RE: Yes, You Are a Slave! The Good News Is We Have the Secret, And We Are Winning.
The government's website says this:
A. THE IMMIGRATION & NATIONALITY ACT
Section 349(a)(5) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) (8 U.S.C. 1481(a)(5)) is the section of law governing the right of a United States citizen to renounce abroad his or her U.S. citizenship. That section of law provides for the loss of nationality by voluntarily and with the intention of relinquishing nationality:
"(5) making a formal renunciation of nationality before a diplomatic or consular officer of the United States in a foreign state, in such form as may be prescribed by the Secretary of State" (emphasis added).
B. ELEMENTS OF RENUNCIATION
A person wishing to renounce his or her U.S. citizenship must voluntarily and with intent to relinquish U.S. citizenship:
appear in person before a U.S. consular or diplomatic officer,
in a foreign country at a U.S. Embassy or Consulate; and
sign an oath of renunciation
That seems straightforward enough.
How much is the fee and where does it say there is a fee? Where does it say anything about an application or the possibility that it may be rejected?
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2014/08/28/2014-20516/schedule-of-fees-for-consular-services-department-of-state-and-overseas-embassies-and#p-amd-2
Here we go again.
Yes, defending yourself from an officer or agent attempting to steal your property is what I am talking about. Stop the legal euphemisms.
Finally, that is good to know. If someone takes 99% of the fruits of my labor by force it is not slavery, even though that fits the definition of the word.
It's not stealing when you get something in return and you are not allowed to fight or attack anyone including the police, if you attack a police officer or a repo agent or someone else legally taking their property do you think they don't have a right to defend themselves? why does their right to defend themselves go away? Where does your right to attack them come from?
I am glad I could explain that.
So let me get this right, the fellas paying the 92% tax rate in the 50s were slaves?
99% wouldn't fit the definition of slavery, now you get it. Think about why it is so important to you to be a slave that you redefine the word to include yourself.
Lol. Right. Like when my van was broken into and the bums that did it left some wine coolers in there.
Or like if there were a pizza joint that forced you to buy the pizza at gunpoint.
Or like the woman who was raped. Hey! She got some sex, didn’t she?!
Bobby says: It’s not stealing! You got something in return.
Lol. Fucking pure lunacy.
sounds like they didn't steal your van so that sounds like another example of something that is not stealing, now you are getting it!
Is there such a pizza joint Graham? In fact that bizarre hypothetical would not be stealing.
Very good Graham, that is also not stealing, that's why rape victims don't yell "theft! theft!" like you.
Bobby says: It’s not stealing! You got something in return.
Actually everyone on planet Earth, besides perhaps you, does not call "rape
" "stealing" they call it "rape".
What's pure lunacy is calling rape stealing. Its starting to seem pathological Graham. Words have meanings.
As I, unlike you, don’t view police as a class of individuals with greater rights than others, I don’t call it an “attack” when defending my property. I call it defense, which it is. Good luck with the euphemisms, and keep moving those goalposts! You’re making my case for me!
I am sure I never said they had any greater rights than others, at the point when a repo man or a cop comes to take your property then it is not yours anymore, they are legally taking it so then that makes you the aggressor attacking them for taking property they have a right to take possession of. Anyhow we all know that you wouldn't fight them Graham, like 99% of people, you will just go with them peacefully and then they won't physically hurt you at all. If you attack them then they will defend themselves, that's something everyone has a right to do isn't it?
But of course you don't have to worry about cops coming at all because you pay your taxes and follow the laws.
What's disingenuous is your claim that you would be killed for non payment of taxes when really you would be being killed by someone defending themselves from your physical attack.