get the result you want. A firm but gentle push against the entire surface of the asteroid that is facing the weapon as well as the much needed deflection.


SpaceX link Public domain image.

Launch and Timing Issues

There might be issues with getting the weapon to the asteroid in time. Hopefully the asteroid will need to make a few orbits of the Sun before its path intersects with the Earth's and time will be plentiful.

However if it is not then a multi-rocket, multi-launch strategy might be needed. For the first launch you send the weapon and its guidance rocket into Low Earth Orbit. A second launch will send a large tank of fuel into Low Earth Orbit that will dock with the weapon and provide the fuel for all of the delta-v that you will ever need.

There is simply no time for a low-energy Hohmann transfer orbit for this job, we want to get there in the quickest straightest path possible. Since the fate of the Earth is at risk money is also no object so you would want to send a bunch of these weapons separated by a day or two from each other.

The earlier you can get to the asteroid the better. A small deflection very early on will generate a large deflection distance by the time it reaches the Earth in a few years.

If the time to impact is short (a few months) then the problem becomes exponentially more difficult.

Closing Words

The day may come when humanity is faced with the issue of deflecting an object in space. Nuclear weapons have been proposed and criticized because of the threat of just breaking the object up into a million pieces.

The idea of detonating a weapon just off to the side and hitting it with a more "gentle" expanding sphere of gas just might be the answer to this tricky problem.

Thank you for reading my post.

Post Sources

[1] Near Earth Object Search.
[2] Impact Earth! impact calculator.
[3] How destructive is the Earth's nuclear arsenal?
[4] Hohmann transfer orbit.

Sort:  

.

The gravity tractor idea is a good one but you need a lot of time for the deflection to amount to anything.

If time is short then more "assertive" methods would probably need to be used.

.

But bombs are fun.

Am I on a list now?

Will I be banned from flying? Shit.

It sounds a bit like a bad sci-fi movie ;)

But I like bad sci-fi movies.

I have read a couple of articles on this topic, and there is something I don't understand. If the asteroid was broken up into lots of small pieces, wouldn't that lessen the damage a lot? More surface area to burn off in the atmosphere and the energy of the impact would be spread over a wider area of ocean. I guess it depends a lot on how many pieces, several big chunks or a very large shower of gravel. My physics is pretty weak, so feel free to tear my reasoning to shreds!

Those are good points.

I think the worry though would be that 10 or 20 smaller pieces would be an uncontrolled situation so who know what would happen?

The smaller pieces might break up and some of them would disintegrate. The total energy hitting the atmosphere/Earth would still be the same and there would still be a lot of, now widespread, environmental damage.

I guess it would be best to try to deflect the entire thing, intact, and get it to miss the Earth. If that fails then smash it up.

I would not want to be the one who would have to make that decision.

I dunno... the way things are going, maybe we should just let the friggin thing hit. I mean, it can't do much more damage than we have already set in motion and, besides, I think I'd like to go out fast, in a brilliant blast of color and light. Not the slow choking of fouled air, the pain of starvation and thirst for clean water.

Not trying to be a downer or anything. Just sayin'.

I hear ya. Thanks for the honest opinion. I get in those moods as well but overall I am more of an optimistic type and think that we will muddle through.

I hope that steroid weakens and disintegrates ... Although they have thought of lots of solutions is scary!

@therealwolf 's created platform smartsteem scammed my post this morning (mothersday) that was supposed to be for an Abused Childrens Charity. Dude literally stole from abused children that don't have mothers ... on mothersday.

https://steemit.com/steemit/@prometheusrisen/beware-of-smartsteem-scam

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.30
TRX 0.11
JST 0.033
BTC 64223.84
ETH 3158.34
USDT 1.00
SBD 4.29