The game sounds fun!

I have just clarified with the source. Let me do my best to demystify this as much as possible, without compromising anyone's security:

• The infosec professional would NOT have been acting in an official capacity with Check Point to doxx me, etc.

• The individual may or may not work with Check Point currently, but has connections with much larger firms as well.

• The proposal for the questionable channeling of funds, however, was to be done through official channels, which is why this association never materialized and a large part of the reason reports were filed.

I hope that helps a bit. The individual works in high echelons of power/clout and as such was surprised to discover the "nefarious" target was just a blogger, and not the monster I was made out to be.

Also, as an aside, the silence from @BenFarmer and the campaign raises big red flags. If someone spoofed your number, wouldn't you want to know, and remedy that immediately? Irreparable social damage can be done with this capability.