You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: STEM CryptoPlagiarism - Plagiarism Case #38 - Caso de Plagio #38 - @arar5
I would like to have evidence for this claim:
the rest of the post is strictly copypaste with citations to the referenced sources
When I cite a source in a research paper it generally does not mean that I copy paste part but that I used the information of the citation to put forward a statement.
PS Stem is nowadays linked to marky's stemgeeks. So only use it for topics related to stemgeeks :P
What you point out is true, and it has been transformed into a gray area because of the tendency of the scientific community to preserve the status quo of the paradigm adopted (almost by obligation) by a majority that ends up repeating what a minority pointed out on its occasion and now it makes sure to limit the possibility of it being reviewed or reinterpreted.
In this scenario, your own or private ideas are NOT valid unless they are based on what another researcher has previously stated.
A paradigm that validates itself