How Clean is "Green Energy?"

in #stemng6 years ago (edited)

Today, the energy needs of the world keep rising. The energy consumption is at an all-time high- the world is an Oliver and it is continually asking for more. As cliche as it sounds, the above is true. Environmental activists have not ceased informing the world of the need for a clean energy. Alternatives such as the renewable energy such as solar are often mentioned in the category of clean energy. Nuclear power, too, possesses the ability to remove 64 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide plus prevent deaths of up to 1.84 million people as a result of pollution-related mortalities which is an outcome of the overdependence on fossil fuel between the year 1971 to 2009.


[image credits: Pixabay Commons]

The global climate change is a hot topic of discussion in the annual meetings of the United Nations Climate Change conference from 1995 to date to discuss a better way to reduce the drastic effect of pollution to our environment.

Let's take a look at the renewable energy which involves the battery. There is a 90% chance you are reading this article/story in a battery powered device. If you can shell out between $68,000 to $138,000 you may be a proud owner of a Tesla car and may probably pat yourself on the back to contributing to less pollution to the world. You may also have a laptop or phone with big size battery that can last for hours; which is good as it saves on the electric bill and in other words help save the world from pollution from fossil-generated electricity.

Those are all good ways of leaving less carbon footprint to save the environment but lithium-ion batteries are made from Cobalt, a mineral mined from the earth's crust and even under the seafloor below the earth's crust. Cobalt, the sometimes underrated metal, has a lot of uses. Up to 42% of this use is in batteries, with the rest of it as alloys, tool materials, catalysts, colour pigments in paints, magnets, soaps, etc.

The world's major supplier of cobalt is the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). The Central African country accounts for 50% of the world's cobalt supply. Most of the miners dig the ground armed with shovels and hammer. The people are poor and slave every day to extract cobalt from mines poorly managed by mine owners whose only concern is the cobalt and the price it will fetch in the international market. The risk of cave-ins or contracting serious diseases from the fumes inhaled daily is taken as part of the everyday hustle to survive by the poor miners.

The Center for Disease Control in the U.S has also stated the increased health risk involved in cobalt mining to the lungs especially through inhalation of the cobalt-rich dust and fumes which is common to the workers in the DRC who are as poor equipped as their health protection gear which is nonexistent.

The lung diseases such as the "hard metal lung disease", a disease which occurs due to long-term exposure o particles of metal such as carbide, cobalt are diseases commonly found amongst cobalt miners/residents living within the mines in the DRC according to this research.

Even if we are to forget the health implication of the mining community, there is an Amnesty report, "THIS IS WHAT WE DIE FOR", that examines the use of child labour, which is almost reminiscent of the 2006 movie, The Blood Diamond which follows the human right abuses and how diamonds finances guerilla warfare in the Siera Leone Civil War of 1992-2002.


[image credits: Wikipedia Commons]

Unscrupulous mine operators engage services of children who they easily exploit. They work for them for long hours in exchange for peanuts. Due to the level of hardship in the area, these children born to poor parents may never know they are exploited. They just get used to waking up early in the morning and working till night in the mines to earn less than $2 or less for their struggles.

Just like many jewellers did not do business or pay for "blood" diamonds (or diamonds gotten from conflict zone, use of slave labour, etc) through the use of the Kimberley Process, the US tech giant, Apple, recently announced that it will no longer buy cobalt gotten via manual hand mining.

The environment feels the toll of all these mining activities. The byproducts of mining (waste) pollute drinking water and the rivers with disastrous effect on the host community. The story is similar to the oil spills in the Niger-Delta area in Nigeria due to oil exploration activities with an increased infant mortality, and birth defects to newborn registered.

The toll of the cobalt mining industry on health and the environment.

Moving on from the cobalt, a constituent of the lithium battery, we enter the field of photovoltaic (PV) panels. We already know the world in the bid to reduce dependency on fossil fuel and reduce pollution, now tries to harvest a percentage of the gazillion watts, about 3.86 x 1026 watts of energy produced daily by the Sun.

Solar power is one of the sources of energy deemed to be extremely clean. An estimate puts the number of tonnes of greenhouse gases a 3KW solar system takes off annually from the earth to about 2.5 tonnes.

But producing the solar panels are not as green as many may think. One of China's main manufacturer of solar panels, Jinko Solar with a 9.81-gigawatt shipment of solar panels got entangled on a lawsuit over pollution in China's Zhejiang province where waste product disposed of in rivers poisoned it and killed their fishes. The villagers did protest this pollution to their waters and destroyed some of the company's property. The 500 man protest is just one in a series of another backlash from host communities where solar products are manufactured in China.

While much green energy enthusiast, myself included :), is keen on getting solar panels that will be more efficient, only a few show interest in recycling solar panels/. Part of the problem may be the long lifespan of solar panels- between 15 to 25 years.


[image credits: Wikipedia Commons]

The United States, for instance, have an estimated installed solar power of about 10.6 GW as at 2017. That means in the next 30 years we will have about 35.3 million solar panels that have reached their expiration date. Part of the problem of recycling may be due to the complex nature of it as each component of the solar panels will have to be separated. The metal part contains different metals such as copper, lead, cadmium, gallium, aluminium frames, silicon wafers used in the production of solar cells plus the encapsulating synthetic silicon material.

Even though the renewable energy may not be as green as many hoped; I think many are never bothered about this, because how then can you make an omelette without breaking the eggs?

We are made to choose the lesser evil and the renewables stand very much stands tall amongst the other giants- energy-generating process.


References


If you write STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) related posts, consider joining #steemSTEM on discord here. If from Nigeria, there may be need to include the #stemng tag in your post. You can visit this blog by @stemng for more details. You can also check this blog post by @steemstem here and this guidelines here for help on how to be a member of @steemstem. Please also check this blog post from @steemstem on proper use of images devoid of copyright issues here

Would you like to delegate to the @steemstem? Here is a link below

50 SP | 100SP | 500SP | 1,000SP | 5,000SP | 10,000SP | 50,000SP

Sort:  

I don't really think having a big battery allows you to save energy? The device still consumes the same amount, but you can carry of lot of charge with you which eventually has to be replenished. But ok that's a minor detail ;)

The impact of manufacturing costs indeed can not be ignored. I once read an article about electric cars leaving a larger impact on the environment than a regular car with combustion engine. Even a tesla, when using only green energy still has a larger ecological footprint thanks to production costs. (smaller e-cars tend to be better after all)
Let me see if I can find that article:
https://www.ft.com/content/a22ff86e-ba37-11e7-9bfb-4a9c83ffa852
This is the article from the Financial Times. I have written a summary about the study a while back in case this article wouldn't be available any more.

We can keep arguing about the production costs of various production methods like the solar panels or wind turbines, but overall I believe it is always a better option than burning fossil fuels and I really liked the sentence "how then can you make an omelette without breaking the eggs?" That really sums it up nicely :D

Finally I think it will eventually come down to the point that we need to be aware of electricity as a precious resource. We don't leave our faucets open because we are too lazy, so why do we do exactly that with our electricity? I think we waste a lot of electricity and in stead of pushing for those extra Kilowatts green energy maybe we can put some effort in reducing some extra Kilowatts in consumption?

Interesting post. Some similar points I brought up (as a nano-/picoplankon) in a post a few weeks back. Nevertheless, externalities need to be taken into consideration.

What are the costs of the mining for the solar panel and battery components? What are the costs of disposing of the solar panels or batteries, or to recycle these components? All of this needs to be taken into account when determining just how much things really cost (both in terms of $ and the environment and the workers that do the work to make this energy possible). Interesting post.

I also wonder about as a community if @steemstem we should be thinking about doing an internal literature review here order to use the blockchain to reference and cross-reference "first in" on ideas posted on this blockchain, etc. I may follow up with a post on this. Thanks!

Ah yes! I do recall that article. I believe posting about similar topics is inevitable but I might have some ideas to work with that. It sounds like an interesting concept and I'll make sure to check out your post about it to join the discussion there ;)

Here is a link to the post I just published. Enjoy...

With the caveat that of course there is going to be repetition. There are really no hard and fast rules here...

I agree with you on all you've said. I guess the power used in charging up big batteries still accounts for same as the one used in running the device. It only saves you energy in that the sun/electric supply is not always there-you can save for use later. I always say it is better to conserve energy than to produce it. In my country, only those that use electricity on prepaid meters tend to conserve it. People on postpaid where a fixed amount of bill comes per month tend to leave their light bulbs on during the day. This is something those on prepaid are very much aware of. In terms of water, we often use water from boreholes, the public pipe-borne water system is something you see being used carelessly, it's not hard to see running faucets and waste of such water. These are things we should put into consideration to reduce the energy dissipated in making the utility work.

This is an important article, and we really are trapped in so many other aspects. For example, plastic bags are actually far greener in their production than reusable bags. The ecological toll it takes to make reusable bags means that you have to use it between 170 to several thousands of times just to offset the damage to the environment compared to single-use plastics.

There's a new angle, spin and problem in every feature of green energy we're putting out there... it's tough.

In the case of the reusable bag production, it is an apparent example of taking one step forward and two steps backwards. I've been of the view that reusable plastic is better than the disposal counterpart on its impact on the environment.

Green energy is just an alternative to the other kind. Im sure there are people working currently on the pollution . As for the workers that are being underpaid and working their ass off, the goverment is to blame for this.

Imagine the oil spill that happened some days agao in Nigeria. The accident was fatal and cost some lives. The same thing also happened again days after because the goverment sucks and all they care about is embezzlement.

Thank you for your insightful input.

Hi @greenrun

That was an amazing write up, a well precised information on green energy . Though you didn't touch some parts of green energy.

But then, I want ask a question as regards to the statement below .

Unscrupulous mine operators engage services of children who they easily exploit. They work for them for long hours in exchange for peanuts. Due to the level of hardship in the area, these children born to poor parents may never know they are exploited. They just get used to waking up early in the morning and working till night in the mines to earn less than $2 or less for their struggles.

what do you think can be done to curb this?

By following Apple's method of not purchasing cobalt mined by hand. If there's no demand, supply dies off.

Sadly, it really is about choosing the lesser evil, green energy might not be exactly what it is cracked up to be but it still is a significant step in saving the earth and till all the kinks are worked out, we have to make do with what we've got...another great article from @greenrun

I agree, it is still a better alternative giving the features of the other options.

Most of the miners dig the ground armed with shovels and hammer. The people are poor and slave every day to extract cobalt from mines poorly managed by mine owners whose only concern is the cobalt and the price it will fetch in the international market.

I saw a coverage of this stuff on CNN a while back and it was so sad.

In the end, not all that glitters is truly gold

Indeed, just looking at the other side of the coin.

Hello @greenrun

One of my favorite niche.

Even though the renewable energy may not be as green as many hoped; I think many are never bothered about this, because how then can you make an omelette without breaking the eggs?

To me personally, renewable energy, even though it seems to be more healthier and a niece idea, not gonna be an easy task.

Regards

@eurogee of @euronation and @steemstem communities

Thanks for taking out time to be here.

So green energy refers on how to reduce the use of our daily energy consumption. Based on what you write above, it includes the use of solar panels. But there are also other way to minimize energy like using windmill, steam energy and etc. . I hope someday our world would become cleaner and greener.

Yes, there are other types of green energy which I didn't mention in the post; a windmill is one of them.

Interesting read green, to know that our "give us green energy" placards may not be so much as green as we thought, at least not in the ways we produce or get the materials. All the same, you're correct, we did choose the lesser evil, and in a way, that makes us less hideous, I hope. -pangoli.

BTW, wavy 🌊.

That was an awesome comment. We always go for the lesser evil.

That was an awesome
Comment. We always go for
The lesser evil.

                 - greenrun


I'm a bot. I detect haiku.

Hi boss

Not only solar panel sir, there is hardly any source of green energy where the energy is easily manufactured. Honestly, I think this green energy thing may still be very far off reach against what the majority thinks.

Nice composition.

@sciencetech from @stemng / @steemstem

That's the fact bro. People just have to chose from the basic energy source or the lesser evil which is green energy

You are right, I'm still a major supporter of going green, the other alternative is more harmful to the environment and the people.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.24
TRX 0.11
JST 0.032
BTC 61572.53
ETH 2995.53
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.73