RE: STEM CryptoPlagiarism - Plagiarism Case #38 - Caso de Plagio #38 - @arar5
"a type of plagiarism that is specifically designed to circumvent the static @steemcleaners scope on plagiarism".
I do not believe that this mode of plagiarism is due to @steemcleaners because in my experience as a methodological advisor I have detected it for more than twenty years.
It is a trick used in the elaboration of thesis because of the tendency of the evaluators to request support of any value judgment.
I have always thought that this type of trick corresponds to the claim of giving what is requested but as fraudulently as possible. An answer to who considers you a mental eunuch, unable to create content with any particular value.
In this way, a way of thinking has been perpetuated, the one accepted by those who make up this current of thought, as the basis for the elaboration of degree works.
Excellent comment, i dont think JF ever got a better feedback.
And yes, we are aware that this is a classsic type of academic plagiarism that permeates to Steem, it just happens that the SC scope allows this as a loophole, so we wanted to emphasize that as strongly as possible. That this long lasting loophole remains open here, for "no reason".
Nevertheless the point remains that the user did not engage in plagiarism as an answer to "who considers you a mental eunuch, unable to create content with any particular value." but precisely because the user is unable to create content of any particular value, or chooses to create content in a facilistic manner. In Steem you see, certain things are different, we value original content , and also honesty.
If the user were to create SOME original thought, it would be warmly received.
We do not welcome fraud.
Thank you for your thought provoking comment,
Jaguar Force