Oxymoron - part ox, part moron

in #anarchy6 years ago

america4.jpg

"Taxation is the price we pay for failing to build a civilized society. The higher the tax level, the greater the failure. A centrally planned totalitarian state represents a complete defeat for the civilized world, while a totally voluntary society represents its ultimate success." Mark Skousen

Socialism is a mandatory ingredient of statism and democracy. The state cannot survive unless it can determine the winners and losers and make believe that the slaves are free. Anyone who understands the nature of the state cannot even tolerate the tiniest version of it as morally acceptable.

Statists are completely submerged by paradoxes and AnComs can be the worst kind of delusional statists, threatening violence to voluntaryists.

It is quite hard for me to understand how such an intelligent person could still advocate the initiation of violence that is the nature of the state and not be aware of it.

Can the fear of rejection by your peers be a sufficient motive?

There is no excuse!

In academia, for example, you cannot be an anarchist without losing your job... so... fuck the academia!
You certainly can be a communist, which is just pure atrocity. Skinheads advocate less murderous ideology. I do not see many scholars being skinheads, do you?

We have all human knowledge at a click. As if silly title made you smarter anyway? Who needs these official confirmations of one's intelligence? Why would anyone care if you are a professor, if you are still a dumb moron?

The "caring" government that promises to hold your hand as you cross the street refuses to let you go on the other side without asking for permission in the first place.

Those who cannot survive without theft do not deserve to survive. The end.

Disassociate yourself from these people, until violent retards will have to either change their ways, become completely self-sufficient or starve.

There is no excuse for advocating aggression.

It isn't me stating this obvious fact. It is the evolutionary impulse.

You are on path to extinction if these are your values. This is hardly debatable.

Voluntaryism is the manifestation of human awareness awakening to the next level of our experience. Retards trying to stop the improvement or melting down the entropy are obsolete, delusional and will kill each other or starve.

You don't have the right to steal from nor make rules for anyone. Even when elected, stop believing in evil bullshit.
If you wasted thousands of years of human wisdom, failed to learn basics of human interaction, your kind will not survive.

If you think that anarchy is about imposing your rule through initiation of aggression, by "your people", making you automatically a hardcore statist, you are very confused.

I do not care if you read Bakunin. Anarchy today has evolved.

I think you cannot go any more retard when you threaten people in anarchist groups, demanding your authority on what anarchy is today to be obeyed, or else...

Imposing your authority on what "not imposing authority is"proves you are an idiot.
Debating with an oxymoron is a complete waste of time.

The way anarchy works, is by freedom. ALSO freedom of association. This is how you will starve if you don't smarten up. People will just choose not to waste their time on a violent monkey.

I choose so. Better find something people could respect you for.

I get it that you are resentful because you haven't discovered what you don't suck at. If you think communism is anarchy, philosophizing isn't your calling neither.

It is natural there are people better than us that will create things we will value. I will not try to steal it from them nor tell them what they should do with their creation.
Instead, I will try my best to create well-being for myself and therefore for others.

You can think you will steal it from me, but I will stop your aggression.

You should be weary of signs of emergence of the most deadly ideology history has recorded, not confuse it with freedom. It is the extreme left (and right) ideology that is trying to force everyone to be homogeneous gumbas.

There is nothing extreme about anarchy, so ancoms "teaching" voluntaryists, is some weird grotesque imbalance.

There has not been any ideology that slaughtered more people. It is the delusion of being ubertolerant and civilized while being the opposite.

If a tiny minority of people can impose their "weirdness"on everyone, since everyone must be equal, under some weird delusion this is being open-minded, according to ancoms.

Our civilization, although needs a lot of improvement, it is the best humans had so far. There is the smallest number of poor people ever and even ignorant morons can have access to all human knowledge at a click.

If only they chose to learn.

If you are very keen on destroying, stealing from others with initiation of violence starting from you... maybe it is time to think about your "anarchy"? You know... since you are a violent thief...

First lets see what have you created and then discuss if you deserve what I created, OK?

Today facts become politically insensitive and kids are confusing reality with hate speech.

No wonder it is trendy to be violent communists blaming everything for being useless.

The fact of the matter is, that if you like for people to be forced to your worldview, you are far from being an anarchist.

How the hell can you twist everything the other way around and think it is real?

I don't want to be forced to anything, including compelled speech, that there is a gender called "a battle helicopter" because someone is so ill they believe so. They can believe it, but if you claim to be mentally healthy and you do believe there is an infinity of genders for example, it is not a sign of tolerance, but that you are not mentally healthy yourself.

I want to decide about my life. How will you force your authority on me and still think you are a peace-loving, free-speech advocating anarchist?

Why do you think forcing me to not create goods and services and deciding about them, but instead giving it to you is the anarchy?

I practice anarchy and disassociate myself from rabid apes. This is why I'm working on my off-grid farm. Not planning to slaughter anyone on "the streets". I've built my house, my fields.

When an ancom finally stops threatening people from capitalism-created device his mom bought him, he really should try to come and take my farm. I need to practice my archery and need oxymoron fillers for my cement work ;)

As always this guy:
cartman.jpg

I believe that every interaction between humans should be voluntary. I want for each individual to be the only controller of their lives and their property. I am an anarchist, a capitalist, a voluntaryist, but most of all, I am an individual, who does not recognize your value by the status you achieved in an imposed, imaginary collective. No matter who you are; if you respect others, respect me, I will always respect you.

PEACE AND LOVE IN ANARCHY

If you are interested in off-grid living, homesteading, medicinal plants and alternative lifestyle, check out my other blogs @lostambores and @smokeymcpot
U5drigd9CFwXgsAvtLqkE7KkZ61zVXg_1680x8400.jpg

follow.gif

upvote.gif

tribesteemuplogo.jpg

Sort:  

What happens in a voluntary system when someone rapes a woman or murders somebody?
Because you know such things happen regardless of the system.

Sure. There are bad people out there. I'm aware. I think it would be wise, to not give them total control of everybody's lives, as you end up with deaths of 300 million people in last 100 years and millions of people caged for victim-less "crimes", which is just disobeying to the threats of these worst people we allow to take the power they want. I believe sociopaths should not decide about my life.

In a voluntary society issues are resolved through consensus of people affected by an issue. You join a community or you start a community with people who share your values and you agree on rules voluntarily.
Some people may see hiring security companies that are rated 5 stars, based on customer experience and would let them resolve it. Local arbitrary services would take into account what is the consensus.

The solutions depend on how you would like to deal with this issue. Some people may decide, a rapist is a mentally ill person and would like to take care of him, some communities would expel this person, some communities would separate him from healthy people, so he does not harm anyone, some would just disassociate from him completely, so he would have only few options: change his behavior and submit to whatever just compensation would be established, like 10 years of giving half of his labor to the victim... he could become completely self-sufficient, but with others refusing to sell him anything, he would not even have a knife to hunt... he could move out of the community... or starve...
These are just examples.
Voluntary community is voluntary, therefore asking me to impose the rules you would like to see, is wrong from the beginning. I recommend this playlist:

And anything from this library:
mises.org/library

If you find this interesting, follow this rabbit hole. Internet is full of solutions.

Thanks for stopping by :)

To listen to the audio version of this article click on the play image.

Brought to you by @tts. If you find it useful please consider upvoting this reply.

This post received a $0.011 (3.30%) upvote from @upvotewhale thanks to @evolutionnow! For more information, check out my profile!

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.36
TRX 0.12
JST 0.039
BTC 70112.96
ETH 3549.99
USDT 1.00
SBD 4.71