Marxism is a worldview that in itself is integral and in this context allows to associate and understand phenomena that occur in different times and forms at different times; a philosophical conception that collects the possibilities of the sciences.

Source

It is also possible to relate the phenomena to each other, to fall into the maze and to be surprised by direction, as well as to associate stitches with an artistic taste. In this context, the importance of Marxism has increased even more. Of course, in order to understand this, it is necessary to be reconciled with Marxist sources, rather than to escape from the simplicity of learning from their parents.

Marxism is a dynamic intellectual systematic, living at the same time. However, contrary to what you might think, it does not address all the issues and reveal the finished-completed results. Women, art, environment, etc. The topics are relatively incomplete.

Source

The products produced by Marxist aesthetics, especially the works of the Soviet Union, can not be said to have formed a finished-completed movement, socialist reality, which is unimportant in size. The fact that M.Gorki put forward the method of "Socialist Realism" in the 1st Congress of Soviet Writers gathered in 1934 is a step in the way that the works gain a more complete quality under the party will. But that's ...

Until this turning point (1934), it can not be said that the party has drawn clear boundaries, despite Lenin's earlier assessments of "Party Literature". Art as a superficial phenomenon, for example, law, education, etc. The framework is not drawn as it is in other superstructural events such as. In this context, there have been many trends from formalism to futurism.

Regardless of where, when, and what needs to be said, it is at least inferior to Lenin's "Party Literature," or to dismiss clapping examples from the long and arduous Soviet construction, a founding process.

Sholohov points out that "ideological conflict in any other area of art is not as definite as in literature", and draws attention to the more direct reflection in literature, and also the fact that autonomy in relative terms is not exempt from contradiction or conflict from the ideological basis of art.

In addition, it should be carefully considered where the emphasis extends and where the discipline covers. Lenin is a "literary case", "must be a part of the whole proletarian case, must be the gear, song and screw of a united great social democratic machine, acted by all the conscious predecessors of the working class."