The Cost of the 'War on Terror': 500,000+ Killed and Climbing

in #war5 years ago (edited)

The Cost of War Project reports the death toll from the "War on Terror" is at about half a million people. This estimate is based on people killed in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan alone during the past 17 years of the U.S. effort to chase around ""terrorists".


Shock and Awe Bombing of Iraq - Source

Those unfamiliar with the reality of the global war on terror might think these are "terrorists" being killed by the honorable U.S. armed forces and their allies. But most are innocent collateral damage of a global invasion force that is wreaking havoc and spreading destruction and chaos where ever it goes. Neta C. Crawford, co-director from the Costs of War Project at Brown University's Watson Institute says:

One might also think that the cost of this "war" are justified, and that things are getting better. But according to co-director of the project, Stephanie Savell:

"This new body count signals that, far from diminishing, the war is only intensifying."

The report estimates that wars initiated by the U.S. post-9/11 have resulted in the killing of 480,000 and 507,000 people. Again, that's just for Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan. It doesn't account for the 500,000 dead from the ongoing conflict the U.S. has joined in Syria, nor Libya, or other locations where the hunt for terrorists and "evil-doers" has led Western powers to attack. It also doesn't include indirect deaths or those killed by the impact of a war, such as for limited food, water, shelter, electricity, hospitals or sanitation.

The half million killed that make up the report come from "direct deaths". These are from the "U.S. military, contractors, and DoD employees; national military and police as well as other allied troops; opposition fighters; civilians; journalists; and aid workers". Iraq has the largest number, making up nearly 300,000 of the total. And over 200,000 of them are civilians who've been killed in this perpetual war that masquerades in the name of "freedom".


Source

This is a stark contrast to the U.S. military deaths at about 4,550 for invading Iraq. People want to celebrate the military "heroes", and morn their loss, while they are experiencing a 2% loss for attacking and invading countries and killing others. Meanwhile those that are killed in the "war on terror" and attempt to "liberate" the people of those countries suffer 45 times more losses, and they are just civilians. So much for the "fight for freedom" of the people in those lands.

The Cost of War Project launched in 2011, and provides a contrast to the often underreported costs of waging war given by the U.S. government. Co-director Savell thinks the Democrat-win of the House of representatives in the past midterm elections will result in "House Democrats will try to advance a national security strategy emphasizing restraint and accountability for the costs of the War on Terror." Whether that is true or not, remains to be seen. It may just be political bias, as nothing really changed during the previous Democrat rule of the U.S. forces under President Obama.

Reporting civilian deaths may help to put pressure on the government to reevaluate it's actions though, as the U.S.s supported war on Yemen being covered int he media seems to have brought pressure to call on the Saudis to ceasefire. Savell said:

"Research shows that governments become more careful when civilian deaths from "collateral damage" are reported on. A wave of Democrats now in control of the House plan to push for just that. Representative Ro Khannasays he wants to hold as many as three days of hearings with Trump's national security team to "justify, for the American people, what our mission is, what the costs are, what the risks are, and why we're there." Representative Adam Smith, poised to become chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, plans to increase oversight of the military, and others led by Representative Barbara Lee hope to end the war in Afghanistan."

Whether the Democrats actually bring more accountability or not, informing people of the costs of war and the human destruction involved is important to put pressure in any political sphere of influence. The consequences of this seemingly endless war int he MIddle East needs to be understood if changes in U.S. foreign policy are to happen. Co-director Neta C. Crawford, also a Boston University political science professor, said:

"Too often, legislators, NGOs, and the news media that try to track the consequences of the wars are inhibited by governments determined to paint a rosy picture of perfect execution and progress."

To end an endless war, the public needs to be informed. That's where the political pressure will come from. Lawmakers will listen when people demand a change.

Day by day, the casualties grow, largely unnoticed by the American public and our lawmakers. This is why we need to #EndEndlessWar.


Source

As previously mentioned with the toll on Iraq and Iraqis outweighing the loss of American military who create the whole mess, the Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif also mentioned the drastic difference in suffering. He tweeted:

US' so-called 'War on Terror' has cost 500K+ lives. 110K+ dead just since 2016. Debacle has caused destruction in Iraq, Syria, Libya & Yemen. It has spawned ISIS & multiple Al Qaeda affiliates. Cost to US taxpayers: 7K dead Americans + $5.6 trillion. Cost to MidEast: Unfathomable


Source

While the Americans lament their losses, they ignore the grave injustice that they force upon others in their ignorant quest for "freedom". The raging wars oversees may delude Americans into feeling safe and secure, but that comes with a high cost in debt to themselves, and a higher cost to the nations and people they invade to attack and kill. As the report said, these are only the "direct deaths". Millions have died as a result of this global agenda to remake the Middle East.

The Middle East is forever changed in the 21st century. Many think we live in a time of peace because of the relative geographic zones of comfort and bubble of reality they live in. But they don't see the violence they support in other places while they delude themselves. The American Dream has them living in an illusion and false blanket of comfort acting as a veil of reality that masks the truth of their actions.


References:


Thank you for your time and attention. Peace.


If you appreciate and value the content, please consider: Upvoting, Sharing or Reblogging below.
Follow me for more content to come!


My goal is to share knowledge, truth and moral understanding in order to help change the world for the better. If you appreciate and value what I do, please consider supporting me as a Steem Witness by voting for me at the bottom of the Witness page.

Sort:  

I find it ironic that they insinuate the Democrats oppose wars. Many (myself included) felt Hillary was pushing for one with Russia, and Obama wasn't opposed to dropping his fair share of bombs and replacing foreign governments.

It has been many years and forget the source. But I remember reading after Bush Jr invaded Iraq they has placed the death toll from lack of medicine, food and clean water at around half a million from the time his daddy set them up and began bombing them and cutting them off from the necessities. I had thought then that had Saddam had a way to get revenge he would have already. Especially the way daddy Bush set him up with the whole Kuwait thing after he had been such a good puppet for them during the 8 year war with Iran.

It’s amusing that anyone thinks either of the two faux parties, one party in reality, are against war. They scream against it but their votes paint a different picture.

Yeah, it's divide and conquer bullshit. Yes, the indirect death toll is in the millions. And the Kuwait baby killing affair was a good lie to get popular support for Desert Storm.

oh, wars..after the terroristic attack in my city that has happened 3 weeks ago I am too emotinal about this topic.. Losses are always much bigger that it's said officially.. And it seems to me the most bloody war was the WWII.

That sucks. Dangerous people everywhere :/

It’s funny to think that someone can say the Democrats are against war. Clearly they are trying to save face or something because Democrats love war just as much as the next greedy politician.

I think it all depends. Some dems are more for it than others, same with reps, but the general mindset is that reps are more for it. Anything for 'merica though...

If only folks valued human life and loved one another it would be a better world. Sadly it takes a backseat to other agendas. Historically War has been a money maker and a power grabber. Thanks @krnel

Yup, war is big business...

Curated for #informationwar (by @commonlaw)

  • Our purpose is to encourage posts discussing Information War, Propaganda, Disinformation and other false narratives. We currently have over 8,000 Steem Power and 20+ people following the curation trail to support our mission.

  • Join our discord and chat with 200+ fellow Informationwar Activists.

  • Join our brand new reddit! and start sharing your Steemit posts directly to The_IW!

  • Connect with fellow Informationwar writers in our Roll Call! InformationWar - Contributing Writers/Supporters: Roll Call Pt 11

Ways you can help the @informationwar

  • Upvote this comment.
  • Delegate Steem Power. 25 SP 50 SP 100 SP
  • Join the curation trail here.
  • Tutorials on all ways to support us and useful resources here

Thanks for the support.

I support you 100%❤

Terrorist terrorist is just an agenda, to increase power and authority over oil and colonialism.

Posted using Partiko Android

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.29
TRX 0.12
JST 0.033
BTC 63318.34
ETH 3108.17
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.97